Anti-authoritarian metrics: recursivity as a strategy for post-capitalism

  • David Adam Banks Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Palabras clave: Eficiencia, contrapoder, diseño organizacional, racionalización, recursividad


This essay proposes that those seeking to build counter-power institutions and communities learn to think in terms of what I call “recursivity.” Recursivity is an anti-authoritarian metric that helps bring about a sensitivity to feedback loops at multiple levels of organization. I begin by describing how technological systems and the socio-economic order co-constitute one-another around efficiency metrics. I then go on to define recursivity as social conditions that contain within them all of the parts and practices for their maturation and expansion, and show how organizations that demonstrate recursivity, like the historical English commons, have been marginalized or destroyed all together. Finally, I show how the ownership of property is inherently antithetical to the closed loops of recursivity. All of this is bookended by a study of urban planning’s recursive beginnings.


La información sobre descargas todavía no está disponible.

Biografía del autor/a

David Adam Banks, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
David A. Banks is a Ph.D candidate in Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute's Science and Technology Studies Department. His work focuses on the design of organizations, public space, self-organizing systems, and the political economy of digital networks. David is an organizing committee member for Theorizing the Web and an editor of The Society Pages' technology & society blog Cyborgology.


Alperovitz, G. (2013). What Then Must We Do?: Straight Talk About the Next American Revolution. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing Company.

Amster, R. (2009). Contemporary Anarchist Studies: An Introductory Anthology of Anarchy in the Academy. New York, NY: Routledge.

Banks, D. A. (2015). Lines of power: Availability to networks as a social phenomenon. First Monday, 20(11).

Bellamy, E., & MacDonald, A. (2003). Looking backward, 2000-1887. Peterborough, Ont: Broadview Press

Berardi, F. B. (2011). After the Future. (G. Genosko & N. Thoburn, Eds.). Oakland, CA: AK Press.

Bijker, W. E. (1992). The Social Construction of Flourescent Lighting, Or How an Artifact Was Invented in Its Diffusion Stage. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change (pp. 75–102). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Braverman, H. (1998). Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century (25th Anniversary Edition). New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.

Bromley, D. W. (1990). The ideology of efficiency: Searching for a theory of policy analysis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 19(1), 86–107.

Coleman, G. (2012). Coding Freedom: The Ethics and Aesthetics of Hacking. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Cox, S. J. B. (1985). No Tragedy of the Commons: Environmental Ethics, 7(1), 49–61.

Eglash, R. (2006). Problematizing Technological “Appropriation.” In Society for Social Studies of Science Annual Meeting. Montreal.

Eglash, R. (2014, April 15). Generative Justice: The Revolution Will Be Self-Organized. Tikkun Magazine. Retrieved from

Eglash, R., & Banks, D. A. (2014). Recursive Depth in Generative Spaces: Democratization in Three Dimensions of Technosocial Self-Organization. The Information Society, 30(2), 106–115.

Ellul, J. (1964). The Technological Society. Toronto, ON: Vintage Books.

Fishman, R. (1982). Urban Utopias in the Twentieth Century: Ebenezer Howard, Frank Lloyd Wright, Le Corbusier. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. (D. Macedo, Trans.) (30th Anniversary Edition). New York, NY: Continuum International Publishing Group.

Galloway, A. (2001). Protocol, or, How Control Exists after Decentralization. Rethinking Marxism, 13(3-4), 81–88.

Galloway, A. (2006). Protocol. Theory, Culture & Society, 23(2-3), 317–320.

Galloway, A. (2011). Are Some Things Unrepresentable? Theory, Culture & Society, 28(7-8), 85–102.

Gordon, S. (1996). Passage to Union: How the Railroads Transformed American Life, 1829-1929. Chicago, IL: Elephant Paperbacks.

Gowdy, J. M. (2004). Altruism, Evolution, and Welfare Economics. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 53(1), 69–73.

Graeber, D. (2009). Direct Action: An Ethnography. Oakland, CA: AK Press.

Graeber, D. (2011). Consumption. Current Anthropology, 52(4), 489–511.

Gray, C. H. (2004). Peace, War and Computers. New York, NY: Routledge.

Gray, C. H., & Gordo, Á. J. (2014). Social Media in Conflict Comparing Military and Social-Movement Technocultures. Cultural Politics, 10(3), 251–261.

Gronow, J. (1988). The Element of Irrationality: Max Weber’s Diagnosis of Modern Culture. Acta Sociologica, 31(4), 319–331.

Hall, P. (2002). Cities of tomorrow: An Intellectual History of Urban Planning and Design in the Twentieth Century. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.

Harvey, D. (2012). Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution. New York: Verso.

