Universality, factionalism and exclusion. Representative democracy and populist democracy in the work of Nadia Urbinati
Abstract
The political scientist Nadia Urbinati claims that populism is not an anti-democratic movement. Nevertheless, she establishes a contrast between "representative democracy" and "populist" democracy”. The logic proper to the former would be synecdochic (pars pro toto), while the latter would involve a factional logic (pars pro parte). Starting from her definition of representative democracy and by contrasting it with Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe's theory of populism, it will be argued that, far from representing a "disfigurement" of the fundamental democratic principles, populism is built upon the same representative matrix (in which synecdoche plays a central role). It also operates with mechanisms of exclusion shared by the rest of democratic movements.
Downloads
Article download
Crossmark
License
In order to support the global exchange of knowledge, the journal Res Publica. Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas is allowing unrestricted access to its content as from its publication in this electronic edition, and as such it is an open-access journal. The originals published in this journal are the property of the Complutense University of Madrid and any reproduction thereof in full or in part must cite the source. All content is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 use and distribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This circumstance must be expressly stated in these terms where necessary. You can view the summary and the complete legal text of the licence.
