Could it be that there is an improper use of reason? Sensibility, understanding and reason (Schelling, Baader, Jacobi
Keywords:
Jacobi, Baader, Schelling, reason, understanding, sensibility, evil.
Abstract
The proposal opposes three authors (Jacobi, Baader and Schelling) in a certain moment of the history of the philosophy on having analyzed the dialog that establishes between them through their respective texts: Ueber gelehrte Gesellschaften, ihren Geist und Zweck (Jacobi, 1807); Ueber die Behauptung: dass kein uebler Gebrach der Vernunft sein könne (Baader, 1807) and Philosophische Untersuchungen über give Wesen der menschlichen Freiheit und die damit zusammenhängenden Gegenstände (Schelling, 1809), in order to answer to the question about if the reason is the causer of the evil, if can exists an evil use of it, or if evil, following the philosophical tradition, has its origin in the sensibility or in the understanding.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Article download
Crossmark
Published
2015-06-03
How to Cite
Carrasco-Conde A. (2015). Could it be that there is an improper use of reason? Sensibility, understanding and reason (Schelling, Baader, Jacobi. Logos. Anales del Seminario de Metafísica, 48, 35-55. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_ASEM.2015.v48.49273
Issue
Section
Articles
License
In order to support the global exchange of knowledge, the journal Logos. Anales del Seminario de Metafísica is allowing unrestricted access to its content as from its publication in this electronic edition, and as such it is an open-access journal. The originals published in this journal are the property of the Complutense University of Madrid and any reproduction thereof in full or in part must cite the source. All content is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 use and distribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This circumstance must be expressly stated in these terms where necessary. You can view the summary and the complete legal text of the licence.
