The metaphysical dimensions ignored by neostoicism
Abstract
A new model of practical stoicism, or neo-stoicism, has been spreading in our society for last two decades. That proposal presents Greek and Roman Stoicism as a form of therapy for healing and normalizing citizens.
This theory is based on two risky presupossitions: his narcissistic individualism and the aims to implement Zeno’s or Marcus Aurelius’ teachings under capitalist ideological tendencies. Against this framework, classical Stoicism defended cosmopolitanism and a philosophy that did not seek merely practical ends but rather the assimilation of the subject to the logos. In this way, the Panaetius’ or Posidonius’ Stoicism was metaphysical, that is, it sought the ascent of the subject to reason or cosmic vision rather than achieving uncritical adaptation to the system.
This article aims to reveal the errors of neostoicism and concludes by calling for a shift from the ethical-moral vision of neostoicism to the metaphysical perspective of Stoicism.
Downloads
Article download
License
In order to support the global exchange of knowledge, the journal Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofia is allowing unrestricted access to its content as from its publication in this electronic edition, and as such it is an open-access journal. The originals published in this journal are the property of the Complutense University of Madrid and any reproduction thereof in full or in part must cite the source. All content is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 use and distribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This circumstance must be expressly stated in these terms where necessary. You can view the summary and the complete legal text of the licence.







