Revisiting Kant’s Legacy in Continental Philosophy

References

Baiasu, R. (2020), “Heidegger’s Interpretation of Kant’s Transcendental Schematism”, in S. Baiasu and A. Vanzo (eds.), Kant and the Continental Tradition: Sensibility, Nature and Religion. Milton, Routledge, pp. 61-78.

Baiasu, S. and Vanzo, A. (2020), “Kant and the Continental Tradition”, in S. Baiasu and A. Vanzo (eds.), Kant and the Continental Tradition: Sensibility, Nature and Religion. Milton, Routledge, pp. 3-20.

Crome, K. (2020), “Disputing Critique: Lyotard’s Kantian Differend”, in S. Baiasu and A. Vanzo (eds.), Kant and the Continental Tradition: Sensibility, Nature and Religion. Milton, Routledge, pp. 131-145.

Cutrofello, A. (1994), Discipline and Critqiue: Kant, Poststructuralism, and the Problem of Resistance. Albany: New York, State University of New York Press.

Hengehold, L. (2007), The Body Problematic: Political Imagination in Kant and Foucault. Pennsylvania Park, Pennsylvania State University Press.

Jones, R. (2020), “Kant, Hegel and Irigaray: From ‘Chemism’ to the Elemental”, in S. Baiasu and A. Vanzo (eds.), Kant and the Continental Tradition: Sensibility, Nature and Religion. Milton, Routledge, pp. 146-170.

Moran, D. (2020), “Kant on Intuition”, in S. Baiasu and A. Vanzo (eds.), Kant and the Continental Tradition: Sensibility, Nature and Religion. Milton, Routledge, pp. 23-60.

Schrift, A. D. (ed.), (2020), Kant, Kantianism, and Idealism: The Origins of Continental Philosophy (8 vols.). Chicago, University of Chicago Press.

Schulting, D. (2020), “The ‘Proper’ Tone of Critical Philosophy: Kant and Derrida on Metaphilosophy and the Use of Religious Tropes”, in S. Baiasu and A. Vanzo (eds.), Kant and the Continental Tradition: Sensibility, Nature and Religion. Milton, Routledge, pp. 194-221.