Should Kant Be Viewed as a Public Philosopher?

Zachary Vereb

doi:10.5209/kant.88692

Should Kant Be Viewed as a Public Philosopher?

Zachary Vereb University of Mississippi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/kant.88692

Palabras clave: Public philosophy, Kant, Enlightenment, Politics

Resumen

Immanuel Kant is rarely appreciated for his contributions to public philosophy. This is unsurprising, given his dry, technical style, criticism of the popular German philosophy movement, and prolonged silence on religious topics following censorship threats from Frederick William II. Yet Kant’s underappreciation vis-à-vis public philosophy is curious: Not only was he a vocal supporter of the early French Revolution, but he also said much on the public and political value of enlightenment. These ideas come across indirectly in his systematic writings and explicitly in writings for the learned public. This paper focuses on the question as to whether Kant should be viewed as a public philosopher, drawing from recent contributions in Kant scholarship to argue for the affirmative, though in an admittedly qualified sense.

Ver citas

Citas

Allison, H. E. (2018), “Kant’s Critique of Spinoza”, in R. Kennington (ed.), The Philosophy of Baruch Spinoza, Catholic University of America Press, pp. 199–228.

Avillez, A.R. de, Fisher, M., Klotz, K., and Long, C. (2016), “Public Philosophy and Philosophical Publics: Performative Publishing and the Cultivation of Community”, The Good Society 24, pp. 118-145.

Baiasu, S. (2022), “The Challenge of (Self-)Consciousness: Kant, Artificial Intelligence and Sense-making”, in H. Kim and D. Schönecker (eds.), Kant and Artificial Intelligence, De Gruyter, pp. 105-127.

Beiser, F. C. (2003), The Romantic Imperative: The Concept of Early German Romanticism, Harvard University Press.

Bishirjian, R. J. (1978), A Public Philosophy Reader, Arlington House Publishers, New Rochelle, New York, USA.

Brister, E. (2022), “The Value of Public Philosophy”, in L. McIntyre, N. McHugh and I. Olasov (eds.), A Companion to Public Philosophy, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Dewey, J., Weber, E. T. (2021), America's Public Philosopher: Essays on Social Justice, Economics, Education, and the Future of Democracy, Columbia University Press, New York, USA.

Fleischacker, S. (2015), “Kant’s Enlightenment”, Con-Textos Kantianos, no. 2, pp. 177-196.

Floyd, J. (2022), “Political Philosophy's Methodological Moment and the Rise of Public Political Philosophy”, Society 59, no. 2, pp. 129-139.

Frodeman, R., Briggle, A. (2015), Socrates Tenured: The Institutions of 21st-Century Philosophy, Rowman & Littlefield International.

Goodin, R. E. (1995), Utilitarianism as a Public Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, New York, USA.

Hammer, M. (2021), “Critique of the Public Sphere: A Kantian Measure of the Enlightenment of Societies” Con-Textos Kantianos 14, pp. 344-368.

Henrich, D. (1967), “Einleitung”, in Dieter Henrich (ed.), Kant—Gentz—Rehberg: Über Theorie und Praxis, Suhrkamp Verlag, Frankfurt am Main.

Hobbs, A. “Public Philosophy and the Civic Duty of Universities”, Daily Nous (2020), https://dailynous.com/2020/06/22/public-philosophy-civic-duty-universities-guest-post-angie-hobbs/, Accessed on November 29, 2022.

Huss, J. (2014), “Popular Culture and Philosophy: Rules of Engagement”, Essays in Philosophy 15, pp. 19-32.

Jal, M., Bawane, J. (2021), The Imbecile's Guide to Public Philosophy, Routledge India, London, UK.

Kant, I. (1996), “An Answer to the Question: What is Enlightenment?”, Practical Philosophy, M. J. Gregor and A. Wood (trans., ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

Kant, I. (1996), “The conflict of the faculties (1798)”, Religion and Rational Theology, M. J. Gregor and R. Anchor (trans.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

Kant, I. (1996), “What does it mean to orient oneself in thinking? (1786)”, Religion and Rational Theology, A. Wood and G. di Giovanni (trans., ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

Kant, I. (1998), Critique of Pure Reason, P. Guyer and A. W. Wood (trans., ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

Kant, I. (2000), Critique of the Power of Judgment., P. Guyer and E. Matthews (trans.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

Kant, I. (2007), Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View (1798), Anthropology, History, and Education, G. Zöller and R. B. Louden (trans., ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

Kegley, J. A. K. (1997), Genuine Individuals and Genuine Communities: A Roycean Public Philosophy, Vanderbilt University Press, Nashville, TN, US.

