Before (and beyond) Kant’s Paralogisms: Wolff’s Psychologia Rationalis (1734) and Mendelssohn’s Phaedon (1767)

Guillem Sales Vilalta

doi:10.5209/kant.104249

Before (and beyond) Kant’s Paralogisms: Wolff’s Psychologia Rationalis (1734) and Mendelssohn’s Phaedon (1767)

Guillem Sales Vilalta a:1:{s:5:"es_ES";s:48:"Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas";} https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1326-6767

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5209/kant.104249

Palabras clave: Christian Wolff, Moses Mendelssohn, Immanuel Kant, Psychologia Rationalis, Phaedon

Resumen

This paper defends two theses concerning the relationship between Kant’s critique of Rational Psychology and the contributions to this discipline made by Christian Wolff and Moses Mendelssohn, namely: (I) that Wolff’s Psychologia Rationalis (1734) is not in fact vulnerable to Kant’s charges, not only because it seeks to explain empirical data, but more crucially because its most basic explanatory ground is itself derived from experience; and that Mendelssohn’s Phaedon (1767), which Kant regarded as a prime example of Rational Psychology, likewise is not adequately captured by Kant’s critique. To do so, the paper will include: (1) an introduction outlining the topic and its interest; a section on Wolff’s Rational Psychology; (3) an analysis of Mendelssohn’s modification of Wolffian Psychology; and some concluding remarks

Ver citas

Citas

Altmann, A. (1973), Moses Mendelssohn. A biographical study, Routledge and Kegan Paul, USA.

Araujo, S. F.; Pereira, T. C. R.; Sturm, T. (eds.) (2021), The Force of an Idea: New Essays on Christian Wolff’s Psychology, Springer, Germany.

Arndt, H. W. (1965), “Einführung”, en C. Wolff, Op. Cit., pp. 1-102.

Arnsperger, W. (1897), Christian Wolffs Verhältnis zu Leibniz, Felber, Germany.

Beiser, F. (2009), Diotima’s Children: German Aesthetic Rationalism from Leibniz to Lessing, Oxford University Press, United Kingdom.

Blincoe, A. (2012), “The Priority of Reason: Mendelssohn’s Rationalist Aesthetics”, Proceedings of the European Society for Aesthetics, 4, pp. 105-120.

Boer, K. de; Prunea-Bretonnet, T. (eds.) (2021), The Experiential Turn in Eighteenth-Century German Philosophy, Routledge.

Campo, M. (1939), Christian Wolff e il razionalismo precritico, Vita e Pensiero, Italy.

Carboncini, S. (1986), “Christian August Crusius und der Leibniz-Wolffischen Philosophie”, en A. Heinekamp (ed.), Beiträge zur Wirkungsgeschichte von G. W. Leibniz, Studia Leibnitiana, Supplementa XXVI, Steiner, Germany, pp. 110-125.

Carboncini, S. (1988), “Der Briefwechsel zwischen Leibniz und Christian Wolff”, en I. Marchlewitz (ed.), Leibniz. Tradition und Aktualität. Vorträge des V. Int. Leibniz-Kongresses (Hannover, 14-19 November 1988), Steiner, Germany, pp. 139-146.

Carboncini, S. (2021), “Development and Diffusion of Wolff’s Psychology Through His Disciples and Followers”, en S. F. Araujo; T. C. R. Pereira; T. Sturm (eds.), Op. Cit., pp. 197-225.

Cataldi Madonna, L. (2001), Christian Wolff und das System des klassischen Rationalismus: die philosophia experimentalis universalis, Olms, Germany.

Corr, C. A. (1974), “Did Wolff Follow Leibniz?”, en G. Funke (ed.), Akten des 4. Internationalen Kant Kongresses, Mainz, 6.–10. April 1974, Teil II. 1. Sektionen, De Gruyter, Germany, pp. 11-21.

Corr, C. A. (1975), “Christian Wolff and Leibniz”, Journal of the History of Ideas, 36 (2), pp. 241-262.

Corr, C. A. (1983), “Introduction”, en C. Wolff, Gesammelte Werke. I Abteilung, Band 2. Vernünftige Gedanken von Gott, der Welt und der Seele des Menschen, Olms, Germany, pp. 1-47.

Dehrmann, M. K. (2008), Das Orakel der Deisten: Shaftesbury und die deutsche Aufklärung, Wallstein, Germany.

Dyck, C. W. (2014), Kant and Rational Psychology, Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom.

Dyck, C. W. (2018), “Between Wolffianism and Pietism: Baumgarten’s Rational Psychology”, en C. D. Fugate; J. Hymers (eds.), Baumgarten and Kant on Metaphysics, Oxford University Press, United Kingdom, pp. 78-93.

Dyck, C. W.; Wunderlich, F. (eds.) (2018), Kant and his German Contemporaries, Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom.

École, J. (1966), “Des rapports de l’expérience et de la raison dans l’analyse de l’âme ou la ‘Psychologia empirica’ de Christian Wolff”, Giornale di Metafisica, 21 (4–5), pp. 589-617.

École, J. (1968), “Editoris introductio”, en C. Wolff, Op. Cit., pp. V-XXXVII.

École, J. (1969), “De la nature de l’âme, de la déduction de ses facultés, de ses rapports avec le corps, ou la ‘Psychologia rationalis’ de Christian Wolff”, Giornale di Metafisica, 24 (4-6), pp. 499-531.

