Contractarian Libertarianism of Jan Narveson. Is It Still Libertarianism?

  • Paweł Nowakowski Independent Scholar
Keywords: Ian Narveson, contractarianism, social contract, foundations of libertarianism.

Abstract

This chapter aims at presenting and scrutinizing a contractarian approach to libertarianism, which has been proposed by a Canadian philosopher, Jan Narveson, known as the main proponent of so-called contractarian libertarianism. The chapter begins with the short introduction followed by “Assumptions,” discussing Narveson’s understanding of morality, his critique of Rawlsian methodology and his view on natural law and natural rights. Afterwards, “Social contract: justification, procedure, motives” presents such elements in the philosophy of Narveson as advantages of contractarianism, levels of the social contract and its status, as well as motives of parties being subject to the social contract. The third part, entitled “Critics vs. Narveson” touches on a critical discussion of the subject by other theorists (Tibor R. Machan, John T. Sanders, Leo Groarke). The last section, “Is the Contractarianism of Narveson Libertarianism?” presents the thesis that Narveson’s contractarianism is not a justified basis of libertarianism. Albeit he comes to conclusions agreeable to libertarianism, his philosophy is better labeled as laissez-faire.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article download

Crossmark

Metrics

Published
2016-10-13
How to Cite
Nowakowski P. (2016). Contractarian Libertarianism of Jan Narveson. Is It Still Libertarianism?. Res Publica. Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas, 19(2), 561-582. https://doi.org/10.5209/RPUB.53879