“Hegemonía” y “nacional-popular”, dos categorías gramscianas adulteradas por la teoría populista
Abstract
The use and abuse by the populist theory (Laclau, Mouffe, Errejón) of Antonio Gramsci’s philosophy has led to an erosion, deformation and falsification of a large part of his concepts, subjected to a postmodern mirror game. In this article we would like to show how the populist interpretation of two central categories of Gramscian thought, “hegemony” and “national-popular”, is a good example of this. The main threads that we will follow will be the disconnection with its Leninist matrix, the political emptying of his ideas and an idealistic reductionism.
Downloads
Article download
Crossmark
License
In order to support the global exchange of knowledge, the journal Res Publica. Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas is allowing unrestricted access to its content as from its publication in this electronic edition, and as such it is an open-access journal. The originals published in this journal are the property of the Complutense University of Madrid and any reproduction thereof in full or in part must cite the source. All content is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 use and distribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This circumstance must be expressly stated in these terms where necessary. You can view the summary and the complete legal text of the licence.
