The 'Ought' and the 'Can'

Riferimenti bibliografici

Allison, H. 1990. Kant's Theory of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Anderson, J. and J. Christman, eds. 2005. Autonomy and the Challenges of Liberalism: New Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Baldwin, T. 2002. 'Kantian Modality'. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Vol. 76: 1-24.

Barcan Marcus, R. 1980. 'Moral Dilemmas and Consistency'. Journal of Philosophy 77:3:121-136.

Blecher, I. S. 2013. 'Kant on Formal Modality'. Kant-Studien 104:1:44-62.

Bok, H. 1998. Freedom and Responsibility. Princeton N.J.: Princeton University Press.

Brown, S. M. Jr. 1950. 'Does Ought Imply Can?'. Ethics 60:4:275-284.

Chituc, V., Henne, P., Sinnot-Armstrong, W., De Brigard, F. 2016. 'Blame, Not Ability, Impacts Moral "Ought" Judgements for Impossible Actions: Toward an Empirical Refutation of "Ought" Implies "Can"'. Cognition 150: 20-25.

Deligiorgi, K. 2016. 'Autonomy in Bioethics'. Symposion 3:2:177-190.

Deligiorgi, K. 2017. 'Interest and Agency'. In: Gabriel, Markus and Rasmussen, Anders Moe, eds. German Idealism Today. De Guyter Verlag. 1-25.

Donagan, A. 1984. 'Consistency in Rationalist Moral Systems'. Journal of Philosophy 81:6:291-309.

Double, R. 1996. Metaphilosophy and Free Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Frankena, William K. 1958. 'Obligation and Motivation in Recent Moral Philosophy', Essays in Moral Philosophy, ed. A. I. Melden. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 40–81.

Griffin, J. 1992. 'The Human Good and the Ambitions of Consequentialism', The Good Life and the Human Good, ed. E. F. Paul, F. D. Miller and J. Paul. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Leech, J. 2010, 'Kant's Modalities of Judgement' European Journal of Philosophy 20:2:260-284

Lemmon, E. J. 1956. 'Review of G. E. M. Anscombe, Aristotle and the Sea-Battle'. Journal of Symbolic Logic 21:4:388-9.

Lewis, D. K. 1973. 'Causation'. Journal of Philosophy. 70: 556–67.

Martin, W. 2007. 'In Defense of bad Infinity'. Hegel Bulletin 55/56:168-187.

Mattey, G. J. 1986. 'Kant's Theory of Propositional Attitudes'. Kant-Studien 77:423-40

Nelkin, D. K. 2011. Making Sense of Freedom and Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

O'Neill. O. 2003. The Inaugural Address: 'Autonomy: The Emperor's New Clothes'. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 77:1 - 21.

Osborne, N. 2016. [thesis University of Lille]

Schiller, F. 'Über Anmut und Wurde'. In Lieselotte Blumenthal and Benno von Wiese, eds. 1943- Schillers Werke Nationalausgabe XXb. Weimar: Hermann Böhlhaus Nachfolger.

Sellars, W. 1956. "Imperatives, Intentions, and the Logic of 'Ought'". In Hector-Neri Castañeda and George Nakhnikian, eds. 1963. Morality and the Language of Conduct. Wayne State University Press.159-214.

Sellars, W. 1966. 'Ought and Moral Principles' Box 36, Folder 8. Wilfrid S. Sellars Papers, 18999-1990. ASP. 1991.01. Special Collections Department. University of Pittsburgh.

Sinnott-Armstrong, W. 1984. 'Ought' Conversationally Implies 'Can''. The Philosophical Review 93:2: 249-261.

Slote, M. 1982. 'Selective necessity and the Free Will Problem'. Journal of Philosophy 79: 5-22.

Stern, R. 2004. 'Does Ought imply Can? And does Kant think it does?'. Utilitas 16 (1): 42-61.

Swank, C. 1985. 'Reasons, Dilemmas and the Logic of 'Ought'. Analysis 45:2: 111-116.

Talbert, M. 2016. 'Symmetry, Rational Abilities, and the Ought-Implies-Can Principle'. Criminal Law and Philosophy 10:283-296.

Timmerman, J. 2013. 'Kantian Dilemmas? Moral Conflict in Kant's Ethical Theory'. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 95: 36-64.

Timmermann, J. 2003. 'Sollen und Können: "Du kannst, denn du sollst" und "Sollen impliziert Können" im Vergleich'. Philosophiegeschichte und logische Analyse 6:113–22.

van Fraassen, B. C. 1973. 'Values and the Heart's Command'. The Journal of Philosophy 70:1: 5-19.

Watkins, E. 2014. 'What is, for Kant, a law of Nature?'. Kant-Studien 105:4: 471-490.

Williams, B. 1973. Problems of the Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wolf, S. 1980. 'Asymmetrical Freedom'. The Journal of Philosophy 77:1