Mr. The Mythological Beginning and Rational Origin of the Concept of “Void” in Presocratic Philosophy
"How Profound Is the Air": Difference and Repetition
Abstract
The traditional explanation of the concept of the “void” (τò κενóν) in ancient philosophy sees it as an invention of Democritus and Leucippus’ atomism or even of the Eleatic Melissus of Samos. In this way the profound reasons that may have led to the necessity of such a concept are concealed, and it seems that it was created ex nihilo. This article intends to discover both the mythological beginning and the rational origin of the concept of “void” in pre-Socratic philosophy, which places it as anteceding the histories told so far. Using two columns that attempt to apprehend the same concept from different points of view, the conclusion will be that the “void” was defined at the beginning as difference and repetition. Contrary to a certain understanding of the history of philosophy that sees “classics” and “moderns” as two separate and even opposing boxes, in the course of this interpretation a dialogue will be established between the pre-Socratic doxography and contemporary philosophers such as Schelling, Hegel, Nietzsche, Heidegger, Schmitt, Irigaray, Derrida or Deleuze.
Downloads
Article download
License
In order to support the global exchange of knowledge, the journal Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofia is allowing unrestricted access to its content as from its publication in this electronic edition, and as such it is an open-access journal. The originals published in this journal are the property of the Complutense University of Madrid and any reproduction thereof in full or in part must cite the source. All content is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 use and distribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This circumstance must be expressly stated in these terms where necessary. You can view the summary and the complete legal text of the licence.