Rosmini on Kant’s Foundation of Ethics

Referências

Allison, H. E. (2004). Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense. New Heaven & London: Yale University Press.

Allison, H. E. (1983). Kant’s Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense. New Heaven & London: Yale University Press.

Allison, H. E. (1968). Kant’s Concept of the Transcendental Object. Kant-Studien, 59(1-4), 165-186.

Augustine (2002). On the Trinity (S. McKenna, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Beck, L. W. (1989). Two Ways of Reading Kant’s Letter to Herz: Comments on Carl. In Eckart Förster (Ed.), Kant’s Transcendental Deductions: The Three ‘Critiques’ and the ‘Opus Postumum’ (pp. 21-26). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Bird, G. (1962). Kant’s Theory of Knowledge: An Outline of One Central Argument in the ‘Critique of Pure Reason’. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Broese, K. (2005). Nietzsches frühe Auseinandersetzung mit Kants Kritizismus. In B. Himmelmann (Ed.), Kant und Nietzsche im Widerstreit (pp. 363-372). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter.

Caimi, M. (2007). Introducción. In Crítica de la razón pura. Buenos Aires: Colihue.

Caro, R. (2021). Del ser al deber ser. La ética ontológica de Antonio Rosmini. Logos. Anales del Seminario de Metafísica, 54 (2), 447-469. https://doi.org/10.5209/asem.78472

Caro, R. (2016). ‘¿Por qué debemos considerar a la persona como fin?’ Rosmini y el segundo imperativo kantiano. In J. M. Navarro Cordón, R. V. Orden & R. Rovira (Eds.), Nuevas perspectivas sobre la filosofía de Kant. Madrid: Escolar y Mayo. http://hdl.handle.net/10641/2916

Caro, R. (2014). El orden del ser: aproximaciones al bien y a la ley natural en Rosmini y Kant. Madrid: E-Prints Complutense. https://eprints.ucm.es/27507/1/T35527.pdf

Cunningham C. (2002). Genealogy of nihilism. London & New York: Routledge.

Doyle, T. (2017). The Kantian Roots of Nietzsche’s Will to Power. In M. Brusotti & H. Siemens (Authors), Nietzsche’s Engagements with Kant and the Kantian Legacy Volume I: Nietzsche, Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics (pp. 205–232). London: Bloomsbury Academic.

Faggiotto, M. (1989). Introduzione alla metafisica kantiana dell'analogia. Milano: Massimo.

Freyenhagen, F. (2011). Empty, Useless, and Dangerous? Recent Kantian Replies to the Empty Formalism Objection. Hegel Bulletin 32(1-2), 163-186. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0263523200000215

Franck, J. F. (2006). From the Nature of the Mind to Personal Dignity. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.

García Norro, J. J. (1994). Consideraciones en torno a la esencia del formalismo ético. Revista de Filosofía, 7(11), 305-315. https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/RESF/article/view/RESF9494120305A

Guyer, P. (2016). Virtues of Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Guyer (1987). Kant and the Claims of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hegel, G. W. F. (1991). Elements of the Philosophy of Rights (H. B. Nisbet, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1820)

Heidegger, M. (1988). The Basic Problems of Phenomenology (A. Hofstadter, Trans.). Bloomington & Indianapolis: Indiana University Press. (Original work published 1975)

Himmelmann, B. (2005). Kant, Nietzsche und die Aufklärung. In B. Himmelmann (Ed.), Kant und Nietzsche im Widerstreit (pp. 29-46). Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.

Jacobi, F. H. (1987). Open Letter to Fichte, 1799 (D. I. Behler Trans.). In E. Behler (Ed.), Philosophy of German Idealism (pp. 119-141). New York: Continuum.

Kant, I. (1902-). In Berlin-Brandenburg Akademie der Wissenschaften (Ed.), Kants gesammelte Schriften. Berlin: de Gruyter. For references to the first Critique, I follow the common practice of giving page numbers from the A (1781) and B (1787) German editions. Otherwise, the citations include the volume and page numbers from the Academy edition. I use the following abbreviations: GMS = Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, KpV = Critique of Practical Reason, KrV = Critique of Pure Reason, Refl = Reflexionen, V-Met = Lectures on Metaphysics, WA = An answer to the question: What is Enlightenment? I employ, with some modifications, the English translations:

Kant, I. (2009). Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason: Background Source Materials (E. Watkins, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kant, I. (2005). Notes and Fragments (P. Guyer, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kant, I. (1998). Critique of Pure Reason (P. Guyer & A. W. Wood, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kant, I. (1996). Practical Philosophy (M. J. Gregor, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Korsgaard, C. M. (1996). Kant’s Formula of Universal Law. In Creating the Kingdom of Ends (pp. 77-105). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Melchiore, V. (1991). Analogia e analisi trascendentale: Linee per una nuova lettura di Kant. Milano: Mursia.

Longuenesse, B. (1998). Kant and the capacity to judge: sensibility and discursivity in the transcendental analytic of the ‘Critique of pure reason’. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Maréchal, J. (1947). Le point de départ de la métaphysique: leçons sur le développement historique et théorique du problème de la connaissance. Cahier IV, Le système idéaliste chez Kant et les postkantiens. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer.

Messina G. (2008), La definizione dei giudizi analitici e sintetici nella “Critica della ragion pura” di Kant e nel “Nuovo Saggio” di Rosmini. In M. Krienke (Ed.), Sulla ragione. Rosmini e la filosofia tedesca (pp. 127-171). Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.

