Political Science and Research: Methods Matter
Abstract
The selection of methodological approaches in political science research has always been surrounded by debate. During the late twentieth century, quantitative analyses were argued to be preferable over qualitative ones. However, this paradigm was gradually demystified thanks to the work done by Brady and Collier (2004) and Goertz and Mahoney (2012). This article starts out by trying to uncouple the existing hierarchy between methods which political science inherited from a classic vision of research in the discipline and proposes some guidelines to face methodological decisions while doing research in the field. After introducing the different research traditions used by researchers in political science, it suggests focusing not only on the research questions, but also taking into account the hypotheses in order to highlight the importance of congruence between theory and methodology.
Downloads
Article download
License
In order to support the global exchange of knowledge, the journal Política y Sociedad is allowing unrestricted access to its content as from its publication in this electronic edition, and as such it is an open-access journal. The originals published in this journal are the property of the Complutense University of Madrid and any reproduction thereof in full or in part must cite the source. All content is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 use and distribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This circumstance must be expressly stated in these terms where necessary. You can view the summary and the complete legal text of the licence.