A feature-inheritance approach to scalar-focus object preposing in English, Mandarin Chinese, and Spanish
- Jiahui Yang Universidad de Sevilla https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1125-4589
Abstract
This paper discusses the syntax of scalar-focus object preposing, which is found compatible with constituent-adverbs but not with adverbs with a sentential scope. Meanwhile, languages such as English and Mandarin Chinese are found to differ in the position to which the scalar-focus object can be preposed. To account for such cross-linguistic structural differences in a unified way, this paper proposes that such an object carries an interpretable [+Max]-feature and agrees with a functional head to value its uninterpretable discourse-feature, before moving to the specifier position of the latter. Based on the theory of Feature Inheritance, it has been further argued that in English, the functional head in question is C, because the discourse-feature is retained by it, while in Mandarin Chinese this head is T, because it inherits the discourse-feature from C. The potential issue of subject-object ordering in this approach has been delt with by considering the nature of movement and the licensing condition of multiple specifiers. Additionally, the universality of the current proposal has been demonstrated by extending the same approach to Spanish.
Downloads
References
Adger, David, and Daniel Harbour. 2008. “Why Phi?” In Phi Theory: Phi-Features across Modules and Interfaces, edited by Daniel Harbour and Susana Béjar, 1–34. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Alleton, Viviane. 1972. Les Adverbes En Chinois Moderne. The Hague: De Gruyter Mouton.
Anderson, Stephen R. 1972. “How to Get Even”. Language 48 (4): 893–906. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/411993
Badan, Linda. 2007. “High and Low Periphery: A Comparison Between Italian and Chinese”. PhD diss., Università degli Studi di Padova.
Badan, Linda, and Francesca Del Gobbo. 2015. “The Even-Construction and the Low Periphery in Mandarin Chinese”. In The Cartography of Chinese Syntax, edited by Wei-Tien Dylan Tsai, 33–74. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210687.003.0002
Bobaljik, Jonathan David, and Dianne Jonas. 1996. “Subject Positions and the Roles of TP”. Linguistic Inquiry 27 (2): 195–236.
Camacho-Taboada, Victoria, and Ángel L. Jiménez-Fernández. 2014. “Focus Fronting and Root Phenomena in Spanish and English”. In Language Use and Linguistic Structure, edited by Joseph E. Emonds and Markéta Janebová, 47–60. Olomouc: Palacký University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5507/ff.14.24440606.03
Chomsky, Noam. 1973. “Conditions on Transformations”. In A Festschrift for Morris Halle, edited by Morris Halle, Stephen R. Anderson, and Paul Kiparsky, 232–285. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Chomsky, Noam. 1976. “Conditions on Rules in Grammar”. Linguistic Analysis 2 (3): 303–351.
Chomsky, Noam. 1977. “On Wh-Movement”. In Formal Syntax, edited by Peter Culicover, Thomas Wasow, and Adrian Akmajian, 71–132. New York: Academic Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures. Berlin: Foris Publications.
Chomsky, Noam. 1982. Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. New York: Praeger.
Chomsky, Noam. 1993. “A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory”. In The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, edited by Ken Hale and Samuel Jay Keyser, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA & London: The MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 1998. Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. “Derivation by Phase”. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, edited by Michael J Kenstowicz, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 2008. “On Phases”. In Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, edited by Robert Freidin, Carlos P Otero, and Maria Luisa Zubizarreta, 132–166. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 2013. “Problems of Projection”. Lingua 130 (June): 33–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2012.12.003
Chu, Chauncey Cheng-hsi. 2003. “Please, Let Topic and Focus Co-Exist Peacefully!” In Huati Yu Jiaodian Xin Lun [New Ideas about Topic and Focus], edited by Liejiong Xu and Danqing Liu, 260–280. Shanghai: Shanghai Education Publisher.
Constant, Noah, and Chloe C. Gu. 2010. “Mandarin ‘Even’, ‘all’ and the Trigger of Focus Movement”. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 16 (1): 21–30.
