Gender, Ideology and Conceptual Metaphors: Women and the Source Domain of the Hunt
- María D. López Maestre University of Murcia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7121-4300
Abstract
As a cognitive process, metaphorical reasoning is inevitable, but not necessarily innocent or neutral. It is well known that the conceptual domains of love and sex have received substantial attention within cognitive linguistics. However, a source domain that merits further exploration from a gender ideology perspective is that of the hunt. For this reason, following an approach that links cognitive linguistics with critical discourse analysis this article examines the conceptualisation of love, seduction and the search for a partner/husband through hunting metaphors, focusing on the discursive representation of women and the hunt. In the texts studied the conceptual metaphors love/seduction/the search for a partner or husband is a hunt are activated through metaphorical linguistic expressions with terms such as hunt, chase, pursue, catch, capture, trap etc. Regarding ideology, metaphors are powerful transmitters of folk beliefs and dominant conceptions of femininity and masculinity. Gender values that show man as the privileged sex as well as sexist ideologies supportive of male dominance and female submissiveness have been found to underlie the texts under consideration.
References
Agnew, Margaret Chason and Catherine Hamrick (1996). The Husband-hunting Handbook: Advice and Recipes for Landing the Perfect Man. Birmingham (AL): Crane Hill Publishers.
Ahrens, Kathleen., ed. (2009). Advertising in Politics, Gender and Conceptual Metaphors. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230245235
Anderson, James A., ed. (1989). Communication Yearbook 12. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Barringer, Judith M. (2001). The Hunt in Ancient Greece. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
Bellido Díaz, José A. (2003). Metáforas amatorias en la elegía latina, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Huelva, 203-259.
Bellido Díaz, José A. (2008). Desde Calímaco a Cervantes: Una imagen venatoria en el contexto amoroso. Anales Cervantinos XL, 133-143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3989/anacervantinos.2008.007
Benítez-Castro, Miguel A. and Encarnación Hidalgo-Tenorio (2018). ‘We were Treated very Badly, treated like slaves’: A Critical Metaphor Analysis of the Accounts of the Magdalene Laundries Victims. In Villar-Argáiz, Pilar, ed., 101-127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74567-1_6
Caballero, Rosario and Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano (2009). Ways of perceiving, moving, and thinking: Re-vindicating culture in conceptual metaphor research. Journal of Cognitive Semiotics 5, 1-2: 268-290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem.2013.5.12.268
Cai, Dongman and Alice Deignan (2019). Metaphors and Evaluation in Popular Economic Discourse on Trade Wars. In Navarro i Ferrando, Ignasi, ed., 57-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110629460-004
Cartmill, Matt (1993). A View to Death in the Morning: Hunting and Nature through History. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674029255
Charteris-Black, Jonathan (2004). Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230000612
Charteris-Black, Jonathan (2006). Britain as a Container: Immigration Metaphors in the 2005 Election Campaign. Discourse and Society 17, 5: 563–581. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926506066345
Charteris-Black, Jonathan (2011). Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor, 2nd edition. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230319899
Charteris-Black, Jonathan (2013). Analysing Political Speeches: Rhetoric, Discourse and Metaphor. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-36833-1
Charteris-Black Jonathan (2017). Competition Metaphors & Ideology: Life as a Race. In Wodak, Ruth and Bernhard Forchtner, eds., 202-217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315183718-16
Charteris-Black, Jonathan (2017). Conclusion to Special Edition on Metaphor & Religion. Metaphor and the Social World 7, 1: 122-129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.7.1.08cha
Charteris-Black, Jonathan (2019). Metaphors of Brexit: No Cherries on the Cake? Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28768-9
Chilton, Paul and Mikhail Ilyin (1993). Metaphor in Political Discourse: The Case of the ‘Common European House’. Discourse & Society 4, 1: 7–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004001002
Chilton, Paul (1996). Security Metaphors: Cold War Discourse from Containment to Common European Home. Berne/New York: Peter Lang.
