Natura naturans and natura naturata in Spinoza and David Nieto, Haham of the sephardic community of London at the beginnings of the XVIII century
Abstract
Spinoza’s philosophical system cannot be considered as pantheist, but as panentheist. This article tries to reinforce this thesis by analysing the concepts of Natura naturans and Natura naturata, sometimes confused in the works of the Amsterdam philosopher. A comparison is moreover established between both concepts in Spinoza and David Nieto, the autor of a work entitled De la divina providencia, o sea naturaleza universal o natura naturante, at the same time the differences between the inmanent conceptions of divinity in both autors are remarked.Downloads
Article download
License
In order to support the global exchange of knowledge, the journal Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofia is allowing unrestricted access to its content as from its publication in this electronic edition, and as such it is an open-access journal. The originals published in this journal are the property of the Complutense University of Madrid and any reproduction thereof in full or in part must cite the source. All content is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 use and distribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This circumstance must be expressly stated in these terms where necessary. You can view the summary and the complete legal text of the licence.