Using of ICT and LKT in higher education:
A bibliometric analysis
- Jennifer Lorena Gómez Contreras Universidad Militar Nueva Granada
- Cristian Alberto Bonilla Torres Universidad Militar Nueva Granada
- Yuri Catherine Esteban Ojeda Universidad Militar Nueva Granada
Abstract
INTRODUCTION. This paper analyzes the scientific output on the use of information and communication technologies (ICT) and Learning and Knowledge Technologies (LKT) to improve pedagogical innovation and/or teaching/learning processes in distance and/or virtual higher education. METHODOLOGY. The information was searched for systematically in seven academic databases. The data were analyzed around 11 bibliometric indicators. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: the concept of ICT prevails regarding the use of tools such as MOOC, social networks, virtual learning environments, as well as in pedagogical trends, such as e-Learning and B-learning, collaborative learning, and digital skills, with LKTs being an incipient concept in the research. There is also evidence that authors would rather have research papers present the results of their research. Spain is among the countries with the largest output, while Latin American countries' output on this subject, such as Colombia's and Argentina's, has grown and English is dominant in the publications analyzed. On the other hand, the universities using distance education are the ones publishing the most on this subject, and the authors with the highest output are classified as medium-sized producers according to the Lotka Law.
Downloads
References
Adell, J., Castañeda, L., & Esteve, F. M. (2018). ¿Hacia la Ubersidad? Conflictos y contradicciones de la universidad digital. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 21(2), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.21.2.20669
Albertos, A., Domingo, À., & Albertos, J. E. (2016). Estrategia docente para el desarrollo de la competencia digital en el aula universitaria: Del uso recreativo al uso formativo. Educar, 52(2), 243–261. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/educar.732
AlDahdouh, A. A. (2018). Jumping from one resource to another: how do students navigate learning networks? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(45), s.p. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0126-x
Amado, H. R., Hilera, J. R., & Otón, S. (2018). Formalización de un marco metodológico para la implementación de un proyecto educativo virtual accesible. Educacion XX1, 21(2), 349–371. https://doi.org/10.5944/educXX1.15591
Amaro, R., & Chacín, R. (2017). La evaluación en el aula virtual. Voces de La Educación, 2(1), 3–30. http://ezproxy.umng.edu.co:2048/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.ezproxy.umng.edu.co/docview/2190144798?accountid=30799
Ángel, I. C., & Patiño, M. R. (2018). Línea base de indicadores de apropiación de TIC en instituciones educativas. Educación y Educadores, 21(3), 435–457. https://doi.org/10.5294/edu.2018.21.3.4
Annamalai, N. (2018). Exploring the use of facebook and other social media sites in pre-service teacher education. The English Teacher, 47(1), 1–14. http://ezproxy.umng.edu.co:2048/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.ezproxy.umng.edu.co/docview/2164441455?accountid=30799
Area, M., San Nicolás, M. B., & Sanabria, A. L. (2018). Las aulas virtuales en la docencia de una universidad presencial: la visión del alumnado. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 21(2), 179–198. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.21.2.20666
Arqueta, M. G., & Ramírez, M. S. (2017). Innovación en el diseño instruccional de cursos masivos abiertos con gamificación y REA para formar en sustentabilidad energética. Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS), 18(4), 75–96. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks20171847596
Arruda, R., Prata-Linhares, M., & Paredes, J. (2018). Pedagogical innovation with the use of ICT: perceptions of faculty members from Brazil, Spain and Mexico about their practices. Acta Scientiarum. Education, 40(3), s.p. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascieduc.v40i3.36217
Astudillo, M. P. (2016). La configuración didáctica de las estrategias de enseñanza con Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación en las prácticas pedagógicas de las ingenierías realizadas en dos instituciones de educación superior mexicanas. Education in the Knowledge Society (EKS), 17(2), 109–131. https://doi.org/10.14201/eks2016172109131
Avidov, O., & Forkosh, A. (2018). Professional identity of teacher educators in the digital era in light of demands of pedagogical innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 73, 183–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.03.017
Badilla, M. G., & Meza, S. (2015). A pedagogical model to develop teaching skills. The collaborative learning experience in the Immersive Virtual World TYMMI. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 594–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.016
