Giacomo Zabarella: un aristotélico crítico en la era de la revolución científica

José Manuel García Valverde

doi:10.5209/ASHF.56802

Giacomo Zabarella: un aristotélico crítico en la era de la revolución científica

José Manuel García Valverde Universidad de Sevilla

Resumo

Giacomo Zabarella es considerado uno de los aristotélicos más prestigiosos y más influyentes del siglo XVI. Su obra lógica, sus escritos sobre física y sus comentarios, publicados póstumamente, tuvieron un enorme impacto especialmente en las primeras décadas del siglo XVII, y sirvieron como verdaderos manuales con los que se formaron muchos universitarios europeos. Este artículo analiza la figura de Zabarella centrándose en su obra sobre física, el De rebus naturalibus libri XXX, editado en 1590, apenas unos días antes de su muerte.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

##submission.viewcitations##

Referências

Akasoy 2013: A. Akasoy, “Was Ibn Rushd an Averroist? The Problem, the Debate, and Its Philosophical Implications”, en A. Akasoy-G. Giglioni (eds.), Renaissance Averroism and Its Aftermath: Arabic Philosophy in Early Modern Europe, Londres-Nueva York.

Baroncini 1992: G. Baroncini, “L’articolazione del discorso empirico nella filosofia naturale di G. Zabarella, en Id., Forme di esperienza e rivoluzione scientifica, Florencia.

Bayle 1820: P. Bayle, Dictionnaire Historique et Critique, XV, Paris.

Bianchi 2003: L. Bianchi, “Una caduta senza declino? Considerazioni sulla crisi dell’aristotelismo fra Rinascimento ed età moderna, en L. Bianchi, Studi sull’aristotelismo del Rinascimento, Padua, pp. 133-172.

Biard 2005: Joël Biard, “Tradition et innovation dans les commentaires de la Physique: l‘exemple de Jacques Zabarella,” en La transmission des savoirs au Moyen Âge et à la Renaissance, vol. 2 (Alfredo Perifano ed.) Besancon-Paris, pp. 289-300.

Bouillon 1999: D. Bouillon, “Un discours inédit de Iacopo Zabarella préliminaire à l’exposition de la ‘Physique’ d’Aristote (Padoue 1568),” en Atti e Memorie dell’Accadema Galileiana di Scienze, Letter ed Arti in Padova, 111(3), pp. 119-127.

Bouillon 2009: D. Bouillon, L’interprétation de Jacques Zabarella le Philosophe, Paris.

Cassirer 1906: E. Cassirer, Das Erkenntnisproblem in der Philosophie und Wissenschaft der neueren Zeit, I, Berlin.

Claessens 2012: G. Claessens, “Francesco Piccolomini on Prime Matter and Extension,” en Vivarium, 50, pp. 225-244.

Craig 2011: M. Craig, Renaissance Meteorology: Pomponazzi to Descartes, Baltimore.

Cranz 1976: E. Cranz, “The Renaissance Reading of the De anima,” en Platon et Aristote à la Renaissance: XVIe Colloque international de Tours, Paris, pp. 359-376.

Dal Pra 1966: M. Dal Pra, “Una oratio programmatica di G. Zabarella [Padua 1585: MS Milano BAmbr. D.48i.inf. (xvi), fs. 1-4],” en Rivista critica di storia della filosofia, 21, pp. 286-290.

De Bellis 1997: E. De Bellis, Il pensiero logico di Agostino Nifo, Lecce.

Di Napoli 1963: G. Di Napoli, L’immortalità dell’anima nel Rinascimento, Turin.

Edwards 1960: W. F. Edwards, “The Averroism of Jacopo Zabarella (1533-1589),” en Aristotelismo padovano e filosofia aristotelica, Florence, 1960, pp. 91-107.

Edwards 1960: W. F. Edwards, The Logic of Jacopo Zabarella (1533-1589) (diss. Columbia University, New York.

Edwards 1967: W. F. Edwards, “Randall on the Development of Scientific Method in the School of Padua: a Continuing Reappraisal,” en Naturalism and Historical Understanding: Essays on the Philosophy of John Herman Randall, Jr., New York.

Edwards 19691: W. F. Edwards, “A Note on Galileo’s Poem, Against the Aristotelians,” en Telos, 4.

