Georges Grosz and the bad smoke of Moloc
Abstract
Elias Canetti described George Grosz as one more of the characters that Grosz appeared to criticize. This article takes a deeper look at the works and texts through which, between 1919 and 1921, Grosz stripped Expresionism of its mysticism, inverted the Dadaist nihilism, and, made the motifs of Metaphysics a means of political denouncement. Nevertheless, under the aggressive politicalization of his art, Grosz questioned the movements of the masses whatever its tendency was. Here we scrutinize the contradictions of this verism that more than answering to the Call to Order took pleasure in slicing into disorder.Downloads
Article download
License
In order to support the global exchange of knowledge, the journal Anales de Historia del Arte is allowing unrestricted access to its content as from its publication in this electronic edition, and as such it is an open-access journal. The originals published in this journal are the property of the Complutense University of Madrid and any reproduction thereof in full or in part must cite the source. All content is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 use and distribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This circumstance must be expressly stated in these terms where necessary. You can view the summary and the complete legal text of the licence.