Título en inglés: Slavoj Žižek: Repeating Bakunin
Abstract
Abstract: The question that underpins this entire article concerns the type of subject that is concealed behind the formal requirements of the act in Žižek's philosophy. Who are the implicit empirical subjects in his concept of the act? The act is an act without a subject, it has no causal explanation. And yet, if it does not offer a positive notion with specific contours and a concrete content, there is an implicit sociological dimension. Where does that ‘concrete universality’ lie sociologically? If the most immediate effect of what Žižek calls ‘postmodernism’ is the depoliticisation of the economy, who is the repoliticising agent? What place might they occupy today for the ‘proletariat position’? We argue that while Žižek proposes repeating Lenin versus economistic concepts, his view of the lumpen as the ‘universal individual’ situates him closer to Bakunin than to Marx, as he sees a potential revolutionary subject in excluded figures.
Downloads
Article download
License
In order to support the global exchange of knowledge, the journal Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofia is allowing unrestricted access to its content as from its publication in this electronic edition, and as such it is an open-access journal. The originals published in this journal are the property of the Complutense University of Madrid and any reproduction thereof in full or in part must cite the source. All content is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 use and distribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This circumstance must be expressly stated in these terms where necessary. You can view the summary and the complete legal text of the licence.