Arthur Ripstein

Orden privado y justicia pública: Kant y Rawls

Arthur Ripstein University of Toronto, Canada

Palabras clave: Orden privado, justicia pública, Estado de Derecho, justicia distributiva, cumplimiento del derecho

Resumen

El presente artículo se ubica en la intersección de dos proyectos más amplios, uno sobre la filosofía política de Kant y otro sobre la relación entre el derecho privado y la justicia distributiva. Utiliza la idea del orden privado de Kant para explicar el lugar del derecho privado en lo que Rawls describe como la “división de la responsabilidad” entre la sociedad y el individuo. Explico por qué el derecho privado es una parte esencial de lo que, para Rawls, es el tema fundamental de la justicia: la estructura coercitiva de la sociedad. Sostengo que el derecho privado no es más que un sistema de límites recíprocos a la libertad, siempre que esos límites sean generales en el sentido correcto. Además, sostengo que la mejor manera de pensar el énfasis de Rawls en la provisión pública de derechos y oportunidades adecuados es en términos paralelos: son condiciones esenciales para la posibilidad misma del cumplimiento de los derechos, porque son los prerrequisitos morales para una esfera pública compartida.

Ver citas

Citas

IaG Idee zu einer allgemeinen Geschichte in weltbürgerlicher Absicht (1784) en AA 08: 15-31.

KrV Kritik der Reinen Vernunft (citada conforme a la paginación original de la primera y segunda ediciones A (1781) y B (1787).

MS RL Metaphysik der Sitten – Rechtslehre (1797) en AA 06: 203-493.

Traducción al español: Kant (2018) La Metafísica de las Costumbres. Técnios (traducción Adela Cortines Orts y Jesús Conill Sancho)

GMS Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten (1785) en AA 04: 387-463.

Bibliografía general

Anderson, Elizabeth S. (1999) "What Is the Point of Equality?" Ethics Vol 109, No 2, pp 287-337

Aristotle (1962) Nicomachean Ethics, The Liberal Arts Press.

Bennett, John G. (2006) “Freedom and Enforcement: Comments on Ripstein”, Virginia Law Review, Vol. 92, No. 7 (Nov.), pp. 1439-1444

Berlin Isaiah (1990) The Crooked Timber of Humanity: Chapters in the History of Ideas. Londres: John Murray Press.

Blake, Michael and Risse, Matthias (2008) “Two Models of Equality and Responsibility”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Vol 38 Issue 2, pp 165-199

Calabresi, Guido (1970) The Cost of Accidents: A Legal and Economic Analysis. Estados Unidos: Yale University Press.

Cohen, G. A. (1989) “On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice” Ethics Vol. 99, No. 4 (Jul.), pp. 906-944

Cohen, G. A. (2000). If You’re an Egalitarian, How Come You’re so Rich? The Journal of Ethics, 4(1/2), 1–26.

Cooter, Robert and Ulen, Thomas (2003) Law and Economics, 4th edition Berkeley: Berkeley Law Books

Dworkin, Ronald (1986) Law's Empire. Cambridge: Belknap Press

Dworkin, Ronald (1997) Freedom's Law. The Moral Reading of the American Constitution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Dworkin, Ronald (2009) Sovereign Virtue. The Theory and Practice of Equality. Estados Unidos: Harvard University Press.

Epstein, Richard A. (1986) “Past and Future: The Temporal Dimension in the Law of Property. Past and Future: The Temporal Dimension in the Law of Property”, Washington University Law Review Vol. 64 Issue 3, pp 667-722

Epstein, Richard A. (1986) “Past and Future: The Temporal Dimension in the Law of Property”, Washington University Law Review, 64, 667

Epstein, Richard A. (1995) Simple Rules for a Complex World. Estados Unidos: Harvard University Press.

Ernest J. Weinrib, (1995) The Idea of Private Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gauthier, David (1979). “David Hume, contractarian” Philosophical Review 88 (1), pp 3-38.

Ginsburg, Ruth Bader (2007) ““A Decent Respect to the Opinions of [Human]Kind”: The Value of a Comparative Perspective in Constitutional Adjudication”, Saint Louis University Public Law Review: Vol. 26: No. 2 , Article 4, pp 187-202

Green, Leon (1960) “Tort Law: Public Law in Disguise”, Texas Law Review. Vol. 38.

