Gramsci nelle pieghe della postegemonia. Alcune note critiche sulle radici e le contradizioni di una teoria
Abstract
The following essay introduces a survey on the theory of posthegemony and that part within it, which can be grouped under the definition of the foundational. This area of study is defined by the rejection of the relationship between subalternity and hegemony, declaring the end of the latter. The particularity of posthegemony lies in the root of this idea, derived from the intersection of the idea of subalternity within the Subaltern Studies and the theory of hegemony developed by Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe. From the perspective of the Gramscian studies, the two key conceptions of subalternity and hegemony will be analysed, in particular how they were elaborated in the two mentioned current at the basis of posthegemony. Subsequently, posthegemony itself will be analysed in its two main ramifications, one linked to infrapolitics and the other to the multitude.
Downloads
Article download
License
In order to support the global exchange of knowledge, the journal Res Publica. Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas is allowing unrestricted access to its content as from its publication in this electronic edition, and as such it is an open-access journal. The originals published in this journal are the property of the Complutense University of Madrid and any reproduction thereof in full or in part must cite the source. All content is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 use and distribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This circumstance must be expressly stated in these terms where necessary. You can view the summary and the complete legal text of the licence.