Barroso, J., & Cabero, J. (2016). Evaluación de objetos de aprendizaje en realidad aumentada: Estudio piloto en el grado de Medicina. Enseñanza & Teaching: Revista Interuniversitaria de Didáctica, 34(2), 149–167. https://doi.org/10.14201/et2016342149167
Bozkurt, A., Koutropoulos, A., Singh, L., & Honeychurch, S. (2020). On lurking: Multiple perspectives on lurking within an educational community. The Internet and Higher Education, 44, s.p. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100709
Calderón, D., León, A., & Gil, R. (2019). El uso de las redes sociales entre los estudiantes de grado de maestro en un entorno exclusivamente online. Vivat Academia. Revista de Comunicación, 147, 23–40. https://doi.org/10.15178/va.2019.147.23-40
Campos, H. (2019). Fenomenología de la adopción de las Tecnologías de la Información y las Comunicaciones (TIC) en docentes de un Centro Público de Investigación. Revista Dilemas Contemporáneos: Educación, Política y Valores, 32(2), s.p. http://ezproxy.umng.edu.co:2048/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.ezproxy.umng.edu.co/docview/2247173720?accountid=30799
Chmiel, A. S., Shaha, M., & Schneider, D. K. (2017). Introduction of blended learning in a master program: Developing an integrative mixed method evaluation framework. Nurse Education Today, 48, 172–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.10.008
Čičević, S., Samčović, A., & Nešić, M. (2016). Exploring college students’ generational differences in Facebook usage. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.034
Czerniewicz, L., Deacon, A., Glover, M., & Walji, S. (2017). MOOC—making and open educational practices. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29, 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-016-9128-7
Daniela, L., Visvizi, A., Gutiérrez, C., & Lytras, M. D. (2018). Sustainable higher education and technology-enhanced learning (TEL). Sustainability, 10(11), s.p. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10113883
Dooly, M., & Masats, D. (2015). A critical appraisal of foreign language research in content and language integrated learning, young language learners, and technology-enhanced language learning published in Spain (2003-2012). Language Teaching, 48(3), 343–372. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444815000117
Dorner, H., & Kumar, S. (2016). Online collaborative mentoring for technology integration in pre-service teacher education. TechTrends, 60, 48–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-015-0016-1
Echandi, M. del P. (2019). Millennials en la biblioteca : promoción de la lectura recreativa en el entorno digital. Cuadernos de Documentación Multimedia, 30, 35–58. https://doi.org/10.5209/cdmu.62807
Enago Learn. (2020). Curso titulado: Estructura de un artículo original del título a la conclusión. s.p. https://enago-spanish.thinkific.com/
Eriksson, Y., Bjelkemyr, M., Chirumalla, K., & Schaeffer, J. (2017). Teachers’ role in blended learning: The Emperor´s new clothes? Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on E-Learning (ECEL 2017), 163–168. http://ezproxy.umng.edu.co:2048/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.ezproxy.umng.edu.co/docview/1968934653?accountid=30799
Espinel, B. I., Sevillano, M. L., Monterrosa, I. J., & Pascual, C. (2019). El auge del aprendizaje universitario ubicuo. Uso de las tabletas en la apropiación del conocimiento. Educatio Siglo XXI, 37(2), 183–204. https://doi.org/10.6018/educatio.387071
Fernández, M., & Cano, E. (2016). The influence of the internet for pedagogical innovation: using twitter to promote online collaborative learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(22), s.p. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0021-2
Flavin, M., & Quintero, V. (2018). UK higher education institutions’ technology-enhanced learning strategies from the perspective of disruptive innovation. Research in Learning Technology, 26, s.p. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v26.1987
Fonseca, D., Redondo, E., Valls, F., & Villagrasa, S. (2017). Technological adaptation of the student to the educational density of the course. A case study: 3D architectural visualization. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 599–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.048
García, L. (2017). Los MOOC están muy vivos. Respuestas a algunas preguntas. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 20(1), 9–27. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.20.1.17488
Gedeon, P., & Khalil, L. (2015). Management of the transition to e-learning in higher education based on competence quotient. Procedia Computer Science, 65, 324–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.09.091
Gil, I., & Domínguez, D. (2018). Teachers’ roles in light of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Evolution and challenges in higher distance education. International Review of Education, 64, 197–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-018-9715-0
