Confederate States or world republic? Contributions to a exegesis of Kant‘s cosmopolitan project
Abstract
This work will attempt to defend two hypothesis: the first one, unlike the interpretation sustained by Habermas and Rawls, affirms that Kant is inclined over the League of States only in the Law of Peoples´s field, and that, once inside of the Cosmopolitan Law, Könisberg’s would proclaim its overcome in shape of a World Republic. The second one is a long way off from those hypothesis that considered by Kant, the only right bearers are the States, and, supported by the Third Definitive Article for Perpetual Peace, shows that, in the Cosmopolitan Law, individuals are the right’s ownersDownloads
Article download
License
In order to support the global exchange of knowledge, the journal Res Publica. Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas is allowing unrestricted access to its content as from its publication in this electronic edition, and as such it is an open-access journal. The originals published in this journal are the property of the Complutense University of Madrid and any reproduction thereof in full or in part must cite the source. All content is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 use and distribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This circumstance must be expressly stated in these terms where necessary. You can view the summary and the complete legal text of the licence.