Robert Bellarmine's Controversies and the Oath of Allegiance's discussion with James I
Abstract
In this article, we aim to highlight the importance of Robert Bellarmine and Francisco Suárez in the political-theological debates that arose around the Oath of Allegiance (1606), imposed by King James I of England. In their writings, they elaborated some extraordinarily modern proposals regarding the 'democratic' origin of civil authority and the limits of political power, along with a suggestive and controversial doctrine on the 'indirect power' of the papacy, which sparked enormous debate in 17th-century England, reaching writers such as Thomas Hobbes and Robert Filmer.
Downloads
Article download
Crossmark
License
In order to support the global exchange of knowledge, the journal Res Publica. Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas is allowing unrestricted access to its content as from its publication in this electronic edition, and as such it is an open-access journal. The originals published in this journal are the property of the Complutense University of Madrid and any reproduction thereof in full or in part must cite the source. All content is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 use and distribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This circumstance must be expressly stated in these terms where necessary. You can view the summary and the complete legal text of the licence.