Giudicessi, S. L., Martínez, M. C., Saavedra, S. L., Cascone, O., & Camperi, S. A. (2016). Las tecnologías y la enseñanza en la educación superior. Un simulador aplicado a la integración de conceptos enseñados en cursos de posgrado. Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluación Educativa, 9(2), 9–28. https://doi.org/10.15366/riee2016.9.2.001
Gogoi, L. (2016). Education with ICT for developing employability in higher education institutions. TechnoLearn: An International Journal of Educational Technology, 6(2), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.5958/2249-5223.2016.00007.3
Gómez, I. M., Ruiz, M., & Ortega, D. (2019). Digital literacy of teachers in training: Moving from ICTs (Information and Communication Technologies) to LKTs (Learning and Knowledge Technologies). Education Sciences, 9(4), s.p. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9040274
González, M., Portero, A. E., Machado, R., & Cristóbal, M. (2018). Dos asignaturas en un solo proceso de enseñanza. Innovación pedagógica en la formación de arquitectos. Apuntes. Revista de Estudios Sobre Patrimonio Cultural, 31(2), s.p. https://doi.org/10.11144/javeriana.apu31-2.apei
Grigoryan, T. (2018). Investigating digital native female learners’ attitudes towards paperless language learning. Research in Learning Technology, 26, s.p. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v26.1937
Grinsztajn, F. I., Szteinberg, R. P., Sanchez, G., Mangas, J., & Vaccaro, M. (2019). Culturas digitales y experiencias pedagógicas. Proyecto Integral de Inclusión Digital en la FCV-UBA como política institucional. Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnología En Educación y Educación En Tecnología, 23, 22–30. https://doi.org/10.24215/18509959.23.e03
Henríquez, G., Veracoechea, B., Papale, J. F., & Berrios, A. T. (2015). Modelo de capacitación docente para entornos virtuales de aprendizaje. Caso decanato ciencias de la salud de la UCLA. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 18(1), 67–90. http://ezproxy.umng.edu.co:2048/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.ezproxy.umng.edu.co/docview/1649109673?accountid=30799
Hepp, P., Prats, M. À., & Holgado, J. (2015). Teacher training: technology helping to develop an innovative and reflective professional profile. RUSC Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 12(2), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v12i2.2458
Herrador, T. C., & Hernández, M. (2017). Numerical-technological skills and work experience in the perceived usefulness in an accounting virtual learning environment. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 16(3), 116–131. http://ezproxy.umng.edu.co:2048/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.ezproxy.umng.edu.co/docview/1953141180?accountid=30799
Herran, A., & Fortunato, I. (2017). La clave de la educación no está en las nuevas Tecnologías de la Información y comunicación (TIC). Acta Scientiarum. Education, 39(3), 311–317. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascieduc.v39i3.33008
Islam, A., Sadekur, M., & Mahbubul, Y. (2017). ICT in higher education: Wiki-based reflection to promote deeper thinking levels. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, 9(4), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijmecs.2017.04.05
Koohang, A., & Paliszkiewicz, J. (2015). E-learning courseware usability: building a theoretical model. The Journal of Computer Information Systems; Fall, 56(1), 55–61. http://ezproxy.umng.edu.co:2048/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.ezproxy.umng.edu.co/docview/1729274772?accountid=30799
Kumar, S., & Daniel, B. K. (2016). Integration of learning technologies into teaching within Fijian Polytechnic Institutions. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(36), s.p. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0036-8
Lameu, P. (2020). The case of the ‘nasty trolley’ or how mobile Learning and tablets are influencing emotions and affects and shaping the constitution of the identity of teachers and students. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 25, 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-019-09411-y
Lašáková, A., Bajzíková, Ľ., & Dedze, I. (2017). Barriers and drivers of innovation in higher education: Case study-based evidence across ten European universities. International Journal of Educational Development, 55, 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.06.002
Lavi, U. (2015). The influence of visualization of sorts on computer science students’ formal understanding using timed browser (*TB). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 209, 290–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.235
Lebeničnik, M., Pitt, I., & Starčič, A. I. (2015). Use of online learning resources in the development of learning environments at the intersection of formal and informal learning: The student as autonomous designer. CEPS Journal, 5(2), 95–113. http://ezproxy.umng.edu.co:2048/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.ezproxy.umng.edu.co/docview/1696923923?accountid=30799
