Transverse synthesis of the «philosophy» of Parménides (On the controversy of the άλήθειά and of the δόξα or the dawn of the Λόγος )

Abstract

As we said in the Parte I, the works of Heráclito and Parménides we find unknown in their integrity. However, few philosophers have been so commented as them. But this diverse and contradictory critic– of the fragments heraclitanos and of the Poem of Parménides, respectively, instead of clarifying, it has been good to hide even more their genuine philosophical reflections, because many of these writings have either been used to praise Heráclito or Parménides, either to criticize them and to oppose them, or to justify spurious interests. This Part II of our work turns on the interpretations of the doctrine of the •8Zhg4" and of the *`>" in the philosopher of Elea, noticing again that [he/she] will always think about the problem of the doubt regarding the authenticity or falsehood, order and it structures of its fragments like source.