Ding, Shengshu, Shuxiang Lü, Rong Li, Dexuan Sun, Xiechu Guan, Jing Fu, Shengzhang Huang, and Zhiwen Chen. 1961. Xiandai Hanyu Yufa Jianghua [Lectures on Modern Chinese Grammar]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
É. Kiss, Katalin. 1986. “Parasitic Chains”. The Linguistic Review 5 (1): 41–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.1986.5.1.41
Engdahl, Elisabet. 1983. “Parasitic Gaps”. Linguistics and Philosophy 6 (1): 5–34.
Epstein, Samuel D., Hisatsugu Kitahara, and T. Daniel Seely. 2020. “Unifying Labeling under Minimal Search in ‘Single-’ and ‘Multiple-Specifier’ Configurations”. In Coyote Papers 22: Proceedings of the Arizona Linguistics Circle 13, edited by Remo Nitschke, Damian Y. Romero Diaz, Gabriela De la Cruz-Sánchez, and John W. W. Powell, 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367343699-9
Erlewine, Michael Yoshitaka. 2014. “Movement Out of Focus”. PhD diss., Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Ernst, Thomas, and Chengchi Wang. 1995. “Object Preposing in Mandarin Chinese”. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 4 (3): 235–260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01731510
Fauconnier, Gilles. 1975a. “Polarity and the Scale Principle”. In Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistics Society, edited by Robin E. Grossman, James L. San, and Timothy J. Vance, 11:188–199. Chicago: Chicago linguistic Society.
Fauconnier, Gilles. 1975b. “Pragmatic Scales and Logical Structure”. Linguistic Inquiry 6 (3): 353–375.
Fox, Danny. 1999. “Reconstruction, Binding Theory, and the Interpretation of Chains”. Linguistic Inquiry 30 (2): 157–196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/002438999554020
Frank, Robert, Young-Suk Lee, and Owen Rambow. 1996. “Scrambling, Reconstruction and Subject Binding”. Rivista Di Grammatica Generativa 21: 67–106.
Fukui, Naoki, and Margaret Speas. 1986. “Specifiers and Projection”. In Papers in Theoretical Linguistics, edited by Naoki Fukui, Tova R. Rapoport, and Elizabeth Sagey, 128–172. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.
Gallego, Ángel J. 2007. “Phase Theory and Parametric Variation”. PhD diss., Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Gao, Qian. 1994. “Focus Criterion: Evidence from Chinese”. In Proceedings of the Sixth North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics, edited by José Camacho and Lina Choueiri, 51–73. Los Angeles: University of Southern California.
Giannakidou, A., and Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng. 2006. “(In)Definiteness, Polarity, and the Role of Wh-Morphology in Free Choice”. Journal of Semantics 23 (2): 135–183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffl001
Hirschberg, Julia Bell. 1985. “A Theory of Scalar Implicature”. PhD diss., Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
Hole, Daniel. 2004. Focus and Background Marking in Mandarin Chinese: System and Theory behind Cai, Jiu, Dou and Ye. 1st ed. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203565193
Hu, Jianhua, Haihua Pan, and Liejiong Xu. 2001. “Is There a Finite vs. Nonfinite Distinction in Chinese?” Linguistics 39 (6): 1117–1148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2001.043.
Huang, C.-T. James. 1982. “Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar”. PhD diss., Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Huang, Shi-Zhe. 1996. “Quantification and predication in Mandarin Chinese: A case study of dou”. PhD diss., University of Pennsylvania.
Hukari, Thomas E., and Robert D. Levine. 1991. “On the Disunity of Unbounded Dependency Constructions”. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9 (1): 97–144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133327
Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Jiménez-Fernández, Ángel L. 2010. “Discourse-Agreement Features, Phasal C and the Edge: A Minimalist Approach”. Revista Diacrítica 24 (1): 25–48.