Lee, K. (2017). Rethinking the accessibility of online higher education: A historical review. Internet and Higher Education, 33, 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.01.001
Lim, G., Shelley, A., & Heo, D. (2019). The regulation of learning and co-creation of new knowledge in mobile learning. Knowledge Management and E-Learning, 11(4), 449–484. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2019.11.024
Livingstone, K. A. (2015). Teaching faculty’s perception about implementing elearning practices at the University of Guyana. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 11(2), 85–103. http://ezproxy.umng.edu.co:2048/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.ezproxy.umng.edu.co/docview/1714103904?accountid=30799
Livingstone, K. A. (2019). The place of Information and Communication Technologies in curriculum design and development. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 15(4), 180–197. http://ezproxy.umng.edu.co:2048/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.ezproxy.umng.edu.co/docview/2338298503?accountid=30799
Londoño, O. L., Calderón, L. C., Lucumí, P., & González, M. A. (2017). Experiencia innovadora de la estructuración ontológica del conocimiento con docentes y estudiantes. Praxis & Saber, 8(16), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.19053/22160159.v7.n15.2016.5724
Lozano, R. (2011). De las TIC a las TAC: tecnologías del aprendizaje y del conocimiento. Anuario ThinkEPI, 5, 45–47. https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/ThinkEPI/article/view/30465
Lugo, M. T., & Brito, A. (2015). Las políticas TIC en la educación de América Latina. Una oportunidad para saldar deudas pendientes. Archivos de Ciencias de La Educación, 9, s.p. http://ezproxy.umng.edu.co:2048/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.ezproxy.umng.edu.co/docview/1943129724?accountid=30799
Maisonneuve, H., Chambe, J., Lorenzo, M., & Pelaccia, T. (2015). How do general practice residents use social networking sites in asynchronous distance learning? BMC Medical Education, 15(1), s.p. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-015-0435-x
Manjarrés, A., Pickin, S. J., Meana, H. A., & Rodríguez, N. (2020). Virtu@l-ApS: Technological support for virtual service-learning. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 23(1), s.p. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.22.2.24397
Manotas, E., Pérez, A., & Contreras, P. (2019). Propuesta de diseño de instrumento para analizar vídeo-lecciones en MOOC. Alteridad, 14(1), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.17163/alt.v14n1.2019.04
Martos, D., Usabiaga, O., & Valencia, A. (2017). Students’ perception on formative and shared assessment: Connecting two universities through the blogosphere. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 6(1), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.7821/naer.2017.1.194
Mendieta, M. (2016). Integración en el contexto de la educación superior pública de Nicaragua: El nuevo modelo educativo de la UNAN-Managua. Edmetic. Revista de Educación Mediática y TIC, 5(2), 29–50. https://doi.org/10.21071/edmetic.v5i2.5775
Mengual, S., Roig, R., & Blasco, J. (2016). Delphi study for the design and validation of a questionnaire about digital competences in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(12), s.p. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0009-y
Molina, P., Valenciano, J., & Valencia, A. (2015). Los blogs como entornos virtuales de enseñanza y aprendizaje en educación superior. Revista Complutense de Educacion, 26, 15–31. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_RCED.2015.v26.43791
Muianga, X. J., Männikkö, S., Hansson, H., & Vasco, I. (2019). Teachers´ perspectives on professional development in the use of SCL approaches and ICT: A quantitative case study of Eduardo Mondlane University, Mozambique. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 15(2), 79–97. http://ezproxy.umng.edu.co:2048/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.ezproxy.umng.edu.co/docview/2255687583?accountid=30799
Nkonki, V., & Ntlabathi, S. (2016). Teaching and learning innovations on blackboard: What form and function? International Conference on E-Learning, 120–126. http://ezproxy.umng.edu.co:2048/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.ezproxy.umng.edu.co/docview/1803782367?accountid=30799
Olaniran, S. O., Duma, M. A. N., & Nzima, D. R. (2017). Assessing the utilization level of E-Learning resources among ODL based pre-service teacher trainees. The Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 15(5), 385–395. http://ezproxy.umng.edu.co:2048/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.ezproxy.umng.edu.co/docview/1967741688?accountid=30799
Olasina, G. (2018). Factors of best practices of e-learning among undergraduate students. Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal (KM&EL), 10(3), 265–289. http://ezproxy.umng.edu.co:2048/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.ezproxy.umng.edu.co/docview/2120917626?accountid=30799
