Generating Community, Generating Justice? The production and circulation of value in community energy initiatives
Taylor Chase Dotson, James E Wilcox
Reviewer A:
Reviewer did not want comments to be published
Recommendation: Accept.
Reviewer B:
Comments made on attached document.
Recommendation: Accept.
Reviewer C:
Please, comment on the most relevant aspects (positive points and areas to improve) of the reviewed article.
The text is clear and well written, but it is more a relfective paper with lots of ideas, proposals and opinions, and very few actual data on the kind of initiatives it talks about.
I also attach the paper with more comments
Would you suggest any changes or make any recommendations to improve the quality of the article?
I think the comments that are not relevant to the main argument should be reduced, as well as the personal recommendations of the authors: such as "they could do", "it might produce"... And base their argument on a better analysis of reality.
Paticularly they mention a few initiatives that seem interested but are completely unexplored. One is in Germany: a lot more thing should be said about this one. how do they deal with generative justice? How good are they at it? why?
Also, it would be much nicer if the subpoints of the point 3 (3.1, 3.2, 3.4, etc) could include references to actual things and initiatives.
Recommendation: Resubmit for revisions.
The text included important modifications before publication
