Gundissalinus’s Shadows on the Summa Halensis
Abstract
Dominicus Gundissalinus’s contribution to the history of medieval philosophy has been meaningful especially in reason of its originality and syncretism. However, scholarship has only partially explored the explicit reception of Gundissalinus’s works in the 13th century. This article discusses this aspect from a methodological point of view and through the examination of a specific case: the influence of Gundissalinus’s works on the Summa Halensis. After having discussed the main problems related to assessing Gundissalinus’s impact on the 13th century, the article details some meaningful examples of explicit influence on Roger Bacon and Thomas of York. The last part of the article examines how the authors of the Summa Halensis used Gundissalinus’s De unitate et uno and a possible example of implicit influence of other works by Gundissalinus on the Summa.
Downloads
Article download
License
In order to support the global exchange of knowledge, the journal Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofia is allowing unrestricted access to its content as from its publication in this electronic edition, and as such it is an open-access journal. The originals published in this journal are the property of the Complutense University of Madrid and any reproduction thereof in full or in part must cite the source. All content is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 use and distribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This circumstance must be expressly stated in these terms where necessary. You can view the summary and the complete legal text of the licence.