On the Significance of the Copernican Revolution: Transcendental Philosophy and the Object of Metaphysics

Riferimenti bibliografici

Allison, H. (2004), Kant's Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense, 2nd ed., Yale University Press, New Haven.

Barnes, J. (1982), The Presocratic Philosophers, Routledge, New York.

Blumenberg, H. (1987), The Genesis of the Copernican World, trans. Robert M. Wallace, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Copernicus, N. (2002), The Revolutions of the Heavenly Spheres, ed. Stephen Hawking, Running Press, Philadelphia.

Cross, F.L. (1937), "Kant's So-Called Copernican Revolution," Mind, vol. 46, no. 182, pp. 214-217.

Friedman, M. (1998), Kant and the Exact Sciences, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

Gibson, M.I. (2011), "A Revolution in Method, Kant's 'Copernican Hypothesis,' and the Necessity of Natural Laws," Kant-Studien, vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 1-21.

Guyer, P. (1987), Kant and the Claims of Knowledge, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Hanson, N.R. (1959), "Copernicus' Role in Kant's Revolution," Journal of the History of Ideas, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 274-281.

Heath, T. (2004), Aristarchus of Samos: The Ancient Copernicus, Dover, Mineoloa, NY.

Kant, I. (1902- ), Kants Gesammelte Schriften, ed. Königlich-Preussische, later Deutsche, Akademie der Wissenschaften, Berlin, De Gruyter.

Kant, I. (1929), Critique of Pure Reason, trans. Norman Kemp Smith, MacMillan, Boston.

Kant, I. (1992), The Conflict of the Faculties, trans. Mary J. Gregor, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.

Kant, I. (1997), Lectures on Metaphysics, trans. and ed. Karl Ameriks and Steve Naragon, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Kant, I. (1999), Correspondence, trans. and ed. Arnulf Zweig, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Kant, I. (2004), Lectures on Logic, trans. and ed. J. Michael Young, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Kant, I. (2004b), Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science, trans. and ed. Michael Friedman Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Kant, I. (2004c), Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, trans. and ed. G. Hatfield, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Kerzsberg, P. (1989), "Two Senses of Kant's Copernican Revolution," Kant-Studien, vol. 80, pp. 63-80.

Kitcher, P. (2011), Kant's Thinker, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Lemanski, J. (2012), "Die Königin der Revolution. Zur Rettung und Erhaltung der Kopernikanischen Wende," Kant-Studien, vol. 103, no. 4, pp. 448-471.

McQuillan, C. (2011), "The History of a Distinction: Sensible and Intellectual Cognition from Baumgarten to Kant," in O. Thorndike (ed.), Rethinking Kant: Volume 3, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 180-199.

Mendelssohn, M. (1972- ), Gesammelte Schriften, Frommann-Holzboog Verlag, Stuttgart.

Paton, H.J. (1937), "Kant's So-Called Copernican Revolution," Mind, vol. 46, no. 183, pp. 365-371.

Russell, B. (2009), Human Knowledge: Its Scope and Limits, Routledge, New York.

Ryall, J.T.W. (2017), A Copernican Critique of Kantian Idealism, Palgrave Macmillan, London.

Schulting, D. (2009), "Kant's Copernican Analogy: Beyond the Non-Specific Reading," Studi Kantiani, vol. 22, pp. 39-65.

Schönecker, D, Schulting, D. and Strobach, N. (2011), "Kants kopernikanisch-newtonische Analogie," Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 497-518.

Smith, N.K. (1913), "The Meaning of Kant's Copernican Analogy," Mind, vol. 22, no. 88, pp. 549-551.

Thoren, V.E. (1990), The Lord of Uraniborg: A Biography of Tycho Brahe, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Watkins, E. (2007), "The Laws of Motion from Newton to Kant," Perspectives in Science, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 311-348.

Westphal, K. (1995), "Does Kant's Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science Fill a Gap in the Critique of Pure Reason?," Synthese, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 43-86.

Zelazny M. and Stark, W. (1987), "Zu Krzysztof Celestyn Mrongovius und seinen Kollegheften nach Kants Vorlesungen," Kant-Forschungen, vol. 1, pp. 279-292.

Zöller, G. (2014), "Wissenschaft und Weisheit: Kant über die Formen der Metaphysik," Con-Textos Kantianos, vol. 1, pp. 66-80.