Chilton, Paul (2004). Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203561218
Crespo-Fernández, Eliecer (2017). Sex in Language: Euphemistic and Dysphemistic Metaphors in Internet Forums. London: Bloomsbury.
Degani, Marta, Paolo Frassi and Maria Ivana Lorenzetti, eds. (2016). The Languages of Politics. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Deignan, Alice (2008). Corpus Linguistics and Metaphor. In Gibbs, Raymond W., ed., 280-295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.018
Deignan, Alice (2010). The Evaluative Properties of Metaphors. In Low, Graham, Zazie Todd, Alice Deignan and Lynne Cameron, eds., 357-374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.26.21dei
Deignan, Alice, Jeannette Littlemore and Elena Semino (2013). Figurative Language, Genre and Register. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Demjén, Zsófia, Elena Semino and Veronika Koller (2016). Metaphors for ‘Good’ and ‘Bad’ Deaths: A Health Professional View. Metaphor and the Social World 6: 1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.6.1.01dem
Demmen, Jane, Elena Semino, Zsófia Demjén, Veronika Koller, Andrew Hardie, Paul Rayson and Sheila Payne (2015). A Computer-assisted Study of the Use of Violence Metaphors for Cancer and End of Life by Patients, Family carers and Health Professionals. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 20, 2: 205-231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.20.2.03dem
Eckert, Penelope and Sally McConnell-Ginet (2013, 2nd edition). Language and Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139245883
Emanatian, Michele (1996). Everyday Metaphors of Lust and Sex in Chagga. Ethos 24, 2: 195-236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/eth.1996.24.2.02a00010
Fairclough, Norman (1989). Language and Power. London: Longman.
Fairclough, Norman (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.
Fairclough, Norman and Ruth Wodak (1997). Critical Discourse Analysis. In Van Dijk, Teun A., ed., 258-285.
Fairclough, Norman (2003). Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203697078
Fein, Ellen and Sherrie Schneider (2007, compilation edition). All the Rules: Time-tested Secrets for Capturing the Heart of Mr. Right. New York: Grand Central Publishing.
Flowerdew, John and John E. Richardson, eds. (2018). The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315739342
Fowler, Roger, Bob Hodge, Gunther Kress and Tony Trew (1979). Language and Control. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Gibbs, Raymond W., ed. (2008). The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802
Goatly, Andrew (2007). Washing the Brain- Metaphor and Hidden Ideology. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.23
Goatly, Andrew (2008). Explorations in Stylistics. London: Equinox Publishing.
Gómez Morón, Reyes, Manuel Padilla Cruz, Lucía Fernández Amaya and María de la O. Hernández López, eds. (2009). Pragmatics Applied to Language Teaching and Learning. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Green, C. M. C. (1996a). Terms of Venery: Ars Amatoria I. Transactions of the American Philological Association 126: 221-263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/370178
Green, C. M. C. (1996b). Did the Romans Hunt? Classical Antiquity 15, 2: 222-260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/25011041
Hart, Christopher (2010). Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Science: New Perspectives on Immigration Discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230299009_2
Hart, Christopher, ed. (2011). Critical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.43
Hart, Christopher (2014). Discourse, Grammar and Ideology: Functional and Cognitive Perspectives. London/New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
Hart Christopher (2017). ‘Riots Engulfed the City’: An Experimental Study Investigating the Legitimating Effects of Fire Metaphors in Discourses of Disorder. Discourse and Society 29, 3: 279-298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926517734663
Harto Trujillo, María Luisa (1992). Eneas: Pius cazador de Dido. Anuario de Estudios Filológicos (Universidad de Extremadura) 15: 155-163.
Hendricks, Rose K., Zsófia Demjén, Elena Semino and Lera Boroditsky (2018). Emotional Implications of Metaphor: Consequences of Metaphor Framing for Mindset about Cancer. Metaphor and Symbol 33, 4: 267-279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2018.1549835
Hiraga, Masako K. (1991). Metaphors Japanese Women Live By. Working Papers on Language, Gender and Sexism 1, 1: 38-57.
