DE LA HISTORIA DE LOS CONCEPTOS A LA FILOSOFÍA POLÍTICA
Abstract
The aim of this article is the theory of history by R. Koselleck. It sets up how the metaphores of mirrow and horizon work within conceptual history on the basis of the opposition between metaphor and concept which summarizes the antagonism between Koselleck theoretical proyects and Blummemberg’s ones. It explains how the transcendental hypothesis of conceptual history theory are deconstructed pointing out their ontological, antropological and political limits.Downloads
Article download
License
In order to support the global exchange of knowledge, the journal Res Publica. Revista de Historia de las Ideas Políticas is allowing unrestricted access to its content as from its publication in this electronic edition, and as such it is an open-access journal. The originals published in this journal are the property of the Complutense University of Madrid and any reproduction thereof in full or in part must cite the source. All content is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 use and distribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This circumstance must be expressly stated in these terms where necessary. You can view the summary and the complete legal text of the licence.