A Kantian perspective on moral duty concerning far distant generations: from noumenal freedom to phenomenal law

Alberto Morán Roa

doi:10.5209/kant.99088

A Kantian perspective on moral duty concerning far distant generations: from noumenal freedom to phenomenal law

Alberto Morán Roa University of Castilla-La Mancha https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7100-4971

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/kant.99088

Keywords: Kant, moral duty, sublime, intergenerational justice, legal theory

Abstract

This article carries out a Kantian reading of our possible duties towards future generations. The moral value of this discussion, which at present cannot be dissociated from the phenomenon of climate change, will be analysed under three headings: a comparison with the aesthetically sublime feeling of Enthusiasmus, an assessment of the possibility of establishing moral duties towards an indeterminate object, and a study of the role of culture in moral progress. The possibility of such moral guidance promoting action will then be considered: the obstacles in this respect show the necessity of shifting the discussion of duties towards future generations from the moral to the legal sphere, where Kantian theory shows great potential. This wide-ranging view finally aims to highlight the role of interrelation and co-determination in Kantian dynamic thought.

View citations

References

Arcos Ramírez, F. (2004). “Una lectura del cosmopolitismo kantiano”. Anuario de filosofía del derecho, tomo XXI, monográfico: la filosofía política y jurídica en Kant, pp. 13–38.

Attas, D. (2009) “A Transgenerational Difference Principle”. In Gosseries, Axel & Meyer H., Lukas (Eds.) Intergenerational Justice, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 189–218.

Bandman, B. (1982). “Do future generations have the right to breathe clean air? A note”. Political Theory, 10(1), pp. 95–102.

Barry, B. M. (1989). “Justice between generations”. In Barry. B. M. (Ed.) Democracy, power, and justice, Oxford, Clarendon Press, pp. 494–510.

Birnbacher, D. (2009). “Responsibility for Future Generations–Scope and Limits”. Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae, 7(1), pp. 75–106.

Care, N. S. (1982). Future generations, public policy, and the motivation problem. Environmental Ethics, 4(3), 195–213.

Clewis, R. R. (2018). “The feeling of enthusiasm”. In Sorensen, K. & Williamson, D. (Eds.) Kant and the Faculty of Feeling, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 184–207.

https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316823453

D’Amato, A. (1990). “Do we owe a duty to future generations to preserve the global environment?”. American Journal of International Law, 84(1), pp. 190–198.

https://doi.org/10.2307/2203019

Díaz, R. (2023). “Do moral beliefs motivate action?”. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 26(3), pp. 377–395.

Dierksmeier, C. (2006). “John Rawls on the rights of future generations”. In Tremmel, J. C. (Ed). Handbook of intergenerational justice, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 73–85.

Eterović, I. (2021). “Grounding Responsibility to Future Generations from a Kantian Standpoint”. Environmental ethics, 43(4), pp. 315–337.

https://doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics202211433

Flikschuh, K. (2009). “Kant’s Non-Individualist Cosmopolitanism”. In Heiner F. Klemme (Ed.). Kant und die Zukunft der europäischen Aufklärung, Berlin, New York: De Gruyter, pp. 425–447.

https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110217285.2.425

Gironi, F. (2015). “What Has Kant Ever Done for Us? Speculative Realism and Dynamic Kantianism”. Breaking the Spell: Contemporary Realism Under Discussion, pp. 89–113.

Gironi, F. (2017). “Introduction”. In Gironi, Fabio (Ed.). The Legacy of Kant in Sellars and Meillassoux: Analytic and Continental Kantianism, New York-London, Routledge, pp. 1–20.

Gómez Franco, I. (2022). “Imaginando ecologías futuras: la imaginación kantiana a través de las generaciones”. In Garcés, Marina (Coord.). Ecología de la imaginación. Artnodes, 29.

https://doi.org/10.7238/artnodes.v0i29.393022

González, A. M. (2010). “Kant and a culture of freedom”. ARSP: Archiv für Rechts-und Sozialphilosophie/Archives for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, pp. 291–308.

González, A. M. (2015). “Emoción, sentimiento y pasión en Kant”. Trans/Form/Ação, 38, pp. 75–98.

Herstein, O. J. (2008). “The identity and (legal) rights of future generations”. The George Washington Law Review, 77, pp. 1173–1215.

