Rethinking Meaning. Variations on Peirce and Wittgenstein
Abstract
This text is a theoretical reflection on meaning (to represent or communicate), inspired by previous conversations with Wenceslao Castañares. Following a chain of variations on proposals by Peirce, Wittgenstein, and their followers, it is argued that, to position the 'interpreter' as the key to semiosis, one cannot pivot on the subjective-mental nor exclude it, but must refer to sociocultural regulations, embodied as a habit. But, if we do not want to fall into a paradox, this regulations must be supported by public criteria for its application and by very general and implicit, but semiotically active, practical, interactive and material conditions. Meaning (semiosis) is, therefore, a continuous process, internal to the unfolding of existence, and it is jointly constituted with subjectivities and objectualities.
Downloads
Article download
Crossmark
License
In order to support the global exchange of knowledge, the journal CIC. Cuadernos de Información y Comunicación is allowing unrestricted access to its content as from its publication in this electronic edition, and as such it is an open-access journal. The originals published in this journal are the property of the Complutense University of Madrid and any reproduction thereof in full or in part must cite the source. All content is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 use and distribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This circumstance must be expressly stated in these terms where necessary. You can view the summary and the complete legal text of the licence.