Milbank, J. (2003). Being Reconciled, London & New York: Routledge.

Milbank, J. (1999). Knowledge. The theological critique of philosophy in Hamann and Jacobi. In J. Milbank, C. Pickstock & G. Ward (Eds.), Radical Orthodoxy (pp. 21-37), London & New York: Routledge.

Muratore, U. (2008). L’influsso di Kant sulla filosofia morale rosminiana. In M. Krienke (Ed.), Sulla ragione. Rosmini e la filosofia tedesca (pp. 173-192). Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.

Natterer, P. (2003). Transzendentales Subjekt. In Systematischer Kommentar zur Kritik der reinen Vernunft (pp. 30-42). Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter.

Nebuloni, R. (1992). Amore e morale. Idee per la fondazione dell’etica. Roma: Borla.

Nietzsche, N. (2005). Twilight of the Idols. In A. Ridley & J. Norman (Eds.), The Anti-Christ, Ecce Homo, Twilight of the Idols and Other Writings (pp. 153-229). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1889)

Nocerino, G. (2007). La tensione ontologica della morale nella Teosofia di Rosmini. In M. Dossi & M. Brescia (Eds.), Antonio Rosmini tra modernità e universalità. Omaggio ad Antonio rosmini nel 150º della morte (pp. 155-178). Brescia: Morcelliana.

O’Connor, F. (1990). You Can’t Be Poorer Than Dead. In R. Giroux (Ed.), The Complete Stories (pp. 292-310), London & Boston: Faber and Faber.

O’Neill, O. (1989). Consistency in Action. In Constructions of Reason (pp. 81-104). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ottonello, P. P. (1998). Il mito di Rosmini “Kant italiano. In Rosmini. L’ideale e il reale (pp. 53-66). Venezia: Marsilio.

Paton, H. J. (1965). Kant’s metaphysic of experience; a commentary on the first half of the ‘Kritik der reinen Vernunft’ (Vol. 2). London: Allen & Unwin. (Original work published 1936)

Plato (1975). Phaedo (D. Gallop, Trans.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Prini, P. (1997). Introduzione a Rosmini. Roma-Bari: Laterza.

Prini, P. (1953). Introduzione alla metafisica di Antonio Rosmini. Domodossola: Sodalitas.

Rábade, S. (1969). Kant. Problemas gnoseológicos de la “Crítica de la razón pura”. Madrid: Gredos.

Rosmini, A (1975-). In Istituto di Studi Filosofici & Centro de Studi Rosminiani (Eds.), Opere di Antonio Rosmini. Roma: Città Nuova. Citations will normally be given as paragraph number. I use the following abbreviations: AM = Antropologia in servizio della scienza morale [Anthropology as an Aid to Moral Science], DDN = Del divino nella natura [On the Divine in Nature], L = Logica, NS = Nuovo Saggio sull’origine delle idee [New Essay on the Origin of Ideas], R = Il rinnovamento della filosofia in Italia [The Renewal of Philosophy in Italy], POI = Preliminare alle opere ideologiche [Preamble to the Ideological Works], PSCM = Principi della scienza morale [Principles of Moral Science], SC = Storia comparativa e critica dei sistemi intorno al principio della morale [Comparative and Critical History of Systems dealing with the Principle of Morality], TD = Teodicea [Theodicy], T = Teosofia [Theosophy].

Rosmini, A (1890). Rosmini to Baldassare Poli, 6 February 1837. In Epistolario completo [Complete Epistolary] (Vol. 6). Casale Monferrato: Giovanni Pane.

I employ, with some modifications, the English translations:

Rosmini, A. (2007). Theosophy 1-3 (T. Watson, Trans.). Durham: Rosmini House.

Rosmini, A. (2001a). A New Essay concerning the Origin of Ideas 1 (D. Cleary & T. Watson, Trans.). Durham: Rosmini House.

Rosmini, A. (2001b). Preamble to the Ideological Works 1 (D. Cleary & T. Watson, Trans.). In A New Essay concerning the Origin of Ideas 1 (pp. 409-432). Durham: Rosmini House.

Rosmini, A. (1989). Principles of Ethics (T. Watson & D. Cleary, Trans.). Durham: Rosmini House.

Salaquarda, J. (1978). Nietzsche und Lange. Nietzsche Studien 7(1), 236-253

Sgarbi, M (2011). The Historical Genesis of the Kantian Concept of ‘Transcendental’. Archiv für Begriffsgeschichte 53, 97-117.

Schönecker, D. (2006). How is a Categorical Imperative Possible? Kant’s Deduction of the Categorical Imperative. In C. Horn & D. Schönecker (Eds.), Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (pp. 310-324). Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter.

Smith, N. K. (2003). A commentary to Kant’s ‘Critique of Pure Reason’. New York: Palgrave. (Original work published 1923)

Stern, R. (2015). On Hegel’s Critique of Kant’s Ethics: Beyond the ‘Empty Formalism’ Objection. In Kantian Ethics: Value, Agency, and Obligation (pp. 139-156). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Thomas Aquinas (2019). Summa theologiae. In E. Alarcón (Ed.), Corpus Thomisticum. https://www.corpusthomisticum.org/sth0000.html

Wolff, P. R. (1963). Kant’s Theory of Mental Activity: A Commentary on the Transcendental Analytic of the ‘Critique of Pure Reason’. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.