Foucault 1648
Keywords:
Genealogy, Archeology, Paradigm, Signature, State, Government, War.
Abstract
This paper intends to prove the discrepancies that separate the meanings of archeology and genealogy described by Agamben from those employed by Foucault during his last courses. This aim will be approached from the context of the transformation undergone by the European order around 1648, when the configuration of the classical episteme and the transition from power to government both took place. According to argument, Foucault would still be a representative of an open program for the human and social sciences while Agamben’s project would lead to a de-contextualized hermeneutics.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Article download
Crossmark
Published
2015-01-22
How to Cite
Villacañas J. L. (2015). Foucault 1648. Res Publica. Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas, 24, 11-38. https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/RPUB/article/view/47780
Section
Artículos
License
In order to support the global exchange of knowledge, the journal Res Publica. Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas is allowing unrestricted access to its content as from its publication in this electronic edition, and as such it is an open-access journal. The originals published in this journal are the property of the Complutense University of Madrid and any reproduction thereof in full or in part must cite the source. All content is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 use and distribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This circumstance must be expressly stated in these terms where necessary. You can view the summary and the complete legal text of the licence.
