Characterizing cognitive learning preferences among first-year university students in Mexico City

Keywords: Cognitive style, learning, university, undergraduate student

Abstract

Introduction: Students develop cognitive preferences for learning. Empirical evidence suggests that the changes in educational modality brought about by the COVID-19 lockdowns have altered learning patterns. Consequently, a study aimed at optimizing academic processes is needed. General objective: To identify the cognitive learning preferences of first-year university students and examine their relationship with five variables: academic term (X1), field of knowledge (X2), reading speed (X3), reading comprehension (X4), and gender (X5), before, during, and after the COVID-19 lockdowns. Method: Research was conducted between 2017 and 2024 at a university in Mexico City, involving 9,220 first-year students, (52,31 men and 47,69% women), from five fields of knowledge. The study followed a quantitative, non-experimental, and retrospective design with a correlational approach. The phenomenon was observed in its natural context without manipulating the variables. The instrument used was the Honey-Alonso Learning Styles Questionnaire. Results and Discussion: Students of all genders predominantly displayed a Reflective learning style across all fields of knowledge, with the Active style being the least prevalent. The Reflective-Theoretical combination was the most dominant learning style. Correlations between Y1 and X3, X4 revealed higher scores among Reflective learners. Relationships between Y1 and X1, X2 showed a predominance of the Reflective style before and during lockdowns. After returning to in-person learning, the Reflective-Theoretical association became more prominent. A decline in reading speed (X3) and reading comprehension (X4) was observed over time. Conclusion: The findings indicate that certain fields of knowledge tend to favor specific cognitive learning style; learning styles shifted in trend and pattern across both genders during the transition from in-person to virtual learning; and negative correlations were found between learning style and the reading-related variables during the study period.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Mónica del Carmen Meza Mejía, Universidad Panamericana. Escuela de Pedagogía

Dra en Ciencias de la educación por la Universidad de Navarra. Investigadora Nacional, nivel 1. Profesora Titular "C". Profesora-investigadora de la Escuela de Pedagogía de la Universidad Panamericana. México. Socia titular del Consejo Mexicano de Investigación Educativa (COMIE). Miembro de la Sociedad Mexicana de Educación Comparada (SOMEC). 

Erika Xóchitl Rangel Barajas, Universidad Panamericana

Licenciada en Pedagogía por la Universidad Panamericana y maestra en Neuropsicología y Educación por la misma universidad. Actualmente, trabaja como Coordinadora de Innovación Educativa en Smart Center, de la UP, campus México. Su experiencia se ha enfocado en el diagnóstico para la admisión de aspirantes para ingresar a la universidad, así como en la valoración de detección en problemas en el aprendizaje. También cuenta con un diplomado en Educación Especial por la UDLA, Ciudad de México (proceso y dificultades en el aprendizaje de la escritura, lectura y matemáticas, entre otros) haciéndola experta en Counseling, educativo y emocional. Se ha especializado en Orientación Vocacional por parte de Centro Internacional de Psicología y Psicoterapia Cognitiva Comportamental en Argentina. 

María Fernanda Haro Álvarez, Universidad Panamericana

Master en Asesoría Educativa Familiar en la Universidad Complutense de Madrid, profesor en la Universidad Panamericana, miembro del ecosistema de innovación educativa de la Universidad Panamericana.

View citations

Crossmark

Metrics

Published
2025-10-01
How to Cite
Meza Mejía M. d. C., Valadez García A. ., Rangel Barajas E. X. y Haro Álvarez M. F. (2025). Characterizing cognitive learning preferences among first-year university students in Mexico City. Revista Complutense de Educación, 36(4), 433-446. https://doi.org/10.5209/rced.96433
Section
Articles