Hodge, Bob, Gunther Kress and Gareth Jones (1979). The Ideology of Middle Management. In Fowler, Rodger et al., eds., 81-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429436215-5
Jeffries, Lesley (2007). Textual Construction of the Female Body: A Critical Discourse Approach. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230593626
Jeffries, Lesley (2010). Critical Stylistics: The Power of English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-04516-4
Kelly, Liz H. (2006). Smart Man Hunting: The Fast-track Dating Guide for Finding Mr. Right. New York: Citadel Press.
Kenney, E. J. (1970). Doctus Lucretius. Mnemosyne 23, 4: 366-393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156852570X00047
Koller, Veronika (2003). “A Shotgun Wedding”: Co-occurrence of Wars and Marriage Metaphors in Mergers and Acquisitions Discourse. Metaphor and Symbol 17: 179-203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1703_2
Koller, Veronika (2004). Metaphor and Gender in Business Media Discourse. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511286
Koller, Veronika (2014). Cognitive Linguistics and Ideology. In Littlemore, Jeannette and John R. Taylor, eds., 234–252.
Kövecses, Zoltan (2002). Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195145113.001.0001
Lakoff, George (1987). Women, Fire and Dangerous things: What Categories Reveal about the mind. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
Lakoff, George (1991). Metaphor and War: The Metaphor System Used to Justify War in the Gulf. UC Berkeley: Department of Linguistics. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9sm131vj.
Lakoff, George (1995). Metaphor, Morality, and Politics, or, Why Conservatives Have Left Liberals in the Dust. Social Research 62, 2, 177-214. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7vp15113.
Lakoff, George (1996). Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, George and Elisabeth Wehling (2012). The Little Blue Book: The Essential Guide to Thinking and Talking Democratic. New York: Free Press.
Lakoff, George (2004). Don’t Think of an Elephant: Know your Values and Frame the Debate. White River Junction, Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing.
Lakoff, George (2006). Thinking Points: Communicating our American Values and Vision. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Lakoff, George (2009). The Political Mind: A Cognitive Scientist’s Guide to your Brain and its Politics. New York: Penguin.
Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson (1987). The Metaphorical Logic of Rape. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 2, 1: 73-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms0201_5
Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, George and Mark Turner (1989). More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001
Lazar, Michelle M. (2005). Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230599901
Lazar, Michelle M. (2009). Gender, War and Body Politics: A Critical Multimodal Analysis of Metaphor. In Ahrens, K., ed., 209-234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230245235_10
Littlemore Jeannette and John R. Taylor, eds. (2014). The Bloomsbury Companion to Cognitive Linguistics. London: Bloomsbury.
López Maestre, María D. (2000). The Business of Cognitive Stylistics: A Survey of Conceptual Metaphors in Business English. Atlantis XXII, 1, 47-69.
López Maestre, María D. (2009). Immigration and Conceptual Metaphors: A Critical Approach to Ideological Representation. In Gómez Morón, Reyes, Manuel Padilla Cruz, Lucía Fernández Amaya and María de la O. Hernández López, eds., 60–87.
López Maestre, María D. (2015). ‘Man the Hunter’: A Critical Reading of Hunt-based Conceptual Metaphors of Love and Sexual Desire. Journal of Literary Semantics 44, 2: 89-113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jls-2015-0009
López Maestre, María D. (2019). Estudio de las metáforas bélicas para conceptualizar el embellecimiento desde la perspectiva de género: las guerras por la belleza. Cultura, lenguaje y representación / Culture, Language and Representation XXI: 71–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6035/CLR.2019.21.5
López Maestre, María D. and Elisa Ramón (2005). LOVE IS HUNTING: An Exploration into the Use of Conceptual Metaphors in English Poetry. In Otal Campo, José Luis, Ignasi Navarro i Ferrando and Begoña Bellés Fortuño, eds., 87-97.