Hobbes, Thomas (1991) Leviathan. Cambridge University Press, Richard Tuck (ed.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (1651).

Honoré, Tony (1993) “The Dependence of Morality on Law” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp 1-17

Hume, D. (1978). A treatise of human nature, L. A. Bigge & P. H. Nidditch (Eds.) (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. (1739)

Justine, Burley (ed) (2004) Dworkin and His Critics: With Replies by Dworkin. Wiley-Blackwell Publishing.

Kaplow Louis y Shavell, Steven. (2002) “Fairness Versus Welfare”, The Journal of Legal Studies, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp 331-362

Keating, Gregory C. (2004) “Rawlsian Fairness and Regime Choice in the Law of Accidents”, Fordham Law Review Vol. 72, pp: 1857-1921

Keating, Gregory C. (1996) “Reasonableness and Rationality in Negligence Theory”, Stanford Law Review, Vol. 48, No. 2, pp 311-384

Kordana, Kevin A and Tabachnick, David H (2005) “Rawls and Contract Law”, The George Washington Law Review, Vol. 73 No. 3, pp 598-632

Kordana, Kevin A and Tabachnick, David H, (2003) “Tax and the Philosopher’s Stone”, Virginia Law Review Vol. 89, No. 3, pp 647-678.

Kordana, Kevin A. and Tabachnick, David H. (2006) “On Belling the Cat: Rawls and Tort as Corrective Justice”, Virginia Law Review Vol. 92, No. 7, pp. 1279-1310.

Kromman, Anthony T. (1980) “Contract Law and Distributive Justice”, Yale Law Review Vol. 89, No. 3, pp: 472-511.

Kymlicka, Will (1990) Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Landes, William and Posner, Richard (1987) The Economic Structure of Tort Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Locke, J. (1960). Locke: Two Treatises of Government (Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought) (P. Laslett, Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Markovits, D. (2003). “How Much Redistribution Should There Be?” The Yale Law Journal, Vol. 112, No. 8, pp: 2291–2329.

Murphy, L. B. (1998). “Institutions and the Demands of Justice” Philosophy & Public Affairs, Vol. 27, No. 4, pp: 251–291.

Murphy, Liam, and Nagel, Thomas (2002) The Myth of Ownership: Taxes and Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Nozick, Robert (1974) Anarchy, State and Utopia. Nueva York: Basic Books.

Perry, Stephen (2000) “On the Relationship between Corrective and Distributive Justice” en Horder, Jeremy (ed.) Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence, fourth series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp 237-63

Perry, Stephen (2004) “Ripstein, Rawls and Responsibility”, Fordham Law Review Vol. 72 Issue 5, 1845 -1855

Pogge, Thomas (2004). “Equal liberty for all?” Midwest Studies in Philosophy Vol. 28, No. 1, pp: 266–281.

Pogge, Thomas W. (1995). “Three Problems with Contractarian-Consequentialist Ways of Assessing Social Institutions” Social Philosophy and Policy Vol. 12, No. 2, pp: 241-266.

Posner, Richard A (1993) The Problems of Jurisprudence. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Rawls, John (1982) “Social Unity and Primary Goods”, en Sen, Amartya & Williams, Bernard (eds.) Utilitarism and beyond. Cambridge University Press, pp: 159-186.

Rawls, John (1999a) “Kantian constructivism in moral theory”, en Freeman, Samuel (ed) Collected Papers: John Rawls. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, pp: 303-358

Rawls, John (1999b) “Reply to Alexander and Mussgrave”, en Freeman, Samuel (ed) Collected Papers: John Rawls. Harvard University Press, pp: 232 -254

Rawls, John (1999c) A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rawls, John (2000) Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Rawls, John (2001) Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Harvard University Press.

Rawls, John (2005a) “Power of Citizens and Their Representation” en Rawls, John. Political Liberalism. Cambridge: Columbia University Press.

Rawls, John (2005b) “The Basic Structure as Subject” en Rawls, John. Political Liberalism. Cambridge: Columbia University Press.