Olázabal, A. (2019). La formación docente digital del profesor de derecho en Cuba. Revista de Educación y Derecho, 19, s.p. http://ezproxy.umng.edu.co:2048/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.ezproxy.umng.edu.co/docview/2298574867?accountid=30799
Oliveira, P. C., Castro, C. J., & Nakayama, M. K. (2016). Learning management systems (LMS) and e-learning management: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 13(2), 157–180. https://doi.org/10.4301/S1807-17752016000200001
Ortega, I., Albert, M. J., & García, M. (2017). Derechos humanos y educación: Evaluación continua a través de la red. Enseñanza & Teaching: Revista Interuniversitaria de Didáctica, 35(1), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.14201/et20173518198
Osuna, S., Marta, C., & Frau, D. (2018). De sMOOC a tMOOC, el aprendizaje hacia la transferencia profesional: El proyecto europeo ECO. Comunicar, 26(55), 105–114. https://doi.org/10.3916/C55-2018-10
Papanikolaou, K., Makri, K., & Roussos, P. (2017). Learning design as a vehicle for developing TPACK in blended teacher training on technology enhanced learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(34), s.p. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0072-z
Papi, C. (2015). Digital spaces: between educational tools and student uses. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 3757–3764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.1110
Peré, N. (2017). Apuntes para analizar la relación entre innovación, TIC y formación pedagógico-didáctica. Praxis & Saber, 8(16), 15–33. https://doi.org/10.19053/22160159.v8.n16.2017.6165
Pérez, S., Montoya, J., & Guillén, L. (2018). Fundamentos teóricos de la dinámica de formación del conocimiento científico pedagógico en el contexto de las TIC. Revista Dilemas Contemporáneos: Educación, Política y Valores., 43(2), s.p. http://ezproxy.umng.edu.co:2048/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.ezproxy.umng.edu.co/docview/2247190977?accountid=30799
Pounds, A., & Bostock, J. (2019). Open educational resources (OER) in higher education courses in aquaculture and fisheries: opportunities, barriers, and future perspectives. Aquaculture International, 27, 695–710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-019-00355-9
Rajasekharan, P. K., & Prakash, A. V. (2017). Technological leverage in higher education: An evolving pedagogy. Journal of International Education in Business, 10(2), 130–146. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIEB-09-2016-0034
Ranieri, M., Raffaghelli, J., & Pezzati, F. (2018). Building cases for faculty development in e-learning: a design-based approach. Form@re. Open Journal per La Formazione in Rete, 18(1), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.13128/formare-22482
Revelo, J. E., Revuelta, F. I., & González, A. (2018). Modelo de integración de la competencia digital del docente universitario para su desarrollo profesional en la enseñanza de la matemática – Universidad Tecnológica Equinoccial de Ecuador. Edmetic. Revista de Educación Mediática y TIC, 7(1), 196–224. https://doi.org/10.21071/edmetic.v7i1.6910
Roblizo, M., Sánchez, M. C., & Cózar, R. (2016). El reto de la competencia digital en los futuros docentes de infantil, primaria y secundaria: Los estudiantes de grado y máster de educación ante las TIC. Prisma Social. Revista de Investigación Social, 15, 254–295. http://ezproxy.umng.edu.co:2048/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.ezproxy.umng.edu.co/docview/1759176482?accountid=30799
Rocu, P., Blández, J., & Sierra, M. Á. (2019). Construyendo aprendizajes en expresión corporal a través de WebQuest: un estudio de caso múltiple. Revista Complutense de Educacion, 30(4), 1013–1029. https://doi.org/10.5209/rced.59905
Ruiz, J., & Vargas, A. (2018). La enseñanza de las estructuras en el grado de arquitectura. Metodología e innovación docente a través de las TIC. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 76(270), 353–372. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26547075
Salas, F. E. (2016). Aportes del modelo de Yrjö Engeström al desarrollo teórico de la docencia universitaria. Revista Educación, 40(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.15517/revedu.v40i2.15257
Sánchez, J., Ruiz, J., & Sánchez, E. (2017). Flipped classroom. Claves para su puesta en práctica. Edmetic. Revista de Educación Mediática y TIC, 6(2), 336–358. https://doi.org/10.21071/edmetic.v6i2.5832
Sandí, J. C., & Sanz, C. V. (2020). Juegos serios para potenciar la adquisición de competencias digitales en la formación del profesorado. Revista Educación, 44(1), s.p. https://doi.org/10.15517/revedu.v44i1.37228
Sangrà, A., González, M., & Anderson, T. (2015). Metaanálisis de la investigación sobre MOOC en el período 2013-2014. Educacion XX1, 18(2), 21–49. https://doi.org/10.5944/educXX1.13463
