Dolls made in Japan: From Karakuri-ningyō to Danny Choo

  • María Gutiérrez Montañés Universidad de Zaragoza
Keywords: Doll, ningyō, Smart Doll, Japan, Danny Choo

Abstract

Among the many elements that characterize Japan, we cannot fail to mention the doll industry. It was in the Edo period (1603 / 1615-1868) when it reached its peak, this is when the typologies of traditional dolls or ningyō we know today were developed. Most of these pieces fulfill a propitiatory function of good omen, being used as protective amulets against evil spirits, as well as toys, souvenirs or role models. It should be noted that this type of production was maintained during the Meiji (1868-1912) and Taishō (1912-1926) periods until today.

Obviously, as time went on, the materials and manufacturing methods have changed in such a way that we can point out the use of vinyl, resin and other plastics, in addition to the use of molds or even 3D printers. Although, these new dolls are still interpretations of traditional models, adapted to the moment of current Neojaponism, which returns the view to manifestations such as manga and anime to inspire their aesthetic form. In addition, we should mention the incorporation of technological elements, resulting in examples such as the Smart Doll of Danny Choo among many others.

Through this article we want to point out the points of union between tradition and modernity, based on a concrete example such as Smart Doll, a typology that highlights the incorporation of innovation and technology without losing sight of the past.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

María Gutiérrez Montañés, Universidad de Zaragoza

Doctoranda en Historia del Arte por la Universidad de Zaragoza, máster de Estudios Avanzados en Historia del Arte y máster en Formación de Profesorado enEducación Secundaria por la misma universidad.

View citations

Crossmark

Metrics

Published
2020-06-03
How to Cite
Gutiérrez Montañés M. (2020). Dolls made in Japan: From Karakuri-ningyō to Danny Choo. Mirai. Estudios Japoneses, 4, 99-105. https://doi.org/10.5209/mira.67206