École, J. (1983), “Des rapports de Wolff avec Leibniz dans le domaine de la métaphysique”, en Leibniz. Werk und Wirkung. IV. Internationaler Leibniz-Kongress, Gottfried-Wilhelm-Leibniz-Gesellschaft, Germany, pp. 153-163.

École, J. (1987), “La critique wolffienne des systèmes d’explication des rapports de l’âme et du corps”, Il cannocchiale. Rivista di studi filosofici, 1–2, pp. 3-21.

École, J. (1990), La Métaphysique de Christian Wolff, Olms, Germany.

École, J. (1998), “War Christian Wolff ein Leibnitianer?”, Aufklärung, 10 (1), pp. 29-46.

Falkenstein, L. (1998), “A Double Edged Sword? Kant’s Refutation of Mendelssohn’s Proof of the Immortality of the Soul and Its Implications for His Theory of Matter”, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 29A (4), pp. 561-588.

Feiner, S. (2010), Moses Mendelssohn. Sage of Modernity, Yale University Press, USA.

Gerlach, H. M. (ed.) (2001), Christian Wolff – seine Schule und seine Gegner, Meiner, Germany.

Gómez Tutor, J. I. (2004), Die wissenschaftliche Methode bei Christian Wolff, Olms, Germany.

Goubet, J. F.; Rudolph, O. P. (eds.) (2004), Die Psychologie Christian Wolffs. Systematische und historische Untersuchungen, Max Niemeyer Verlag, Germany.

Klemme, H. (1996), Kants Philosophie des Subjekts: systematische und entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen zum Verhältnis von Selbstbewusstsein und Selbsterkenntnis, Meiner, Germany.

Kuehn, M. (1987), Scottish Common Sense in Germany, 1768–1800: A Contribution to the History of Critical Philosophy, McGill-Queen’s University Press, Canada.

Leduc, C. (2013), “Les ‘Meditationes’ de Leibniz dans la tradition wolffienne”, Archives de Philosophie, 76 (2), pp. 295-317.

Leduc, C. (2018), “Sources of Wolff’s Philosophy: Scholastics/Leibniz”, en R. Theis; A. Aichele (eds.), Handbuch Christian Wolff, Springer, Germany, pp. 35-53.

Macor, L. A. (2013), Die Bestimmung des Menschen (1748-1800): Eine Begriffsgeschichte, Frommann-Holzboog (Forschungen und Materialien zur deutschen Aufklärung II, 25).

Marcolungo, F. L. (1975), “Principi e sistema. Saggio sui rapporti Wolff – Leibniz”, en C. Giacon (ed.), Storiografia e Filosofia del linguaggio, Antenore, Italy, pp. 85-121.

Marcolungo, F. L. (2007), Christian Wolff tra Psicologia Empirica e Psicologia Rationale, Olms, Germany.

Neveu, S. (2017), L’a priori, l’a posteriori, le pur, le non pur chez Christian Wolff et ses maîtres (Christian Wolff: Gesammelte Werke, III. Abteilung, Bd. 148. Wolffiana, 5), Olms, Germany.

Pollok, A. (2010), Facetten des Menschen. Zu Moses Mendelssohns Anthropologie, Meiner, Germany.

Pollok, A. (2018), “Beautiful Perception and its Object. Mendelssohn’s Theory of Mixed Sentiments Reconsidered”, Kant-Studien, 109 (2), pp. 270-285.

Poser, H. (1975), “Zum Begriff der Monade bei Leibniz und Wolff”, en Akten des II. Internationalen Leibniz-Kongresses Hannover 17.–22. Juli 1972, Bd. 3 (Studia Leibnitiana Supplementa, 14), Steiner, Germany, pp. 383-395.

Richards, R. J. (1980), “Christian Wolff’s Prolegomena to Empirical and Rational Psychology: Translation and Commentary”, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 124 (4), pp. 227-239.

Sales Vilalta, G. (2022), L’estudi de l’ànima humana a l’Alemanya del segle XVIII. Christian Wolff, Moses Mendelssohn i Immanuel Kant [Tesi doctoral, Universitat de Barcelona].

Schneiders, W. (1973), “Leibniz – Thomasius – Wolff. Die Anfänge der Aufklärung in Deutschland”, en Akten des II. Internationalen Leibniz-Kongresses Hannover 17.–22. Juli 1972, Bd. I (Studia Leibnitiana Supplementa, 12), Steiner, Germany, pp. 105-121.

Tonelli, G. (1971), “The ‘Weakness’ of Reason in the Age of Enlightenment”, Diderot Studies, 14, pp. 217-244.

Tonelli, G. (1977), “La filosofía alemana de Leibniz hasta Kant”, en Y. Belaval (ed.), La filosofía alemana de Leibniz a Hegel, Siglo Veintiuno, Spain, pp. 98-165.

Wilson, C. (1995), “The Reception of Leibniz in the Eighteenth Century”, en N. Jolley (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Leibniz, Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom, pp. 442-476.

Wundt, M. (1945), Die deutsche Schulmetaphysik im Zeitalter der Aufklärung, Olms, Germany.

Descarga artículo

Crossmark

Métricas

Publicado

2025-11-05

Cómo citar

Sales Vilalta G. (2025). Before (and beyond) Kant’s Paralogisms: Wolff’s Psychologia Rationalis (1734) and Mendelssohn’s Phaedon (1767). Con-Textos Kantianos. International Journal of Philosophy, 22, 15-24. https://doi.org/10.5209/kant.104249