La creatividad del imaginario o el imaginario de la creatividad

Keywords: Imaginary, creativity, aesthetics, logic of determination, indeterminacy

Abstract

Castoriadis thought creativity as a fundamental attribute of society. Modernity, heir of the inherited thought centered on the idea of determined (and deterministic) being, omitted its protagonism in favor of a closed dialectic alien to the human will to intervene in the historical course. This creativity, always according to Castoriadis, refers to the being-for-being that announces a potential reality in which the imagination awakens social action from a narrative, spatial and temporal symbolism with which social life identifies itself. The creative dimension of the imaginary corresponds to an ontology of indeterminacy in which being-for-being does not correspond either to determinism or to mere randomness. Today we do not live in times of determinism, but of planned and organized randomness in which a notion of normalized creativity matures, adapted to a gaseous and innocuous aestheticism and to a way of life subjected to urgency and acceleration. Singularity has become a new imperative that breaks and fragments the social will into a myriad of unconnected biographies. The creativity of the imaginary has been inverted into the imaginary of creativity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Ángel Enrique Carretero, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

Profesor invitado. Investigador.

View citations

Crossmark

Metrics

Published
2026-04-22
How to Cite
Carretero Á. E., Sánchez Capdequí C. y Echeverría Esparza P. (2026). La creatividad del imaginario o el imaginario de la creatividad. Política y Sociedad, 63(1), e98816. https://doi.org/10.5209/poso.98816