Edwards 19692: W. F. Edwards, “Jacopo Zabarella: a Renaissance Aristotelian’s View of Rhetoric and Poetry and Their Relation to Philosophy,” en Arts libéraux et philosophie au moyen âge: Actes du IVe Congrès international de philosophie médiévale, Montreal 1967, Montreal-Paris, pp. 843-854.

Gilbert 1960: N. W. Gilbert, Renaissance Concepts of Method, New York.

Gilbert 1963: N. W. Gilbert, “Galileo and the School of Padua,” en Journal of the History of Philosophy, 1, pp. 223-231.

Gilbert 1967: N. Gilbert, “Renaissance Aristotelianism and Its Fate: Some Observations and Problems”, en Naturalism and Historical Understanding: Essays on the Philosophy of John Herman Randall Jr., New York.

Imperialis 1640: I. Imperialis, Musaeum historicum et physicum, Venetiis, apud Iunctas.

Jardine 1976: N. Jardine, “Galileo’s Road to Truth and the Demonstrative Regress,” en Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 7, pp. 277-318.

Jardine 1988: N. Jardine, “Epistemology of the Sciences,” en The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy, (C. B. Schmitt, et al. eds.), Cambridge, pp. 685-711.

Jardine 1997: N. Jardine, “Keeping Order in the School of Padua: Jacopo Zabarella and Francesco Piccolomini on the Offices of Philosophy,” en Method and Order in

Renaissance Philosophy of Nature. The Aristotle Commentary Tradition, (D. Di Liscia, E. Kessler and C. Methuen, eds.), Aldershot, pp. 183-209.

Jardine 2000: “Epistemology of the Sciences”, en The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy, (C. B. Schmitt, et al. eds.), Cambridge, pp. 685-712.

Kessler 1988: E. Kessler, “The Intellective Soul,” en The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy, (C. B. Schmitt, et al. eds.), Cambridge, pp. 485-534.

Kessler 1998: E. Kessler, “Zabarella, Jacopo (1533-1589),” en Routledge Encyclopedia of

Philosophy, vol. 9, (E. Craig ed.), London and New York, pp. 836-839.

Kessler 2011: E. Kessler, “Alexander of Aphrodisias and his Doctrine of the Soul. 1400 Years of Lasting Significance,” en Early Science and Medicine, 16, pp. 1-93.

Kneale 1962: W. and M. Kneale, The Development of Logic, Oxford.

Kristeller 1979: P. O. Kristeller, Renaissance Thought and its Sources, New York.

Kuhn 2002: H. C. Kuhn, “Chartaceous Presence, Material Impact: Works by Paduan Aristotelians in German Libraries (a Bibliometric Study)”, en La presenza dell’aristotelismo padovano nella filosofia della prima modernità, (Gregorio Piaia ed.), Roma-Padua, pp. 83-122.

Kusukawa 2002: S. Kusukawa, “Meditations of Zabarella in Nortern Europe: the Preface of Johann Ludwig Hawenreuter,” en La presenza dell’aristotelismo padovano nella filosofía della prima modernità, (Gregorio Piaia ed.), Roma-Padua, pp. 199-213.

Lines 2002: D. A. Lines, Aristotle’s Ethics in the Italian Renaissance (ca. 1300-1650). The Universities and the Problem of Moral Education, Leiden, Boston and Köln.

Lohr 1982: Ch. H. Lohr, “Renaissance Latin Aristotle Commentaries: Authors So-Z”, en Renaissance Quarterly, 32(2), pp. 233-243.

Maclean 2002: I. Maclean: “Meditations of Zabarella in Northern Germany, 1586-1623,” en La presenza dell’aristotelismo padovano nella filosofia della prima modernitá, (Gregorio Piaia ed.), Roma-Padua, pp. 173-198.

Martin 2007: C. Martin, “Rethinking Renaissance Aristotelianism,” en Intellectual History Review, 17(1), pp. 3-19.

Mikkeli 1992: H. Mikkeli, An Aristotelian Response to Renaissance Humanism. Jacopo Zabarella on the Nature of Arts and Sciences, Helsinki.

Mikkeli 1997: H. Mikkeli, “The Foundation of An Autonomous Natural Philosophy: Zabarella on the Classification of Arts and Sciences,” en Method and Order in Renaissance Philosophy of Nature. The Aristotle Commentary Tradition, (D. Di Liscia, E. Kessler and C. Methuen eds.) Aldershot, pp. 211-228.