Jiménez-Fernández, Ángel L. 2011. “On the Order of Multiple Topics and Discourse-Feature Inheritance”. Dilbilim Araştırmaları, no. 1: 5–32.
Jiménez-Fernández, Ángel L. 2015. “Towards a Typology of Focus: Subject Position and Microvariation at the Discourse–Syntax Interface”. Ampersand 2: 49–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2015.03.001
Jiménez-Fernández, Ángel L. 2020. Syntax-Information Structure Interactions in the Sentential, Verbal and Nominal Peripheries. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Jiménez-Fernández, Ángel L., and Shigeru Miyagawa. 2014. “A Feature-Inheritance Approach to Root Phenomena and Parametric Variation”. Lingua 145: 276–302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2014.04.008
Karttunen, Lauri, and Stanley Peters. 1979. “Conventional Lmplicature”. In Presupposition, edited by Choon-Kyu Oh and David Allen Dinneeen, 1–56. New York: Academic Press.
Kitagawa, Yoshihisa. 1986. “Subjects in Japanese and English”. PhD diss., University of Massachusetts Amherst.
König, Ekkehard. 1991. The Meaning of Focus Particles: A Comparative Perspective. London & New York: Routledge.
Koopman, Hilda, and Dominique Sportiche. 1982. “Variables and the Bijection Principle”. The Linguistic Review 2 (2): 139–160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.1982.2.2.139
Koopman, Hilda, and Dominique Sportiche. 1985. “Theta-Theory and Extraction”. GLOW Newsletter 14: 57–58.
Krifka, Manfred. 2008. “Basic Notions of Information Structure”. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 55 (3–4): 243–276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/ALing.55.2008.3-4.2
Kuroda, Sige-Yuki. 1988. “Whether We Agree or Not: A Comparative Syntax of English and Japanese”. Lingvisticae Investigationes 12 (1): 1–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/li.12.1.02kur
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lasnik, Howard. 2003. Minimalist Investigations in Linguistic Theory. Routledge Leading Linguists. London: Routledge.
Lebeaux, David. 1988. “Language Acquisition and the Form of Grammar”. PhD diss., University of Massachusetts Amherst.
Lebeaux, David. 2009. Where Does Binding Theory Apply? Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Lee, Thomas Hun-Tak. 1986. “Studies on Quantification in Chinese”. PhD diss., University of California, Los Angeles.
Leonetti, Manuel, and Victoria Escandell-Vidal. 2009. “Fronting and Verum Focus in Spanish”. In Focus and Background in Romance Languages, edited by Andreas Dufter and Daniel Jacob, 155–204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.112.07leo
Li, Charles N., Sandra A. Thompson, and R. McMillan Thompson. 1982. “The Discourse Motivation for the Perfect Aspect: The Mandarin Particle LE”. In Tense-Aspect: Between semantics & pragmatics, edited by Paul J. Hopper, 19–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.1.05li
Li, Yen-hui Audrey. 1985. “Abstract case in Chinese”. PhD diss., University of Southern California.
Liao, Wei‐wen Roger. 2016. “The Top-down and Bottom-up Ways of Getting EVEN in Chinese”. Presented at the 11th Workshop on Formal Syntax and Semantics (FOSS-11), Academia Sinica, 1–2 September.
Lin, Jo-Wang. 1992. “The Syntax of Zenmeyang ‘how’ and Weishenme ‘Why’ in Mandarin Chinese”. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1 (3): 293–331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00130555
Lin, Jo-Wang. 1996. “Polarity licensing and wh-phrase quantification in Chinese”. PhD diss., University of Massachusetts Amherst.