Schindler, L. A., Burkholder, G. J., Morad, O. A., & Marsh, C. (2017). Computer-based technology and student engagement: a critical review of the literature. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(25), s.p. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0063-0
Schmitt, C. (2019). La contribución de RIED en 30 años de actividad científica. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 22(1), 9–25. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.22.1.22460
Seifert, T. (2016). Patterns of mobile technology use in teaching the teacher perspective. I-Manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 13(3), s.p. http://ezproxy.umng.edu.co:2048/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.ezproxy.umng.edu.co/docview/1875271699?accountid=30799
Seifert, T. (2017). Training the teachers of tomorrow in an era of rapid technological advancement. I-Manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 14(1), 35–46. http://ezproxy.umng.edu.co:2048/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.ezproxy.umng.edu.co/docview/1939700348?accountid=30799
Seixas, S., Saravanan, S., & Gonçalves, S. (2015). Innovation and educational changes: two e-learning cases in aquaculture. Aquaculture International, 23(3), 843–859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-014-9850-y
Sim, K. N., & Stein, S. (2016). Reaching the unreached: de-mystifying the role of ICT in the process of doctoral research. Research in Learning Technology, 24, s.p. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v24.30717
Soto, D. E., & Forero, A. (2016). La universidad latinoamericana y del Caribe en los desafíos del Siglo XXI. Revista Historia de La Educación Latinoamericana, 18(26), 279–309. https://doi.org/10.19053/01227238.4375
Tobías, M. Á., Duarte, M. do C., & Kemczinski, A. (2015). Un repositorio digital de contenido fílmico como recurso didáctico. Comunicar, 22(44), 63–71. https://doi.org/10.3916/C44-2015-07
Torres, C. I. (2016). Involvement of the teacher in technology-mediated educational environments. Revista de Comunicación Vivat Academia, 132, 68–81. http://ezproxy.umng.edu.co:2048/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.ezproxy.umng.edu.co/docview/1831816474?accountid=30799
Traxler, J. (2016). Inclusion in an age of mobility. Research in Learning Technology, 24, s.p. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v24.31372
Trujillo, J. M., Aznar, I., & Cáceres, M. P. (2015). Análisis del uso e integración de redes sociales colaborativas en comunidades de aprendizaje de la Universidad de Granada (España) y John Moores (Reino Unido). Revista Complutense de Educacion, 26, 289–311. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_RCED.2015.v26.46380
Trujillo, J. M., Hinojo, M. A., Marín, J. A., Romero, J. J., & Campos, A. (2015). Análisis de experiencias de aprendizajes basados en proyectos: prácticas colaborativas B-Learning. Edmetic. Revista de Educación Mediática y TIC, 4(1), 51–77. https://doi.org/10.21071/edmetic.v4i1.2899
Urrútia, G., & Bonfill, X. (2010). Declaración PRISMA: una propuesta para mejorar la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis. Medicina Clinica, 135(11), 507–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medcli.2010.01.015
Vázquez, E., & López, E. (2015). La filosofía educativa de los MOOC y la educación universitaria. RIED. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 18(2), 25–37. http://ezproxy.umng.edu.co:2048/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.ezproxy.umng.edu.co/docview/1701877398?accountid=30799
Venkatesh, V., Rabah, J., Fusaro, M., Couture, A., Varela, W., & Alexander, K. (2016). Factors impacting university instructors’ and students’ perceptions of course effectiveness and technology integration in the age of web 2.0. McGILL Journal of Education, 51(1), 533–561. http://ezproxy.umng.edu.co:2048/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.ezproxy.umng.edu.co/docview/1841952480?accountid=30799
Westera, W. (2019). Why and how serious games can become far more effective: Accommodating productive learning experiences, learner motivation and the monitoring of learning gains. Educational Technology & Society, 22(1), 59–69. http://ezproxy.umng.edu.co:2048/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.ezproxy.umng.edu.co/docview/2186731578?accountid=30799
Article download
Crossmark
License
In order to support the global exchange of knowledge, the journal Revista Complutense de Educación is allowing unrestricted access to its content as from its publication in this electronic edition, and as such it is an open-access journal. The originals published in this journal are the property of the Complutense University of Madrid and any reproduction thereof in full or in part must cite the source. All content is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 use and distribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This circumstance must be expressly stated in these terms where necessary. You can view the summary and the complete legal text of the licence.
