Hobbes and natural sociability: considerations on a historiographical and anthropological topic
Abstract
In this article, I will analyze an underrated topic in Hobbes's political thought: the natural sociability. This subject has been neglected since Hobbes is traditionally regarded to deny natural sociability. I do not intend to reject that Hobbes mainly understands political sociability as artificial and conventional. I want to comment the passages in which natural sociability appears in Hobbes's works. The natural sociability appears in two ways. First, I will examine the basic psychological type –the vain– which is characterized for being socially natural. Second, I will describe the four natural societies included in Hobbes's works. Family, the natural coalition against who is regarded to be the naturally strongest, the military group, defensive or aggressive, of short duration and the social situation created after the collapse of civil society. The principal consequence of my interpretation is that, although Hobbes was well aware of natural sociability, he considered it as being incapable of attaining the peace, qualitative and total, which is specifically desired by Modern politics
Downloads
Article download
License
In order to support the global exchange of knowledge, the journal Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofia is allowing unrestricted access to its content as from its publication in this electronic edition, and as such it is an open-access journal. The originals published in this journal are the property of the Complutense University of Madrid and any reproduction thereof in full or in part must cite the source. All content is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 use and distribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This circumstance must be expressly stated in these terms where necessary. You can view the summary and the complete legal text of the licence.