Kim, T., Dator, J. A. (1999), Co-creating a Public Philosophy for Future Generations, Praeger Publishers, Westport, Connecticut, USA.

Kuehn, M. (1987), Scottish Common Sense in Germany, 1768-1800, McGill-Queen’s University Press, Kingston and Montreal.

Kuehn, M. (2001), Kant: A Biography, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

Kuehn, M. (2006), “Kant’s Critical Philosophy and its Reception – The First Five Years (1781-1786)”, in P. Guyer (ed.), Kant and Modern Philosophy, Cambridge University Press.

Lestition, S. (1993), “Kant and the End of the Enlightenment in Prussia”, The Journal of Modern History 65, pp. 57–112.

Littmann, G. (2014), “Writing Philosophy for the Public is a Moral Obligation”, Essays in Philosophy 15, pp. 103-116.

Lu-Adler, H. (2022), “Kant on Lazy Savagery, Racialized”, Journal of History of Philosophy 60, pp. 253-75.

Maliks, R. (2014), Kant’s Politics in Context, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

McIntyre, L., McHugh, N., and Olasov, I. (eds.) (2022), A Companion to Public Philosophy, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Møller, S. (2017), “Rethinking Kant as a Public Intellectual”, European Journal of Political Theory 16, pp. 100-108.

Payne, C., Thorpe, L. (2011), “Introduction: The Many Senses of Community in Kant”, in C. Payne and L. Thorpe (eds.), Kant and the Concept of Community, University of Rochester Press, Boydell & Brewer, pp. 1-16.

Pinkard, T. (2002), German Philosophy 1760–1860: The Legacy of Idealism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

Posner, R. A. (2001), Public Intellectuals: A Study of Decline, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Pugliucci, M., Finkelman, L. (2014), “The Value of Public Philosophy to Philosophers”, Essays in Philosophy 15, pp. 86-102.

Rinne, P. (2020), “Love and Moral Psychology in Global Politics: A Kantian Reworking of Rawls and Nussbaum”, Con-Textos Kantianos, no. 11, pp. 291-312.

Sandel, M. J. (2005), Public Philosophy: Essays on Morality in Politics, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Vereb, Z. (2022), “Sustaining the Individual in the Collective: A Kantian Perspective for a Sustainable World”, Kantian Review 27, no. 3, pp. 405-420.

Weinstein, J. R. (2014a), “Public Philosophy: Introduction”, Essays in Philosophy 15, pp. 1-4.

Weinstein, J. R. (2014b), “What Does Public Philosophy Do?”, Essays in Philosophy, 15, pp. 33-57.

Williams, H. (2003), Kant’s Critique of Hobbes: Sovereignty and Cosmopolitanism, University of Wales Press, Cardiff, UK.

Wood, A. W. (1996), “Introduction”, In A. W. Wood and G. di Giovanni (eds.), Religion and Rational Theology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

Wurgaft, B. A. “Against Public Philosophy”, Aeon (2021), https://aeon.co/essays/the-dangers-of-public-philosophy-according-to-leo-strauss, Accessed on September 3, 2022.

Wyrębska-Đermanović, E. (2021), “Kantian Moral Education for the Future of Humanity: the Climate Change Challenge”, Journal of Philosophy of Education 55, pp. 1045-1056.

Zweig, A. (1999), “Introduction”, In A. Zweig (ed.), Correspondence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

Descarga artículo

PDF (English)

Crossmark

Métricas

Publicado

2023-07-06

Cómo citar

Vereb Z. (2023). Should Kant Be Viewed as a Public Philosopher?. Con-Textos Kantianos. International Journal of Philosophy, 17, 3-15. https://doi.org/10.5209/kant.88692