Two current sociological approaches to The Elementary Forms of Religious Life
Abstract
Durkheim’s book The Elementary Forms of Religious Life were first time published in 1912. Since then, it was matter of an intensive understanding debate, first among sociologists, after, beyond, among anthropologists. Along the last one hundred years from its first edition, the debate seems has been diminished. Why can we observe nowadays the revival of that intensive debate? The aim of this paper is answer that question through the reading of two recent interpretations. In one hand, the approach of Hans Joas, in the other hand, the Anne Rawls one. Both of them are opposed to the Talcott Parson’s reading of the centenarian Durkheim´s book. In the other side, the recent interpretations of Joas and Rawls, are both opposed between them because of the element of the Durkheim’s book each one brings out as innovative is different form the other. The purpose of this work is to make an appraisal of both approaches by making a comparison of their achievements and their limitations.Downloads
Article download
License
In order to support the global exchange of knowledge, the journal Política y Sociedad is allowing unrestricted access to its content as from its publication in this electronic edition, and as such it is an open-access journal. The originals published in this journal are the property of the Complutense University of Madrid and any reproduction thereof in full or in part must cite the source. All content is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 use and distribution licence (CC BY 4.0). This circumstance must be expressly stated in these terms where necessary. You can view the summary and the complete legal text of the licence.