Raz, Joseph (1979) “The Rule of Law and its Virtue”, en Raz, Joseph. The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Richard, J. Arneson (1989) “Equality and Equal Opportunity for Welfare”, Philosophical Studies Vol. 56, No. 1, pp: 77 – 93

Ripstein, Arthur (2000) “Three Duties to Rescue: Moral, Civil, and Criminal” Law and Philosophy, Vol. 19, No. 6, pp. 751-779

Ripstein, Arthur (2003) “Authority and Coercion” Philosophy and Public Affairs Vol. 32, Issue 1., pp 2-35

Ripstein, Arthur (2004) “The Division of Responsibility and The Law of Tort”, Fordham Law Review Vol 72, No. 5, 1811 - 1844

Ripstein, Arthur (2006) “Beyond the Harm Principle” Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol. 34, Issue 3, pp 215-245

Ripstein, Arthur (2007a) “As If It Had Never Happened”, William & Mary Law Review Vol. 48 Issue 5 https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr/vol48/iss5/19 (Acceso: Noviembre, 8, 2022)

Ripstein, Arthur (2007b) “Liberty and Equality”, en Ripstein, Arthur (ed.) Ronald Dworkin Cambridge University Press.

Rousseau J.-J. (1972) The social contract. Nueva York: Hafner Publisher (Frankles Charles, ed) (1762)

Santo Tomás (2002) Aquinas: Political Writings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (R. W. Dyson., ed.)

Scanlon, T. M. (1998) What we Owe to Each Other. Estados Unidos: Belknap Press.

Scheffler, Samuel (2003). “What is Egalitarianism?” Philosophy and Public Affairs Vol. 31, No. 1, pp: 5-39.

Sen, Amartya (1980) “Equality of What?”, en The Tanner Lectures on Human Values Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sidgwick, Henry (1907) The Methods of Ethics. Indianapolis: Hackett Pub Co Inc.

Simmons, A. John (1992) The Lockean Theory of Rights. Nueva Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Simmons, A. John (2000) Justification and legitimacy. Essays on rights and obligations. Estados Unidos: Cambridge University Press.

Steyn, J. (2004). “Guantanamo Bay: The Legal Black Hole”, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 53, No. 1, pp: 1–15

Wolff, Jonathan (1998). “Fairness, Respect, and the Egalitarian Ethos” Philosophy and Public Affairs. Vol. 27, No. 2, pp: 97-122.

Zipursky, Benjamin (2002) “The Philosophy of Private Law” en Coleman, Jules & Shapiro, Scott J. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence & Philosophy of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp: 623 – 630

Textos jurídicos:

SCC 42 Case number : 29872 Application Under Section 83.28 of the Criminal Code (Re) 2 S.C.R. 248 Supreme Court of Canada (SCC 248), https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/2156/index.do (Acceso : Noviembre, 8, 2022)

A.2d 267 Rickards v. Sun Oil Co., and five other cases, United States State Supreme Court (New Jersey) 269 (N.J. 1945) https://sites.oxy.edu/whitney/xaccess/ec357/cases/tort/rickards_v_sunoil.htm (Acceso : Noviembre, 8, 2022)

F.2d 50 (1st Cir. 1985) Barber Lines A/S v. M/V Donau Maru United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit No. 84-1851 https://cite.case.law/f2d/764/50/ (Acceso: Noviembre, 8, 2022)

BvR 357/05 Bundesverfassungsgericht [BVerfG] (Tribunal Constitucional Federal de Alemania), Urteil des Ersten Senats vom 15. Februar 2006, Rn. 1-156, http://www.bverfg.de/e/rs20060215_1bvr035705.html (Acceso: Noviembre, 8, 2022)

HCJ 5100/94 Public Committee Against Torture in Israel v. The Government of Israel [1999] IsrSC 53(4) 817, https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl-nat.nsf/0/D14F3F94989B702FC12572D80043927B (Acceso: Noviembre 8, 2022)

QB 569 Weller & Co. and another v. Foot and Mouth Disease Research Institute [1961]

Descarga artículo

PDF
HTML

Crossmark

Métricas

Publicado

2022-12-07

Cómo citar

Ripstein A. (2022). Orden privado y justicia pública: Kant y Rawls. Con-Textos Kantianos. International Journal of Philosophy, 16, 14-55. https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/KANT/article/view/89393