The government of Bermudo II (982-999) stands out as the most critical moment of the rebellion movements during Astur-Leonese Kingdom. The different historiographical contributions have tried to explain what kind of motivations lead to certain individuals to commit these actions, while the repressions exercised by the monarchy have barely attracted the attention of researchers because they are understood as natural cause of the punishment to the seditious. In this paper, I will try to analyse the different categories of the seditions and their consequences according to a diachronic context and to the construction of patronage networks with the purpose of confirm or deny the presumed central authority fragility image during the second half of the 10th century

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/elem.94756
Keywords: insubordination, repression, “commissos”, “mandaciones”, local powers, central authority, negotiation

Abstract

The government of Bermudo II (982-999) stands out as the most critical moment of the rebellion movements during Astur-Leonese Kingdom. The different historiographical contributions have tried to explain what kind of motivations lead to certain individuals to commit these actions, while the repressions exercised by the monarchy have barely attracted the attention of researchers because they are understood as natural cause of the punishment to the seditious. In this paper, I will try to analyse the different categories of the seditions and their consequences according to a diachronic context and to the construction of patronage networks with the purpose of confirm or deny the presumed central authority fragility image during the second half of the 10th century

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
View citations

Article download

Crossmark

Metrics

Published
2024-05-16
How to Cite
Escudero Manzano G. J. . (2024). The government of Bermudo II (982-999) stands out as the most critical moment of the rebellion movements during Astur-Leonese Kingdom. The different historiographical contributions have tried to explain what kind of motivations lead to certain individuals to commit these actions, while the repressions exercised by the monarchy have barely attracted the attention of researchers because they are understood as natural cause of the punishment to the seditious. In this paper, I will try to analyse the different categories of the seditions and their consequences according to a diachronic context and to the construction of patronage networks with the purpose of confirm or deny the presumed central authority fragility image during the second half of the 10th century. En la España Medieval, 47, 171-188. https://doi.org/10.5209/elem.94756
Issue
Vol. 47: Monograph: Social mobility in the Iberian kingdoms and the Northwestern Mediterranean during the late Middle Ages: new perspectives
Section
Articles

License

In order to support the global exchange of knowledge, the journal En la España Medieval is allowing unrestricted access to its content as from its publication in this electronic edition, and as such it is an open-access journal. The originals published in this journal are the property of the Complutense University of Madrid and any reproduction thereof in full or in part must cite the source. All content is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 use and distribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This circumstance must be expressly stated in these terms where necessary. You can view the summary and the complete legal text of the licence.

En la España Medieval is an open access journal that does not charge authors for article processing (submission, review or editing) or publication.