Lin, Jo-Wang. 1998. “Distributivity in Chinese and Its Implications”. Natural Language Semantics 6 (2): 201–243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008299031574
Lin, Jo-Wang. 2003a. “Temporal Reference in Mandarin Chinese”. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 12 (3): 259–311. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023665301095
Lin, Jo-Wang. 2003b. “Selectional Restrictions of Tenses and Temporal Reference of Chinese Bare Sentences”. Lingua 113 (3): 271–302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(02)00089-X
Lin, Jo-Wang. 2006. “Time in a Language Without Tense: The Case of Chinese”. Journal of Semantics 23 (1): 1–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffh033
Lin, Jo-Wang. 2010. “A Tenseless Analysis of Mandarin Chinese Revisited: A Response to Sybesma 2007”. Linguistic Inquiry 41 (2): 305–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2010.41.2.305
Lin, Tzong‐Hong Jonah. 2011. “Finiteness of Clauses and Raising of Arguments in Mandarin Chinese”. Syntax 14 (1): 48–73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9612.2010.00145.x
Lin, Tzong‐Hong Jonah. 2012. “Multiple-Modal Constructions in Mandarin Chinese and Their Finiteness Properties”. Journal of Linguistics 48 (1): 151–186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226711000272
Lin, Tzong‐Hong Jonah. 2015. “Tense in Mandarin Chinese Sentences”. Syntax 18 (3): 320–342. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12032
Liu, Hongni. 2009. “Hanyu Fei Jufa Jiegou de Cihuihua [The Lexicalization of the Non-Syntactic Structures in Chinese]”. PhD diss., Shanghai Normal University.
López, Luis. 2009. A Derivational Syntax for Information Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199557400.001.0001
Lü, Shuxiang, ed. 1980. Xiandai Hanyu Babai Ci [Eight Hundred Words in Contemporary Chinese]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.
Mahajan, Anoop Kumar. 1990. “The A/A-Bar Distinction and Movement Theory”. PhD diss., Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2005. “On the EPP”. In Perspectives on Phases, edited by Martha McGinnis and Norvin Richards, 201–236. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.
Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2010. Why Agree? Why Move? Unifying Agreement-Based and Discourse-Configurational Languages. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2017. Agreement Beyond Phi. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10958.001.0001
Mok, Sui-Sang, and Randall Rose. 1997. “The Semantics and Pragmatics of Dōu: A Non-Quantificational Account”. In The Referential Properties of Chinese Noun Phrases, edited by Liejiong Xu, 141–166. Paris: École des hautes études en sciences sociales, Centre de recherches linguistiques sur l’Asie orientale.
Nevalainen, Terttu. 1991. But, Only, Just: Focusing Adverbial Change in Modern English, 1500-1900. Helsinki: Société néophilologique.
Nissenbaum, Jonathan W. 2000. “Investigations of Covert Phrase Movement”. PhD diss., Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Paris, Marie-Claude. 1979. “Some aspects of the syntax and semantics of the ‘lián...ye/dou’ construction in Mandarin”. Cahiers de linguistique - Asie orientale 5 (1): 47–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/clao.1979.1056
Qu, Yanfeng. 1994. “Object Noun Phrase Dislocation in Mandarin Chinese”. PhD diss., University of British Columbia.
Quer, Josep. 2002. “Edging Quantifiers: On QP-Fronting in Western Romance”. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2000: Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ 2000, Utrecht, 30 November–2 December, edited by Claire Beyssade, Reineke Bok-Bennema, Frank Drijkoningen, and Paola Monachesi, 253–270. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.232.14que
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized Minimality. Linguistic Inquiry Monographs. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Rooth, Mats Edward. 1985. “Association with Focus”. PhD diss., University of Massachusetts Amherst.
Rooth, Mats Edward. 1992. “A Theory of Focus Interpretation”. Natural Language Semantics 1 (1): 75–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02342617
Schwenter, Scott A. 1999. Pragmatics of Conditional Marking: Implicature, Scalarity, and Exclusivity. New York: Garland Publishing.
Shyu, Shu-ing. 1995. “The Syntax of Focus and Topic in Mandarin Chinese”. PhD diss., University of Southern California. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25549/usctheses-c17-472809
Shyu, Shu-ing. 2001. “Remarks on Object Movement in Mandarin SOV Order”. Language and. Linguistics 2 (1): 93–124.