Mikkeli 1999: H. Mikkeli, “Jacopo Zabarella (1533-1589). Ordnung und Methode der wissenschaftlichen Erkenntnis,” en Philosophen der Renaissance, (P. Richard Blum ed.), Darmstadt, pp. 150-160.

Mikkeli 2002: H. Mikkeli, “Zabarella and Piccolomini in Scandinavian Countries in the Seventeenth Century,” en La presenza dell-aristotelismo padovano nella filosofia della prima modernità, (G. Piaia ed.), Roma-Padova, pp. 257-272.

Mikkeli 2010: H. Mikkeli, “Jacopo Zabarella (1533-1589): The Structure and Method of Scientific Knowledge,” en Philosophers of the Renaissance, (P. Richard Blum ed.), Washington D.C., pp. 181-191.

Mikkeli 2012: Mikkeli, Heikki, «Giacomo Zabarella», en The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2012 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/zabarella/>.

Mitrovic 2009: B. Mitrovic, “Defending Alexander of Aphrodisias in the Age of the Counter- Reformation: Iacopo Zabarella on the Mortality of the Soul according to Aristotle,” en Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, 91, pp. 330-354.

Nardi 1945: B. Nardi, Sigieri di Brabante nel pensiero del Rinascimento italiano, Rome.

Nardi 1958: B. Nardi, Saggi sull’aristotelismo padovano dal secolo XIV al XVI, Florence.

Palmieri 2007: P. Palmieri, “Science and Authority in Giacomo Zabarella,” en History of Science, 45, pp. 404-427.

Petersen 1921: P. Petersen, Geschichte der Aristotelischen Philosophie in Deutschland, Leipzig.

Poppi 19701: A. Poppi, Introduzione al’aristotelismo padovano, Padua.

Poppi 19702: A. Poppi, La Struttura del sapere in Giacomo Zabarella, Padua.

Poppi 19721: A. Poppi, “L’interpretazione dell’intelletto agente nell’opera di Giacomo Zabarella,” en Scritti in onore di Carlo Giacon, Padua, pp. 323-338.

Poppi 19722: A. Poppi, La Dottrina della scienza in Giacomo Zabarella, Padua.

Poppi 1997: A. Poppi, “La struttura del discorso morale nell’opera di Iacopo Zabarella,” en Antonino Poppi, L’etica del rinascimento tra Platone e Aristotele, Napoli, pp. 231.246.

Poppi 20011: A. Poppi, “Iacopo Zabarella o l’aristotelismo come scienza rigorosa,” en A.

Poppi, Ricerche sulla teologia e la scienza nella Scuola padovana del Cinque e Seicento, Soveria Mannelli, pp. 125-152.

Poppi 20012: A. Poppi, “Metodo e tecnica in Iacopo Zabarella,” en A. Poppi, Ricerche sulla teologia e la scienza nella Scuola padovana del Cinque e Seicento, Soveria Mannelli, pp. 153-166.

Poppi 2004: A. Poppi, “Zabarella, or Aristotelianism as a Rigorous Science,” en The Impact of Aristotelianism on Modern Science, (R. Pozzo ed.), Washington D.C., pp. 35-63.

Pozzo 1998: R. Pozzo, “Res considerata and modus considerandi rem: Averroes, Aquinas, Jacopo Zabarella, and Cornelius Martini on Reduplication,” en Medioevo, 24, pp. 151-175.

Ragnisco 1887: P. Ragnisco, “Pietro Pomponazzi e Giacomo Zabarella nella questione dell’anima,” en Atti del R. Istituto Veneto di scienze, lettere ed arti, 6. pp. 949-996

Randall 1940: J. H. Randall, “The Development of Scientific Method in the School of Padua,” en Journal of the History of Ideas, 1.

Randall 1960: J. H. Randall, Aristotle, New York-London.

Randall 1961: J. H. Randall, The School of Padua and the Emergence of Modern Science, Padua.

Renan 1852: E. Renan, Averroès et l’Averroisme, Paris.

Risse 1964: W. Risse, “Averroismo e alessandrinismo nella logica del Rinascimento,” en Filosofia, 15, pp. 15-30.

Rossi 1983: P. Rossi, “Aristotelici e ‘moderni’: le ipotesi e la natura,” en Aristotelismo veneto e scienza moderna, (ed. L. Olivieri), Padua, pp. 125-154.

