A sociological perception of food: a critical analysis of research developments in the study of food

  • Cecilia Díaz Méndez Universidad de Oviedo
  • Isabel García Espejo Universidad de Oviedo
Keywords: Sociology of Food, food studies, food consumption, Rural Sociology, food homogenaization, food globalization, food inequalities, agrofood system

Abstract

The Sociology of Food is a relatively new area of work which only in recent years has gained international scientific relevance as a discipline of study (Mennell, Murcotrt and van Otterloo, 1992; McIntosh, 1996; Beardsworth and Keil, 1997; Germov and Williams, 2000; Koc, Sumner and Wilson, 2012). The delay in the formation of a specific scientific body is the result of a combination of factors: the diversity of subjects, the methodological difficulties to face a multidimensional field of study, or the scarcity of comparative studies. This paper summarizes how sociology undertakes the study of food. We made a study of the scientific articles on food that have been published in the last 20 years in the journals of Sociology that appear in the Journal Citation Report. This paper allows us to present an overview of the studies on the Sociology of Food at the international level and to make some critical proposals as to their evolution. As a result, we may conclude that the Sociology of Food occupies a specific field of study, although it frequently overlaps the fields of Rural Sociology and Sociology of Consumption.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Cecilia Díaz Méndez, Universidad de Oviedo
Profesora Titular de Sociología del Departamento de Sociología de la Universidad de Oviedo
Isabel García Espejo, Universidad de Oviedo
Profesora Titular de Sociología del Departamento de Sociología de la Universidad de Oviedo

Crossmark

Metrics

Published
2014-04-20
How to Cite
Díaz Méndez C. y García Espejo I. (2014). A sociological perception of food: a critical analysis of research developments in the study of food. Política y Sociedad, 51(1), 15-49. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_POSO.2014.v51.n1.42472