Heyd, D. (2009) “A Value or an Obligation? Rawls on Justice to Future Generations”. In Gosseries, Axel & Meyer H., Lukas (Eds.) Intergenerational Justice, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 189–218.

Huber, J. (2017). “Cosmopolitanism for Earth dwellers: Kant on the right to be somewhere”. Kantian Review, 22(1), pp. 1–25.

Huda, K. A. (2019). “The Motivation Problem, Future Generations, and the Idea of ‘Leaving the Earth No Worse’”. International Journal of Applied Philosophy, 33(2), pp. 187–202.

Hyde, B. V. E. (2023). “The problem with longtermism”. Ethics in Progress, 14(2), pp. 130–152.

http://doi.org/10.14746/eip.2023.2.9

Jiménez, A. (2018). “Die Metabasen der Begierde und das Gesetzliche: Die Falte des Gefühls als Triebfeder der Moral”. In Vigo, A & González, A. M. (Eds.) Reflexion, Gefühl, Identität im Anschluß an Kant / Reflection, Emotion, Identity. From Kant onwards, Berlin, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, pp. 71–91.

Johnson, L. E. (2003). “Future generations and contemporary ethics”. Environmental Values, 12(4), pp. 471–487.

https://doi.org/10.3197/096327103129341414

Kant, I. AA, Band III-IV, Kritik der reinen Vernunft (1787). Quoted from Guyer, Paul (Ed.) (1998). Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804649

Kant, I. AA, Band IV, Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten (1785). Quoted from Gregor, Mary J. (Ed.) (1996), “Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals”, Practical Philosophy. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 37–108.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813306.007

Kant, I. AA, Band V, Kritik der praktischen Vernunft (1788). Quoted from Gregor, Mary J. (Ed.) (1996). “Critique of Practical Reason”, Practical Philosophy. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 133–272.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813306.010

Kant, I. AA, Band V, Kritik der Urtheilskraft (1790). Quoted from Guyer, Paul (Ed.) (2000), Critique of the Power of Judgement. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804656

Kant, I. AA, Band VI, Die Metaphysik der Sitten (1797). Quoted from Gregor, Mary J. (Ed.) (1996), “The Metaphysics of Morals”, Practical Philosophy. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 353–604.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813306.013

Kant, I. AA, Band VII, Anthropologie in pragmatischer Hinsicht (1798). Quoted from Louden, Robert B. (Ed.) (2007), “Anthropology from a pragmatic point of view”, Anthropology, History and Education, pp. 227–429.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791925.018

Kant, I. AA, Band VII, Der Streit der Fakultäten (1798). Quoted from Gregor, Mary J. (Ed.) (1998), “The Conflict of the Faculties”, Religion and Natural Theology. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 233–328.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814433.007

Kant, I. AA, Band VIII, Idee zu einer allgemeinen Geschichte in weltbürgerlicher Absicht (1784). Quoted from Louden, Robert B. (Ed.) (2007), “Idea for a universal history with a cosmopolitan aim”, Anthropology, History and Education, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 107-120.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791925.010

Kant, I. AA, Band XXIX, Vorlesungen Wintersemester 1784/1785 Moral Mrongovius II.

Kleingeld, P. (1999). “Kant, history, and the idea of moral development”. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 16(1), pp. 59–80.

Kleingeld, P. (2001). “Nature or providence? On the theoretical and moral importance of Kant’s philosophy of history”. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, 75(2), pp. 201–219.

https://doi.org/10.5840/acpq200175216

Korsgaard, C. M. (1996). Creating the kingdom of ends, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174503

Lyotard, J.-F. (1991). Lessons on the analytic of the sublime, Stanford, Stanford University Press.

Lyotard, J.-F. (2009) Enthusiasm: The Kantian critique of history, Stanford, Stanford University Press.

Mathias, M. B. (1999). “Response: The Role of Sympathy in Kant's Philosophy of Moral Education”. Philosophy of Education Archive, 55, pp. 261–265.

Menninghaus, W. (1991). “Zwischen Überwältigung und Widerstand. Macht und Gewalt in Longins und Kants Theorien des Erhabenen”. Poetica, 23(1/2), pp. 1–19.