Saitta 1950: G. Saitta, Il pensiero italiano nell’Umanesimo e nel Rinascimento, II: Il Rinascimento, Bologna.

Schmitt 1969: C. B. Schmitt, “Experience and Experiment: a Comparison of Zabarella’s View with Galileo’s in De motu”, en Studies en the Renaissance, 16, pp. 80-138.

Schmitt 1971: C. B. Schmitt, A Critical Survey and Bibliography of Studies on Renaissance Aristotelianism, 1958-1969, Padua.

Schmitt 1983: C. B. Schmitt, Aristotle and the Renaissance, Cambridge, Massachusetts and London.

Schmitt 1988: C. B. Schmitt, “The rise of the philosophical textbook”, en The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy, (C. B. Schmitt, et al. eds.), Cambridge, pp. 792-804.

Sgarbi 2012: M. Sgarbi, “Towards a Reassessment of British Aristotelianism,” en Vivarium, 50, pp. 85-109.

Skulsky 1968: H. Skulsky, “Paduan Epistemology and the Doctrine of the One Mind,” en Journal of the History of Philosophy, 6, pp. 341-361.

South 2002: J. B. South, “Zabarella and the Intentionality of Sensation”, en Rivista di storia della filosofia, 57, pp. 5-25.

South 2005: J. B. South, “Zabarella, Prime Matter, and the Theory of Regressus”, en Graduated Faculty Philosophy Journal, 26.

Spruit 1994: L. Spruit, Species Intelligibilis. From Perception to Knowledge. Vol. I: Classical Roots and Medieval Discussions, Leiden.

Spruit 1995: Leen Spruit, Species Intelligibilis. From Perception to Knowledge. Vol. II: Renaissance Controversies, Later Scholasticism and the Elimination of the Intelligible Species in Modern Philosophy, Leiden.

Spruit 2008: L. Spruit, Renaissance Views of Active Perception, en Theories of Perception in Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy, (S. Knuuttila, P. Kärkkäinen eds.), Dordrecht.

Tomasino 1630: G. Tomasino, Illustrium virorum elogia, Patavii, apud Donatum Pasquardum.

Valverde 2009: J. M. García Valverde, “Introduzione” en A. Nifo, L’immortalità dell’anima, Milán.

Valverde 20121: J. M. García Valverde, “El comentario de Giacomo Zabarella a De anima III, 5: una interpretación mortalista de la psicología de Aristóteles”, en Ingenium, 6, pp. 27-56.

Vasoli 19681: C. Vasoli, La Dialettica e la retorica del’ Umanesimo, Milan.

Vasoli 19682: C. Vasoli, Studi sulla cultura del Rinascimento, Manduria.

Vasoli 2011: C. Vasoli, “Jacopo Zabarella e la ‘natura’ della logica,” en Rivista di storia della filosofia (new series), 66, pp. 1-22.

Wallace 1988: W. A. Wallace, “Traditional natural philosophy”, en The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy, (C. B. Schmitt, et al. eds.), Cambridge, pp. 201-235.

##submission.format##

PDF (Español (España))

##submission.crossmark##

##submission.metrics##

Como Citar

García Valverde J. M. (2017). Giacomo Zabarella: un aristotélico crítico en la era de la revolución científica. Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía, 34(3), 587-609. https://doi.org/10.5209/ASHF.56802

ACM
ACS
APA
ABNT
Chicago
Harvard
IEEE
MLA
Turabian
Vancouver

Baixar Citação

Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

Edição

v. 34 n. 3 (2017)

Seção

Estudios

Licença

La revista Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía, para fomentar el intercambio global del conocimiento, facilita el acceso sin restricciones a sus contenidos desde el momento de su publicación en la presente edición electrónica, y por eso es una revista de acceso abierto. Los originales publicados en esta revista son propiedad de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid y es obligatorio citar su procedencia en cualquier reproducción total o parcial. Todos los contenidos se distribuyen bajo una licencia de uso y distribución Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0 (CC BY 4.0). Esta circunstancia ha de hacerse constar expresamente de esta forma cuando sea necesario. Puede consultar la versión informativa y el texto legal de la licencia.

Giacomo Zabarella: un aristotélico crítico en la era de la revolución científica

Resumo

Downloads

##submission.format##

##submission.crossmark##

##submission.metrics##

Licença

Idioma

Informações

Logos

Plugin de Canal de Divulgação

Enviar Submissão