Hughes, T. P. (2012). The Evolution of Large Technological Systems. In W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, & T. Pinch (Eds.), The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology (Anniversary Edition, pp. 45–76). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

International Rice Research Institute. (2007). The great rice robbery: a handbook on the impact of IRRI in Asia. Penang, Malaysia: Pesticide Action Network Asia and the Pacific in collaboration with Sibol ng Agham at Teknolohiya.

Jaffe, S. (2015, January 13). Can worker cooperatives alleviate income inequality? Al Jazeera America. New York, NY. Retrieved from

Jayasinghe, R. (2013, August). Assumptions, Diverse Realities, and Promises: Understanding Power Relations in Waste Management in Sri Lanka. Conference presentation presented at the Engineering, Social Justice, and Peace Conference, Troy, NY.

Kelty, C. (2008). Two Bits: The Cultural Significance of Free Software. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Kleinman, D. L. (1998). Untangling Context : Understanding a University Laboratory in the Commercial World. Science, Technology & Human Values, 23(3), 285–314.

Layne, L. (2000). The Cultural Fix: An Anthropological Contribution to Science and Technology Studies. Science Technology & Human Values, 25(3), 352–379.

Layosa, P. M. (2007). Impact of IRRI on Philippine’s Rice Agriculture. In International Rice Research Institute (Ed.), The great rice robbery: a handbook on the impact of IRRI in Asia. Penang, Malaysia: Pesticide Action Network Asia and the Pacific in collaboration with Sibol ng Agham at Teknolohiya.

MacKenzie, D. (2012). Missile Accuracy: A Case Study in the Social Processes of Technological Change. In W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, & T. Pinch (Eds.), The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology (Anniversary Edition, pp. 189–216). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Maldonado, C., & Mezza-Garcia, N. (2016). Anarchy and Complexity. Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 18(1). Retrieved from

McKinnon, A. M. (2010). Elective Affinities of the Protestant Ethic: Weber and the Chemistry of Capitalism. Sociological Theory, 28(1), 108–126.

Mumford, L. (2010). Technics and civilization (University of Chicago Press edition 2010). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

Nieusma, D., & Blue, E. (2012). Engineering and War. International Journal of Engineering, Social Justice, and Peace, 1(1), 50–62.

Peletz, M. G. (1988). A Share of the Harvest: Kinship, Property, and Social History Among the Malays of Rembau. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

Pickering, A. (1995). The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Portwood-Stacer, L. (2013). Lifestyle Politics and Radical Activism. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Press.

Proudhon, P.-J. (2011). Property Is Theft!: A Pierre-Joseph Proudhon Reader. (I. McKay, Ed.). Oakland, CA: AK Press.

Sismondo, S. (2005). Pierre Bourdieu: Science of Science and Reflexivity. Canadian Journal of Sociology, (April), 2004–2005.

Sochor, Z. A. (1981). Soviet Taylorism Revisited. Soviet Studies, 33(2), 246–264.

Torsen, M. (2008). The Domination of the English Language in the Global Village: Efforts to Further Develop the Internet by Populating it with Non-Latin-Based Languages (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 1125366). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from

Tufekci, Z. (2014). Engineering the public: Big data, surveillance and computational politics. First Monday, 19(7). Retrieved from

Virilio, P. (2006). Speed and politics (2006 edition). Los Angeles, CA: Semiotext(e).

Ward, C. (2011). Autonomy Solidarity Possibility: The Colin Ward Reader. (C. Wilbert & D. F. White, Eds.). Baltimore: AK Press.

Weber, M., Gerth, H. H., & Mills, C. W. (1958). From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. Oxford University Press (Galaxy imprint).

Williams, R. (2006). Base and Superstructure in Marxist Cultural Theory. In M. G. Durham & D. Kellner (Eds.), Media and cultural studies: keyworks (Revised Edition, pp. 131–143). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Winner, L. (1977). Autonomous technology: Technics-Out-of-Control As A Theme in Political Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Winner, L. (1980). Do Artifacts Have Politics? Daedalus, 109(1), 121–136.

Woolgar, S., & Cooper, G. (1999). Do Artefacts Have Ambivalence? Moses’ Bridges, Winner’s Bridges and other Urban Legends in S&TS. Social Studies of Science, 29(3), 433–449.

Zimmermann, B. (2011). Analyzing Social Networking Websites: The Design of Happy Network in China. In G. Adamson, G. Riello, & S. Teasley (Eds.), Global Design History (pp. 153–162). Routledge. Retrieved from

Cómo citar
Banks, D. (2016). Anti-authoritarian metrics: recursivity as a strategy for post-capitalism. Teknokultura. Revista De Cultura Digital Y Movimientos Sociales, 13(2), 405-438.