Menninghaus, W., Wagner, V., Wassiliwizky, E., Schindler, I., Hanich, J., Jacobsen, T., & Koelsch, S. (2019). “What are aesthetic emotions?”. Psychological Review, 126(2), pp. 171–195.

https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000135

Muñoz Sánchez, M.T. (2017). “Validez ejemplar y comunidades de certezas. Kant, Arendt, Wittgenstein sobre el poder de juzgar críticamente”. Isegoría. Revista de filosofía moral y política, 57, pp. 505–531.

https://doi.org/10.3989/iseogia.2017.057.05

Nussbaum, M. (2007). “On moral progress: A response to Richard Rorty”. University of Chicago Law Review, 74, pp. 939–960.

Ojanen, A. (2019). “Climate crisis, intergenerational domination and representation of future generations”. Political Science. Department of Philosophy, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

O’Shea, J. R. (1997). “The needs of understanding: Kant on empirical laws and regulative ideals”. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 5(2), pp. 216–254.

O’Shea, J. R. (2017). “After Kant, Sellars, and Meillassoux: Back to Empirical Realism?”. In Gironi, Fabio (Ed.). The Legacy of Kant in Sellars and Meillassoux: Analytic and Continental Kantianism, New York-London, Routledge, pp. 21–40.

Partridge, E. (1980). Responsibilities to future generations: environmental ethics, Buffalo, Prometheus Books.

Pasek, J. (1992). “Obligations to future generations: A philosophical note”. World Development, 20(4), pp. 513–521.

Pinheiro Walla, A. (2016). “Common possession of the earth and cosmopolitan right”. Kant-Studien, 107(1), pp. 160–178.

https://doi.org/10.1515/kant-2016-0008

Pinheiro Walla, A. (2020). “Kant and climate change: A territorial rights approach”. In Miller, D.E. & Eggleston, B. (eds.). Moral Theory and Climate Change, London, Routledge, pp. 91–115.

Reichenbach, B. R. (1992). “On obligations to future generations”. Public Affairs Quarterly, 6(2), pp. 207–225.

Rotenstreich, N. (1989). “Morality and Culture: A Note on Kant”. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 6(3), pp. 303–316.

Sánchez Madrid, N. (2023). “El marco epistémico de la esperanza y su articulación con la imaginación política: una reflexión a partir del paradigma kantiano”. Rivista Italiana di Filosofia Politica, (5), pp. 15–33. https://doi.org/10.36253/rifp-2121

Schönfeld, M. (2008). “The Green Kant: Environmental Dynamics and Sustainable Policies”. In Pojman, Louis P. and Pojman, Paul (eds.), Environmental Ethics. Boston: Thomson-Wadsworth.

Sherman, N. (2014). “The place of emotions in Kantian morality”. In Cohen, A. (Ed.) Kant on Emotion and Value. London, Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 11–32.

Slaughter, R. A. (1994). “Why we should care for future generations now”. Futures, 26(10), pp. 1077–1085.

Tarsney, C. (2023). “The epistemic challenge to longtermism”. Synthese, 201(6), article number 195.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-023-04153-y

Thompson, D. F. (2010). “Representing future generations: political presentism and democratic trusteeship”. Critical review of international social and political philosophy, 13(1), pp. 17–37.

https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230903326232

Wehofsits, A. (2016). Anthropologie und Moral. Affekte, Leidenschaften und Mitgefühl in Kants Ethik. Berlin, De Gruyter.

https://doi.org/10.1515/kant-2019-4006

Weiss, E. B. (1990). “Our rights and obligations to future generations for the environment”. American Journal of International Law, 84(1), pp. 198–207.

Wenzel, C. H. (2009). “Kant's aesthetics: Overview and recent literature”. Philosophy Compass, 4(3), pp. 380–406.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2009.00214.x

Wood, A. (1970). Kant’s moral religion. Ithaca-London, Cornell University Press.

Zammito, J. H. (1992). The Genesis of Kant’s ‘Critique of Judgment’, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

Article download

Crossmark

Metrics

Published

2025-07-14

How to Cite

Morán Roa A. (2025). A Kantian perspective on moral duty concerning far distant generations: from noumenal freedom to phenomenal law. Con-Textos Kantianos. International Journal of Philosophy, 21, 101-113. https://doi.org/10.5209/kant.99088