López Rodríguez, Irene (2007). The Representation of Women in Teenage and Women’s Magazines: Recurring Metaphors in English. Estudios Ingleses de la Universidad Complutense 15: 15-42.
López Rodríguez, Irene (2009). Of women, bitches, chickens and vixens: Animal metaphors for women in English and Spanish. Revista de Estudios Culturales de la Universitat Jaume I / Cultural Studies Journal of Universitat Jaume I VII: 77-100.
López-Roldán, Pedro and Sandra Fachelli (2017). El diseño de la muestra. In López-Roldán Pedro and Sandra Fachelli, Metodología de la Investigación Social Cuantitativa. Bellaterra: Dipòsit Digital de Documents, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Capítulo II.4. Retrieved from: https://ddd.uab.cat/record/185163.
Low, Graham, Zazie Todd, Alice Deignan and Lynne Cameron, eds. (2010). Researching and Applying Metaphor in the Real World. Human Cognitive Processing (26). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.26
Lowndes, Leil (1996). How to Make Anyone Fall in Love with You: 85 Proven Techniques for Success. London: Thorsons.
Mills, Sara (1995). Feminist Stylistics. London: Routledge.
Mills, Sara (2008). Language and Sexism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Muelas Gil, María (2019). Ideology, Metaphor and Persuasion in Times of Elections: A Corpus-based Study of British and Spanish Economic Reports. Complutense Journal of English Studies 27: 223-246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/cjes.63865
Murgatroyd, P. (1984). Amatory Hunting, Fishing and Fowling. Latomus 43: 362-368.
Musolff, Andreas (2015). Metaphor, Nation and the Holocaust: The Concept of the Body Politic. London: Routledge.
Musolff, Andreas (2016a). Political Metaphor Analysis: Discourse and Scenarios. London: Bloomsbury.
Musolff, Andreas (2016b). What can Metaphor Theory Contribute to the Study of Political Discourse? In Degani, Marta, Paolo Frassi and Maria Ivana Lorenzetti, eds., 9-29.
Musolff, Andreas (2017). Truths, Lies and Figurative Scenarios: Metaphors at the Heart of Brexit. Journal of Language and Politics 16, 5: 641-657. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.16033.mus
Navarro i Ferrando, Ignasi (2016). Metaphorical Aspects in Cancer Discourse. In Ordóñez-López, Pilar and Nuria Edo-Marzá, eds., 12-148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783096268-008
Navarro i Ferrando, Ignasi, ed., (2019). Current Approaches to Metaphor Analysis in Discourse. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110629460
Ng, Carl Jon Way (2018). Metaphor. In Flowerdew, John and John E. Richardson, eds., 215-227.
Nichols, Nancy (2008). Secrets of the Ultimate Husband Hunter. Epiphany imprint.
Núñez Perucha, Begoña (2011). Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Linguistics as Tools for Ideological Research: A Diachronic Analysis of Feminism. In Hart, Christopher, ed., 97-117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.43.06nun
O’Brien, Gerald V. (2003). Indigestible Food, Conquering Hordes, and Waste Materials: Metaphors of Immigrants and the Early Immigration Restriction Debate in the United States. Metaphor & Symbol 18, 1: 33–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1801_3
Ordóñez-López, Pilar and Nuria Edo-Marzá, eds., (2016). Medical Discourse in Professional, Academic and Popular Settings. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783096268
Otal Campo, José Luis, Ignasi Navarro i Ferrando and Begoña Bellés Fortuño, eds. (2005). Cognitive and Discourse Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy. Castelló de la Plana: Publicacions de la Universitat Jaume I.
Pacter, Trudi (1994). Yellow Bird. London: Harper Collins Publishers.
Richardson, John E. (2007). Analysing Newspapers: An Approach from Critical Discourse Analysis. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-20968-8_7
Rooney, Anne (1993). Hunting in Middle English Literature. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer.
