Manuales de traducción, reinterpretación e indeterminación de la forma lógica
Keywords:
Indeterminacy of translation, Underdetermination of theories, Indeterminacy of logical form, W, V, O, Quine,
Abstract
In this paper we compare the thesis of underdetermination of theories with the thesis of indeterminacy of translation. Drawing upon this comparison, we argue that, in the context of Quine’s philosophy, the thesis of indeterminacy of translation can only be maintained if it is taken as establishing an indeterminacy in the logical form of sentences. Consequently, we contend that Quine lacks a solid argument for indeterminacy of translation.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Article download
Crossmark
Published
2009-03-17
How to Cite
Fajardo C. ., Fernández M. . y Rey D. (2009). Manuales de traducción, reinterpretación e indeterminación de la forma lógica. Revista de Filosofía , 33(2), 87-110. https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/RESF/article/view/RESF0808220087A
Issue
Section
Articles
License
In order to support the global exchange of knowledge, the journal Revista de Filosofía is allowing unrestricted access to its content as from its publication in this electronic edition, and as such it is an open-access journal. The originals published in this journal are the property of the Complutense University of Madrid and any reproduction thereof in full or in part must cite the source. All content is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 use and distribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This circumstance must be expressly stated in these terms where necessary. You can view the summary and the complete legal text of the licence.
