Stance and Dialogicity in Academic and Professional Writing

Keywords: positioning, voice, academic and professional writing, procedural description

Abstract

How much leeway is there for ‘authorial voice’ in such a constrained and concise text as the description of a standard engineering procedure? This article examines the strategies deployed by fourth-year aeronautical and aerospace students from the Universidad Politécnica de Madrid for building their own academic ethos and transmitting an impression of credibility and reliability. The scrutiny of an electronic corpus of over 300 samples of individual authorship and 76 of collaborative writing, all of them written in English and for the compulsory subject English for Professional and Academic Communication, reveals that these inexperienced writers position themselves regarding content and audience by transgressing formal conventions, resorting to expressions of subjectivity (hedges, boosters and attitudinal markers of various sorts), adopting a greater or lesser degree of metadiscursive deference to the reader and graduating spatiotemporal and modal distances.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Carmen Sancho Guinda, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

Carmen   Sancho   Guinda is Senior Lecturer in the Department of Linguistics   Applied   to   Science   and   Technology   at the Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Spain, where she teaches English for Academic and Professional   Communication   and   in-service   seminars   for   engineering teachers   undertaking   English-medium instruction.   Her   research interests comprise the interdisciplinary study of academic and professional discourses and genres and the teaching and learning of academic literacies.

View citations

Crossmark

Metrics

Published
2023-02-09
How to Cite
Sancho Guinda C. (2023). Stance and Dialogicity in Academic and Professional Writing. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación, 93, 17-37. https://doi.org/10.5209/clac.85563