Submissions

Author Guidelines

We welcome submission of article proposals and reviews of essential (and not tangentially) linguistic content, whether from a theoretical or applied perspective. The reception of proposals is open throughout the year. All submissions will be made through the platform, for which you have to register on it. If you have already performed this action previously, you can login in directly and start managing your submission. Publication in CLAC is completely free.

We ask you to pay close attention and correctly fill out the information that the platform will ask you for in the process of sending your proposal. It is very important that the metadata entered in this process is accurate, as it will be what appears on the journal's website if the work is published.

If you have any technical problems during this phase, or at any time while your work is in press, write an email to prod.ediciones@ucm.es and explain your case.

CLAC's editorial team meets periodically, approximately every two o three months, and determines which of the proposals received go on to external evaluation and which do not. Until then, your proposal will appear as "Submission". We would appreciate it if you could wait patiently until the aforementioned meeting is held.

Date of last meeting: June 13, 2024.

Once the submission has been made, the communications that the author wants to make will be directed only to the editor assigned to their proposal and through the platform, not email. Likewise, we would ask you not to ask us questions that you could obtain answers to by simply carefully reading these guidelines, since the answers you would obtain via email or platform would be the same as those that appear here.

Proposals accepted by the committee are assessed by editorial team members and invited experts. The duration of the peer review process is highly variable, as it depends on a) whether there are evaluators willing to do the work and b) whether the evaluators who have agreed to review the texts meet the deadlines. Each editor will put their best effort into this process, but delays may occur. We also ask you to be patient regarding this point. Once the work has been accepted for publication, the editorial committee of the journal will decide when the work will be published.

We also accept proposals for the coordination of thematic issues. If this is your case, write an email to circulo@ucm.es and explain your proposal.

The publication of monographs will be carried out prior presentation of a formal proposal by the coordinator, which will be evaluated by the editorial board of the journal. In case of acceptance of the proposal, the coordinating person will act as guest editor, coordinating the review and publication process. At the end of the process, the editorial board of the journal will be in charge of giving the final approval to the proposal for its publication in the journal.

Submissions must include five files:

a) An anonymous file in rtf or word with the manuscript.
b) An anonymous file in pdf with the manuscript.
c) A file with the author's data in rtf or word with the manuscript.
d) A file with the author's data in pdf with the manuscript.
e) A very brief CV of the author or authors.

f) In the case of reviews, sending a file containing an image of the cover of the reviewed work will be appreciated.

All images, tables, graphs and annexes must be included in the files indicated above. None of these items should be sent as a separate file.

Incomplete submissions will be automatically rejected.

At the beginning of each proposal you should include:

a) The title of the work.
b) The name of the author/s, as well as their affiliation, their email address and their ORCID number. These last three pieces of information must be included in a footnote. All this information should be omitted in the anonymous versions.
c) An abstract and four key words in the language in which the work is written (German, Catalan, Spanish, French, English, Italian, Portuguese or Basque; other languages ​​can be proposed).
d) The title, abstract and four keywords in English (and also, where appropriate, in Chinese). In papers originally written in English, a summary in that language is sufficient. Keywords must be separated by semicolons.
e) A summary, called contents, in body text of the numbered sections that make up the proposal. Example: 1. Introduction. 2. State of the question. 3. Methodology. 4. Analysis. 4.1. Qualitative. 4.2. Quantitative. 5. Discussion. 6. Conclusions. Acknowledgments. CREdiT author statement. Bibliographic references.
f) Titles of the sections. Number the sections up to a third level (1.2.3.). Do not number the bibliographical references section or the acknowledgments section and the CREdiT author statement section.

We recommend that you consult an article from the last published issue so that you can see graphically how to proceed.

Format. There are no specific rules regarding typeface, size, or line spacing. The team of layout designers will be in charge, when the time comes, to introduce the necessary corrections.

Extension. The length of the reviews will be from 2000 to 8000 words and that of the articles, from 6000 to 10,000. If you have any other extension proposal, you can consult it with the editorial team of the journal.

Inclusive language. CLAC is committed to equality between men and women, which is why it supports the use of linguistic techniques and procedures in this direction. 

Citation. It will be done according to APA Standards. Always include the DOI identifier in the final bibliographical references. The DOI identifier must be included not only in the articles, but also in the chapters of collective volumes and monographs that have it. If you have doubts about whether a reference has a DOI identifier, you can consult it here. In addition, you must always include the full first name of the authors of the referenced works.

Examples. They should be indented and numbered in parentheses.

Footnotes. Except for the exception listed above, do not include footnotes or endnotes. If you want to include acknowledgments, do so in a final section, prior to the bibliography.

Metadata. When you enter the platform, you will have to complete a series of points in the different windows that you pass through. It is very important that all the data you include is correct and complete, since these will be the ones that appear on the journal's website if your article or review proposal is published. Modifying these once the work is published is very complicated.

Support agencies. It is necessary to specify the support agency, project or research group to which your work is attached. Please remember to include this information in the existing section of the platform for this purpose. Also, record that information within your own manuscript. To do this, create a specific section, called "Acknowledgments" before the bibliographical references. In it, in addition to the information already entered, you can include mentions of a more personal nature.

Articles with more than one author. Articles written by several authors must include a new section at the end (after the acknowledgments and before the bibliographical references), entitled "CREDIT Authorship Contribution", in which the specific contribution of each author or author from the CREdiT role taxonomy. For more information on this issue, see the following link. Remember to enter this information only in the versions of your article with author data.

Number of proposals sent. It is only possible to have one proposal per author in the evaluation process or accepted without publishing. Until the job is published or a response is given, a new submission cannot be made.

Suspension of the evaluation process and rejection of the article proposal. The editorial committee of CLAC will make up to four attempts for the manuscript sent by the author to be reviewed. If at the end of these attempts the work has not been evaluated, the article proposal will be rejected. Likewise, repeated non-attention to the editor's messages during the evaluation process will be grounds for rejection of the proposal. Rejected papers may not be resubmitted.