Kantian Transcendental Pessimism and Jamesian Empirical Meliorism

  • Sami Pihlström University of Helsinki, Finland
Keywords: James, Kant, meliorism, pessimism, religion

Abstract

Kant’s philosophy was an important background for the pragmatist tradition, even though some of the major classical pragmatists, especially William James, were unwilling to acknowledge their debt to Kant. This essay considers the relation between Kant and James from the perspective of their conceptions of the human condition. In particular, I examine their shared pessimism, employing Vanden Auweele’s (2019) recent analysis of Kant’s pessimism and arguing that this is required by James’s meliorism (which is put forward as a middle-ground option between optimism and pessimism). A comparative inquiry into Kant’s and James’s views on the relation between ethics and religion is provided against this background of their shared philosophical anthropology.

Author Biography

Sami Pihlström, University of Helsinki, Finland

Sami Pihlström is (since 2014) Professor of Philosophy of Religion at the University of Helsinki, Finland.

He is currently also the President of the Philosophical Society of Finland, as well as the Chair of the Research Council for Culture and Society at the Academy of Finland. He was previously (2009-2015) the Director of the Helsinki Collegium for Advanced Studies. He has since the 1990s published widely on pragmatism, realism, ethics, metaphysics, and philosophy of religion. His recent books include Death and Finitude: Toward a Pragmatic Transcendental Anthropology of Human Limits and Mortality 2016), Kantian Antitheodicy: Philosophical and Literary Varieties (Palgrave 2016) and Pragmatic Realism, Religious Truth, and Antitheodicy: On Viewing the World by Acknowledging. 

the Other

View citations

Article download

Crossmark

Metrics

Published
2020-06-03
How to Cite
Pihlström S. (2020). Kantian Transcendental Pessimism and Jamesian Empirical Meliorism. Con-Textos Kantianos. International Journal of Philosophy, 11, 313-335. https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/KANT/article/view/89758
Section
Discussions