Shyu, Shu-ing. 2004. “(A)Symmetries between Mandarin Chinese Lian...Dou and Shenzhi”. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 32 (1): 81–128.
Shyu, Shu-ing. 2014. “Topic and Focus”. In The Handbook of Chinese Linguistics, edited by C ‐T James Huang, Y ‐H Audrey Li, and Andrew Simpson, 100–125. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781118584552.ch5
Shyu, Shu-ing. 2018. “The Scope of Even: Evidence from Mandarin Chinese”. Language and Linguistics 19 (1): 156–195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00006.shy
Smith, Carlota S., and Mary S. Erbaugh. 2005. “Temporal Interpretation in Mandarin Chinese”. Linguistics 43 (4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2005.43.4.713
Sybesma, Rint. 1996. “Review of ‘The Syntax of Focus and Topic in Mandarin Chinese’ by Shyu Shu-Ing”. GLOT International 2: 13–14.
Sybesma, Rint. 2007. “Whether We Tense-Agree Overtly or Not”. Linguistic Inquiry 38 (3): 580–587.
Taglicht, Josef. 1984. Message and Emphasis: On Focus and Scope in English. London: Longman.
Takahashi, Shoichi, and Sarah Hulsey. 2009. “Wholesale Late Merger: Beyond the A/Ā Distinction”. Linguistic Inquiry 40 (3): 387–426. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2009.40.3.387
Tang, Chih-Chen Jane. 1990. “Chinese Phrase Structure and the Extended X’-Theory”. PhD diss., Cornell University.
Tang, Ting-Chi. 2000. “Hanyu de Xianding Ziju Yu Fei Xianding Ziju [Finite and Nonfinite Clauses in Chinese]”. Language and Linguistics 1 (1): 191–214.
Torrego, Esther. 1984. “On Inversion in Spanish and Some of Its Effects”. Linguistic Inquiry 15 (1): 103–129.
Torres Santos, María de las Lourdes. 2021. “The Scalar Focus Operator Hasta: An Experimental Study on Processing Costs in Spanish”. PhD diss., Universität Heidelberg.
Uriagereka, Juan. 1988. “On government”. PhD diss., University of Connecticut.
Urk, Coppe van. 2017. “Why A-Movement Does Not License Parasitic Gaps”. In A Pesky Set: Papers for David Pesetsky, edited by Claire Halpert, Hadas Kotek, and Coppe van Urk, 533–542. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.
Xiang, Ming. 2008. “Plurality, Maximality and Scalar Inferences: A Case Study of Mandarin Dou”. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 17 (3): 227–245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-008-9025-9
Xu, Liejiong, and D. Terence Langendoen. 1985. “Topic Structures in Chinese”. Language 61 (1): 1–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/413419
Yuan, Yulin. 2008. “Fan Yuqi, Dijin Guanxi He Yuyong Chidu de Leixing—Shenzhi He Faner de Yuyi Gongneng Bijiao [Counter-Expectation, Additive Relation and the Types of Pragmatic Scale: The Comparative Analyses of the Semantic Function of Shenzhi and Faner]”. Dangdai Yuyanxue [Contemporary Linguistics] 10 (2): 109–121.
Zhang, Ning. 1997. “Syntactic Dependencies in Mandarin Chinese”. PhD diss., University of Toronto.
Zhang, Ren. 2000. “Think Constructionally: The Case of Lian...Dou... Reopened”. Presented at the International Symposium on Topic and Focus in Chinese, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, 21–22 June.
Article download
Crossmark
License
In order to support the global exchange of knowledge, the journal Complutense Journal of English Studies is allowing unrestricted access to its content as from its publication in this electronic edition, and as such it is an open-access journal. The originals published in this journal are the property of the Complutense University of Madrid and any reproduction thereof in full or in part must cite the source. All content is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 use and distribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This circumstance must be expressly stated in these terms where necessary. You can view the summary and the complete legal text of the licence.
