On the rhetorical and philosophical nature of the eschatological myth of Plato’s Gorgias

Keywords: Plato, myth, eschatology, rhetoric, philosophy, confutation
Agencies: AKTIBA-IT: Grupo de Investigación en Prácticas, Aprendizaje y Valores», reconocido por el Gobierno Vasco

Abstract

The Gorgias shows an intense debate on persuasion. One of the theses held by Socrates is that there are two forms of persuasion: one that produces mere belief –πειθὼ πιστευτική– and another one, substantially different, which teaches –πειθὼ διδασκαλική. This article relates these two forms of persuasion to traditional rhetoric and philosophy respectively. Besides, it analyzes the conclusive myth of the Gorgias according to these two forms of persuasion; a myth in which Socrates deals with the fate of souls in the afterlife. The outcome is that the content of the final myth is consistent with the arguments given by Socrates during the previous conversation and that Plato, by using the myth, reflects on the limits of philosophical teaching.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Jonathan Lavilla de Lera, Universidad del País Vasco (UPV-EHU)

Jonathan Lavilla de Lera es doctor en filosofía por la Universidad de Barcelona (UB) con una tesis doctoral sobre el Fedro de Platón. Actualmente es profesor adjunto del Departamento de Filosofía de los Valores y Antropología Social de la Universidad del País Vasco (UPV/EHU) y miembro del Grupo de Investigación AKTIBA-IT.

View citations

Crossmark

Metrics

Published
2024-09-30
How to Cite
Lavilla de Lera J. (2024). On the rhetorical and philosophical nature of the eschatological myth of Plato’s Gorgias. Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía, 41(3), 539-552. https://doi.org/10.5209/ashf.88620
Section
Estudios