Santa Anna, Otto (1999). ‘Like an Animal I was Treated’: Anti-immigrant Metaphor in US Public Discourse. Discourse & Society 10, 2: 191–224. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926599010002004
Semino, Elena (2008). Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.015
Semino, Elena, Zsófia Demjén, Jane Demmen, Veronika Koller, Sheila Payne, Andrew Hardie and Paul Rayson (2017). The Online Use of Violence and Journey Metaphors by Patients with Cancer, as Compared with Health Professionals: A Mixed Methods Study. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care 7: 60-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2014-000785
Semino, Elena, Zsófia Demjén, Andrew Hardie, Sheila Payne and Paul Rayson (2018). Metaphor, Cancer and the End of Life: A Corpus-based Study. New York: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315629834
Silaški, Nadežda (2012). Metaphors and Ideology – Gendered Metaphors in Economic Discourse. Gender Studies 11: 207-219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10320-012-0019-4
Simpson, Paul (1993). Language, Ideology and Point of view. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203312612
Simpson, Paul (2002). Stylistics: A Resource Book for Students. London: Routledge.
Steen, Gerard (2007). Finding Metaphor in Discourse: Pragglejaz and Beyond. Cultura, lenguaje y representación/ Culture, Language and Representation 5: 9-25.
Straehle, Carolyn, Gilbert Weiss, Ruth Wodak, Peter Muntigl and Maria Sedlak (1999). Struggle as Metaphor in European Union Discourse on Unemployment. Discourse & Society 10, 1: 67–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926599010001004
Thiébaux, Marcelle (2014). The Stag of Love: The Chase in Medieval Literature. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7591/9780801471537
Thornborrow, J. (1993). Metaphors of Security: A Comparison of Representation in Defence Discourse in Post-cold-war France and Britain. Discourse & Society 4, 1: 99–119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004001006
Toolan, Michael (2001). Narrative: A Critical Linguistic Introduction. London: Routledge.
Trim, Richard (2011). Metaphor and the Historical Evolution of Conceptual Mapping. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230337053
Van Dijk, Teun A. (1985a). Prejudice in Discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Van Dijk, Teun A., ed. (1985b). Discourse and Communication: New Approaches to the Analysis of Mass Media Discourse and Communication. Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110852141
Van Dijk, Teun A. (1987). Communicating Racism. London: Sage.
Van Dijk, Teun A. (1989). Structures of Discourse and Structures of Power. In Anderson, James A., ed., 18-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.1989.11678711
Van Dijk, Teun A. (1991). Racism and the Press. London: Routledge.
Van Dijk, Teun A. (1993). Discourse and Elite Racism. London: Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483326184
Van Dijk, Teun A. (1994). Editorial: Discourse analysis as social analysis. Discourse and Society 5, 2: 163-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926594005002001
Van Dijk, Teun A., ed. (1997). Discourse as Social Interaction. London: Sage.
Van Dijk, Teun A. (1998). Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage.
Van Dijk, Teun. A. (2016). Análisis crítico del discurso. Revista Austral de Ciencias Sociales 30: 203-222. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4206/rev.austral.cienc.soc.2016.n30-10
Van Teeflen, Toine (1994). Racism and Metaphor: The Palestinian–Israeli Conflict in Popular Literature. Discourse & Society 5, 3: 381–405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926594005003006
Villar-Argáiz, Pilar, ed. (2018). Irishness on the Margins. Cham (Switzerland): Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-74567-1
Wodak, Ruth and Bernhard Forchtner, eds. (2017). The Routledge Handbook of Language and Politics. London: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315183718
Format
License
In order to support the global exchange of knowledge, the journal Complutense Journal of English Studies is allowing unrestricted access to its content as from its publication in this electronic edition, and as such it is an open-access journal. The originals published in this journal are the property of the Complutense University of Madrid and any reproduction thereof in full or in part must cite the source. All content is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 use and distribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This circumstance must be expressly stated in these terms where necessary. You can view the summary and the complete legal text of the licence.





