Migrant domestic workers, vulnerability and the law: immigration and employment laws in Cyprus and Spain

  • Vera Pavlou European University Institute
Keywords: Paid domestic labour, vulnerability, models of regulation, legal reform, Cyprus, Spain

Abstract

The intersection of gender, welfare and immigration regimes has been one of the main focus of a rich scholarship on paid domestic work in Europe. This article brings into the discussion the nexus of employment and immigration law regimes to reflect on the role of legal regulation in structuring and reducing the vulnerability of domestic workers. I analyse this nexus by looking at the cases of Cyprus and Spain, two states falling under the cluster of Southern Mediterranean welfare regimes, that share certain characteristics in terms of immigration regimes, but have substantially different employment law regulation models. The first part sketches the debate on the employment law regulation of domestic work. The second part starts by giving an overview of the immigration regimes of Cyprus and Spain in relation to migrant domestic workers and then proceeds to analyse the two countries’ models and substance of employment law regulation in domestic work. The comparison of these two divergent approaches informs the debate on how the legal regulation of domestic work should be best structured. In Spain there have been recent dynamic legislative changes in the employment law regulation of domestic work. The final part of the article traces these changes and reflects on why such processes have not taken place in Cyprus.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Vera Pavlou, European University Institute
PhD candidate at the European University Institute (Law Department), Florence.
View citations

Crossmark

Metrics

Published
2016-05-18
How to Cite
Pavlou V. (2016). Migrant domestic workers, vulnerability and the law: immigration and employment laws in Cyprus and Spain. Investigaciones Feministas (Feminist Research), 7(1), 149-168. https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_INFE.2016.v7.n1.52130