Anti-authoritarian metrics: recursivity as a strategy for post-capitalism

  • David Adam Banks Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Keywords: Efficiency, counter-power, organizational design, rationalization, recursion
Agencies: NSF grant DGE-0947980

Abstract

This essay proposes that those seeking to build counter-power institutions and communities learn to think in terms of what I call “recursivity.” Recursivity is an anti-authoritarian metric that helps bring about a sensitivity to feedback loops at multiple levels of organization. I begin by describing how technological systems and the socio-economic order co-constitute one-another around efficiency metrics. I then go on to define recursivity as social conditions that contain within them all of the parts and practices for their maturation and expansion, and show how organizations that demonstrate recursivity, like the historical English commons, have been marginalized or destroyed all together. Finally, I show how the ownership of property is inherently antithetical to the closed loops of recursivity. All of this is bookended by a study of urban planning’s recursive beginnings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

David Adam Banks, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
David A. Banks is a Ph.D candidate in Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute's Science and Technology Studies Department. His work focuses on the design of organizations, public space, self-organizing systems, and the political economy of digital networks. David is an organizing committee member for Theorizing the Web and an editor of The Society Pages' technology & society blog Cyborgology.
View citations

Article download

Crossmark

Metrics

Published
2016-11-18
Opr
How to Cite
Banks D. A. (2016). Anti-authoritarian metrics: recursivity as a strategy for post-capitalism. Teknokultura. Journal of Digital Culture and Social Movements, 13(2), 405-438. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_TEKN.2016.v13.n2.52267

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
4
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
N/A
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
67%
33%
Days to publication 
225
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Academic society 
N/A
Publisher 
Grupo de Investigación Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales. Cibersomosaguas