The Cipher of Nature in Kant’s Third Critique: How to Represent Natural Beauty as Meaningful?

  • Moran Godess-Riccitelli University of Potsdam, Germany
Palabras clave: Aesthetic experience, Aesthetic judgment, Critique of Judgment, Figurative language, Morality, Natural beauty

Resumen

What is it that we encountered with in our aesthetic experience of natural beauty? Does nature “figuratively speaks to us in its beautiful forms”,2 to use Kant’s phrasing in the third Critique, or is it merely our way of interpreting nature whether this be its purpose or not? Kant does not answer these questions directly. Rather, he leaves the ambiguity around them by his repeated use of terminology of ciphers when it comes to our aesthetic experience in nature. This paper examines Kant’s terminology of ciphers in the Critique of Judgment and demonstrate through it the intimate link aesthetic experience in natural beauty has with human morality. A link whose culmination point is embodied in the representation of beauty as a symbol of morality.

Biografía del autor/a

Moran Godess-Riccitelli, University of Potsdam, Germany

Dr. Godess-Riccitelli is a post-doctoral fellow at the Institut für Philosophie, Universität Potsdam. Email:

moran.godess@gmail.com

Ver citas

Descarga artículo

Crossmark

Métricas

Publicado
2020-12-10
Cómo citar
Godess-Riccitelli M. (2020). The Cipher of Nature in Kant’s Third Critique: How to Represent Natural Beauty as Meaningful?. Con-Textos Kantianos. International Journal of Philosophy, 12, 338-357. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4304101
Sección
Número monográfico «La teoría estética de Kant» / Special Issue «Kant’s Aestheti