Calisto, entre amor hereos y una terapia falaz.
Abstract
From a medical perspective, the debate between Calisto and Sempronio (Celestina, Act 1, .scene 2) reflects a crude, unsympatbetic view of the kind of academic medicine practiced by university-educated physicians during the late Middle Ages. Thus, if Sempronio represents the parodie incamation of the highly respected figure of the medicus gratiosus, bis master, Calisto, is a pathetic personification of the noble afflicted by amor hereos. In fact, Rojas succeeds in showing bis readers how ridiculously ineffective certain therapeutic remedies are in the treatment of such a malady. lo justify the conclusions drawn, the writings of different medical authorities (classical, Arabie and Christian) are referred to.Downloads
Article download
License
In order to support the global exchange of knowledge, the journal Dicenda. Cuadernos de Filología Hispánica is allowing unrestricted access to its content as from its publication in this electronic edition, and as such it is an open-access journal. The originals published in this journal are the property of the Complutense University of Madrid and any reproduction thereof in full or in part must cite the source. All content is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 use and distribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This circumstance must be expressly stated in these terms where necessary. You can view the summary and the complete legal text of the licence.