Kant's Appearance as an Objectual Representation
- Sergey Katrechko Universidad de Alicante
Abstract
Autor/innen-Biografie
Literaturhinweise
Abela, P. (2002), Kant's Empirical Realism, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Allais, L. (2015), Manifest Reality: Kant's Idealism and his Realism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Allison, H. (1983), Transcendental Idealism: A Defense, New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Allison, H. (2004), Kant's Transcendental Idealism: An Interpretation and Defense, New Haven and London: Yale University Press, Revised and Enlarged Edition.
Americks, K. (2012), "Kant's Idealism on a Moderate Interpretation", in: Karl Ameriks Kant's Elliptical Path, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Baldner, K. (1990), "Is Transcendental Idealism Coherent?", Synthese, V.85 N.1, pp.1–23.
Barker, S.F. (1967), "Appearing and appearances in Kant", The Monist Vol. 51, No. 3, Kant Today: Part I, pp. 426–441.
Bird, G. (1962), Kant's Theory of Knowledge: An Outline of One Central Argument in the Critique of Pure Reason, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Bird, G. (2006), The Revolutionary Kant: A Commentary on the Critique of Pure Reason, Chicago and La Salle: Open Court.
Bolzano, B. (1972), Theory of Science. Ed. and trans. R. George. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California Press.
Cassirer E. (1936), Determinismus und Indeterminismus in der modernen Physik: historische und systematische Studien Zum Kausalproblem, Goteborgs Hogskolas Arsskrift XLII, Elanders Boktryckeri Aktiebolag.
Cassirer, E. (1923), Substance and Function. Chicago: Open Court, 1923 (Substanzbegriff und Funktionsbegriff: Untersuchungen über die Grundfragen der Erkenntniskritik. Berlin, 1910).
Chisholm, R. J. (1957), Perceiving. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Chisholm, R.J. (1950), "The Theory of Appearing", Max Black (ed.) Philosophical Analysis, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press), pp. 102–118.
Collins, A. (1999), Possible Experience: Understanding Kant's Critique of Pure Reason, University of California Press.
Falkenstein, L. (1991), "Kant's Account of Intuition", Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Vol.21, No. 2, pp. 165–193.
Falkenstein, L. (1995), Kant's Intuitionism: A Commentary on the Transcendental Aesthetic, University of Toronto Press.
Herring, H. (1953), "Das Problem der Affektion bei Kant", Kant-Studien, Erganzungsheft no. 67.
Horstmann, R.-P. (1997), Bausteine kritischer Philosophie. Arbeiten zu Kant. Bodenheim.
Howell, R. (2011), Kant on Representation and Objectivity (A.B. Dickerson, 2004): https://ndpr.nd.edu/news/kant-on-representation-and-objectivity/ (accessed 11, 17, 2017).
Jacobi, F.H. (1787), "Ueber den transzendentalen Idealismus" (Appendix to David Hume über den Glauben, oder Idealismus und Realismus. Ein Gespräch), Werke, Vol. 2 (ed. Friedrich Roth and Friedrich Köppen), Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1976, pp.291–310.
Kant, Immanuel: The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Immanuel Kant (eds. P. Guyer and A. Wood), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992 –:
Katrechko, S.L. (2014b) Transcendentalism as a Special Type of Philosophizing: Kant's transcendental Shift, Dasein-Analysis of Heidegger and Sachverhalt–Ontology of Wittgenstein, Papers of the 37th International Wittgenstein Symposium, Bd.XXII, Kirchberg am Wessel, 2014, pp.147–149.
Katrechko, S.L. (2014а), Kant's transcendentalism as transcendental paradigm of philosophizing [Transcendentalizm Kanta kak transcendental'naja paradigma filosofstvovanija], Kantovsky sbornik, 48 (2), pp.10–25.
Katrechko, S.L. (2016) Transcendentalizm Kanta kak realisticheskaja teorija opyta/poznanija (analiz struktury kantovskogo kopernikanskogo perevorota) [Does the Kant's Copernican Revolution Lead to Idealism? (Structure and Dialectic of Kant's Copernican Revolution], Shiyan T. (ed.) Filosofija i nauka: problemy sootnesenija, Moscow: RGGU, Kn.1, s.213–226 (see: https://www.academia.edu/30347748/ (in Russian); see also: Katrechko S.L. Does the Kant's Copernican Revolution Lead to Idealism? (Analysis of the Structure of Kant's Copernican Turn) //Voprosy Filosophii, 2017 [forthcoming; in Russian]).
Katrechko, S.L. (2017) Kantovskiiy transcendentalizm Kanta i ego koncept veshi samoiy po sebe [Kant's transcendentalism and his concept 'thing-in-itself'], Kantovsky sbornik, 36(4), pp.7–21 (https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29037582).
Katrechko, S.L. (2018) "Transcendentalism as the Special Type of Philosophizing and Transcendental Paradigm of Philosophy", in: Violetta Waibel, Margit Ruffing (eds.) Nature and Freedom. Proceedings of the 12th International Kant Congress. Berlin: Walter DeGruyter, [forthcoming].
Palmquist, S.R. (1986), "Six Perspectives on the Object in Kant's Theory of Knowledge", Dialectica, Vol.40, No.2, pp.121–151.
Prauss, G. (1971), Erscheinung bei Kant: Ein Problem der "Kritik der reinen Vernunft", Berlin: de Gruyter & Co.
Prauss, G. (1974), Kant und das Problem der Dinge an sich, Bonn: Bouvier.
Prichard, H.A. (1909), Kant's theory of knowledge, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Robinson, H. (1994), "Two Perspectives on Kant's Appearances and Things in Themselves" Journal of the History of Philosophy, no. 32, pp. 411–441.
Rohlf, M. (2010), Immanuel Kant (SEP); https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant/#TraIde (accessed 20, 05, 2018).
Sellars, W. (1968), Science and Metaphysics: Variations on Kantian Themes, Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd; London, and The Humanities Press; New York.
Westphal, K.R. (2004), Kant's Transcendental Proof of Realism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Kant, I. 1998, in: Guyer, P., and Wood, A., (eds.) Critique of Pure Reason, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Kant, I. 1999, in: Zweig, A., (ed.) Correspondence, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Kant, I. 2002, Prolegomena to any Future Metaphysics: That Will Be Able to Come Forward as Science, in: Allison, H., and Heath, P. (eds.) Theoretical Philosophy after 1781, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Kant, I. 2007, Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View, in: Immanuel Kant, Anthropology, History, and Education, Günter Zöller and Robert Louden (eds.), Cambridge University Press.