La paradoja del juicio de responsabilidad moral en Temor y Temblor

  • Patricia C. Dip
Keywords: Autonomy, Responsibility, Paradox of faith

Abstract

The main purpose of this article consists in discussing the idea of moral responsibility in Abraham’s case as it is put forward in Fear and Trembling. With this idea in mind, the notion of ethical heteronomy that the author defends is opposed to kantian ethical autonomy. From this viewpoint, religious sacrifice not only cannot but also must not be ethically justified. The discussion is developed considering Kierkegaard’s ideas from the perspective of different contemporary ethical theories.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article download

Crossmark

Metrics

Published
2003-01-01
How to Cite
C. Dip P. . (2003). La paradoja del juicio de responsabilidad moral en Temor y Temblor. Revista de Filosofía , 28(1), 172-195. https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/RESF/article/view/RESF0303120172A
Issue
Vol. 28 No. 1 (2003)
Section
Articles

License

In order to support the global exchange of knowledge, the journal Revista de Filosofía is allowing unrestricted access to its content as from its publication in this electronic edition, and as such it is an open-access journal. The originals published in this journal are the property of the Complutense University of Madrid and any reproduction thereof in full or in part must cite the source. All content is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 use and distribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This circumstance must be expressly stated in these terms where necessary. You can view the summary and the complete legal text of the licence.